Pedigree Analysis

    Generations

    Coefficients of Kinship, Relationship and Inbreeding 5 Generations - Lukas v. Auwelt
    This page shows the inbreeding calculations for the dog you selected or the "Test Mating" you have entered. The calculations on this page are accurate to the point that they can only be made based upon the information in the database. For more detailed calculations please make sure that as many ancestors as possible are entered to the database.

    COI Calculation - Lukas v. Auwelt
    COI 5 gen: 1.172%    very very low    Calculate COI again

    Please do the new calculation only if you have entered new ancestors of this dog!


    COI Calculation - Sire Aron v. Averbeck and Dam Imme v. Auwelt
    Sire: COI 5 gen: 0.000%    too low to be reliabe    Calculate COI again

    Dam: COI 5 gen: 0.781%    too low to be reliabe    Calculate COI again

    Ancestor-Loss coefficient (ALC)
    This method doesn't replace the calculation of the COI but also gives important information for the breeder. Ancestor-Loss is given when the same ancestor appears more than once in the pedigree of the dog. A 5-generations-pedigree shows 62 possible ancestors. If one of this 62 possible ancestors appears twice, the dog in question has indeed only 61 different ancestors. If 3 ancestors appear twice, this dog has indeed only 59 different ancestors. The ALC is calculated out of the nr. of the ancestors and the total nr. of possible ancestors.

    # of dogs
    Ancestors in 5 Generations (max. 62)57
    Ancestor Loss5
    Ancestor Loss in %91.94 %

    Contributing Ancestors
    AncestorBlood %# of appearances12345
    Imme v. Auwelt50.00011
    Aron v. Averbeck50.00011
    Cliff v. Fränkischen Bauern25.00011
    Esta v. Auwelt25.00011
    Arras v. Eikenloh25.00011
    Gitta v. d. Wallburg25.00011
    Lucie Nelha12.50011
    Zick v. Sämmenhof12.50022
    Jakob v. Sämmenhof12.50011
    Asta Westerode12.50011
    Lukas v. Linduri12.50011
    Brutus v. Stockey12.50011
    Gordon v. d. Hafkesdell12.50011
    Anka v. Schönrain12.50011
    Alice v. Wiebusch12.50011
    Dixie v. Falkenhorst6.25011
    Cora v. d. Pfauheck6.25011
    Bobby v. d. Hasenheide6.25011
    Olly v. Bärenhorst6.25011
    Joe v. Fasanenhof6.25011
    Lara v. Werlacke6.25011
    Chica v. d. Hafkesdell6.25011
    Filou v. Alten Hafen6.25011
    Cora v. d. Hafkesdell6.25011
    Bodo v. d. Kummel6.25011
    Solojäger's Granne6.25011
    Hektor v. Geierling6.25011
    Hesta v. Linduri6.25011
    Afra v. d. Bohlsener Mühle6.25011
    Dina Chamavia6.24022
    Cent v. Hofried6.24022
    Alf v. Siegbogen6.24022
    Vroni v. Sämmenhof6.24022
    Olga v. Bärenhorst3.12011
    Solojäger's Distel3.12011
    Gambo v. Werlacke3.12011
    Becas v. Lönsstein3.12011
    Dirk v. Geierling3.12011
    Baldur v. Lönsstein3.12011
    Ester v. Geierling3.12011
    Asta v. Mönchsbrunnen3.12011
    Paris v. d. Waterkant3.12011
    Cliff v. Linduri3.12011
    Carmen v. d. Nordmannstannen3.12011
    Asta v. Bartelskamp3.12011
    Graf v. Silbersee3.12011
    Ilse v. Fasanenhof3.12011
    Hektor v. d. Lindenhöhe3.12011
    Drossel v. d. Grassel3.12011
    Onko v. Tecklenburg3.12011
    Asja v. Alten Hafen3.12011
    Etzel v. Nörderkamp3.12011
    Arko v. Kammerforst3.12011
    Cindy v. Tenntal3.12011
    Bonny v. Jägerkreuz3.12011
    Dandy v. Roonstein3.12011
    Asta v. Werlacke3.12011

    Last updated Wednesday 23 November 2022 20:32 CET



    I have 🍪s