Pedigree Analysis

    Generations

    Coefficients of Kinship, Relationship and Inbreeding 5 Generations - Hertha v. Rodekopp
    This page shows the inbreeding calculations for the dog you selected or the "Test Mating" you have entered. The calculations on this page are accurate to the point that they can only be made based upon the information in the database. For more detailed calculations please make sure that as many ancestors as possible are entered to the database.

    COI Calculation - Hertha v. Rodekopp
    COI 5 gen: 0.391%    too low to be reliabe    Calculate COI again

    Please do the new calculation only if you have entered new ancestors of this dog!


    COI Calculation - Sire Egon v. Buchheim and Dam Elsbeth v. Rodekopp
    Sire: COI 5 gen: 0.977%    too low to be reliabe    Calculate COI again

    Dam: COI 5 gen: 0.391%    too low to be reliabe    Calculate COI again

    Ancestor-Loss coefficient (ALC)
    This method doesn't replace the calculation of the COI but also gives important information for the breeder. Ancestor-Loss is given when the same ancestor appears more than once in the pedigree of the dog. A 5-generations-pedigree shows 62 possible ancestors. If one of this 62 possible ancestors appears twice, the dog in question has indeed only 61 different ancestors. If 3 ancestors appear twice, this dog has indeed only 59 different ancestors. The ALC is calculated out of the nr. of the ancestors and the total nr. of possible ancestors.

    # of dogs
    Ancestors in 5 Generations (max. 62)59
    Ancestor Loss3
    Ancestor Loss in %95.16 %

    Contributing Ancestors
    AncestorBlood %# of appearances12345
    Egon v. Buchheim50.00011
    Elsbeth v. Rodekopp50.00011
    Rivkah v. Buchheim25.00011
    Westfalen's Chef25.00011
    Aika v. Rodekopp25.00011
    Elch v. Hanauer Land25.00011
    Kira v. Tillplatz12.50011
    Osca Aus Grupilinga12.50011
    Lilli v. Buchheim12.50011
    Tanja De Wynen12.50011
    Aika v. Buchwald12.50011
    Aury v. Waidbosch12.50011
    Bodo v. d. Hasenheide12.50011
    Asmus v. d. Segeberger Heide12.50011
    Graf v. Silbersee9.370211
    Ikarus v. Buchheim6.25011
    Dax v. Forst Ostenwalde6.25011
    Cora v. Holmesborn6.25011
    Arco v. Backemeer6.25011
    Vulkan De Wynen6.25011
    Jolly De Wynen6.25011
    Distel v. Buchheim6.25011
    Olga v. d. Drachheide6.25011
    Ondra v. Lossetal6.25011
    Benno v. Pfarrerwald6.25011
    Cliff v. Linduri6.25011
    Solojäger's Laura6.25011
    Esko v. Mühlenberg6.25011
    Olga v. Bärenhorst6.25011
    Dana v. Tillplatz6.25011
    Jakob v. Sämmenhof6.24022
    Hajo Aus Grupilinga6.24022
    Puro v. d. Faistenau3.12011
    Paris v. d. Waterkant3.12011
    Hasso v. d. Holzheide3.12011
    Hakon v. Forstgarten3.12011
    Solojäger's Harras3.12011
    Farah v. Minatal3.12011
    Utz v. Lönsstein3.12011
    Bosco v. Rotenberg3.12011
    Anke v. Keenmoor3.12011
    Fanni v. Osterfeld3.12011
    Bella v. Tillplatz3.12011
    Catja v. Niddatal3.12011
    Maestro De Wynen3.12011
    Andra v. Buchheim3.12011
    Cim v. Wuddelhoff3.12011
    Yalk De Wynen3.12011
    Itta De Wynen3.12011
    Antje v. Buchheim3.12011
    Eike v. Lossetal3.12011
    Nadja De Wynen3.12011
    Elsa v. Burghöft3.12011
    Boss v. Silbersee3.12011
    Dolly v. Lossetal3.12011
    Drossel v. d. Grassel3.12011
    Hera v. Wasserplatz3.12011
    Asta v. Bartelskamp3.12011
    Etzel v. Nörderkamp3.12011

    Last updated Wednesday 23 November 2022 20:32 CET



    I have 🍪s