Pedigree Analysis

    Generations

    Coefficients of Kinship, Relationship and Inbreeding 5 Generations - Gina L v. Rodekopp
    This page shows the inbreeding calculations for the dog you selected or the "Test Mating" you have entered. The calculations on this page are accurate to the point that they can only be made based upon the information in the database. For more detailed calculations please make sure that as many ancestors as possible are entered to the database.

    COI Calculation - Gina L v. Rodekopp
    COI 5 gen: 0.391%    too low to be reliabe    Calculate COI again

    Please do the new calculation only if you have entered new ancestors of this dog!


    COI Calculation - Sire Basco v. Matzental and Dam Elsbeth v. Rodekopp
    Sire: COI 5 gen: 0.391%    too low to be reliabe    Calculate COI again

    Dam: COI 5 gen: 0.391%    too low to be reliabe    Calculate COI again

    Ancestor-Loss coefficient (ALC)
    This method doesn't replace the calculation of the COI but also gives important information for the breeder. Ancestor-Loss is given when the same ancestor appears more than once in the pedigree of the dog. A 5-generations-pedigree shows 62 possible ancestors. If one of this 62 possible ancestors appears twice, the dog in question has indeed only 61 different ancestors. If 3 ancestors appear twice, this dog has indeed only 59 different ancestors. The ALC is calculated out of the nr. of the ancestors and the total nr. of possible ancestors.

    # of dogs
    Ancestors in 5 Generations (max. 62)61
    Ancestor Loss1
    Ancestor Loss in %98.39 %

    Contributing Ancestors
    AncestorBlood %# of appearances12345
    Basco v. Matzental50.00011
    Elsbeth v. Rodekopp50.00011
    Asta v. Pamesgrub25.00011
    Elch v. Hanauer Land25.00011
    Orka v. d. Drachheide25.00011
    Aika v. Rodekopp25.00011
    Hajo Aus Grupilinga12.50011
    Cord v. Wasserplatz12.50011
    Aury v. Waidbosch12.50011
    Aika v. Buchwald12.50011
    Bodo v. d. Hasenheide12.50011
    Tanja De Wynen12.50011
    Bessy v. Ahnherrn12.50011
    Elsa v. Burghöft12.50011
    Cliff v. Linduri9.370211
    Kent v. Poppenforst6.25011
    Olga v. Bärenhorst6.25011
    Iva v. d. Drachheide6.25011
    Ondra v. Lossetal6.25011
    Nimrod's Birko6.25011
    Gina v. Poppenforst6.25011
    Jolly De Wynen6.25011
    Bella v. Peigarten6.25011
    Graf v. Silbersee6.25011
    Cora v. Holmesborn6.25011
    Arko v. Kammerforst6.25011
    Tinka v. d. Bilsbek6.25011
    Vulkan De Wynen6.25011
    Esko v. Mühlenberg6.25011
    Basko v. Bucheneck6.25011
    Catja v. Niddatal3.12011
    Nora v. Hahnenkamm3.12011
    Lyra v. d. Königseiche3.12011
    Boss v. Silbersee3.12011
    Cilla v. Jägerkreuz3.12011
    Larry v. Ringofen3.12011
    Paris v. d. Waterkant3.12011
    Etzel v. Nörderkamp3.12011
    Asta v. Bartelskamp3.12011
    Benno v. d. Haalquelle3.12011
    Bosco v. Rotenberg3.12011
    Harro v. Lossetal3.12011
    Aspe v. Bondenholz3.12011
    Alf v. Wachtelrangen3.12011
    Hasso v. d. Holzheide3.12011
    Asra v. Eulenhof3.12011
    Itta De Wynen3.12011
    Maestro De Wynen3.12011
    Chico v. Borgkamp3.12011
    Arco v. Poppenforst3.12011
    Fee v. d. Kiefhornsmühle3.12011
    Yalk De Wynen3.12011
    Esta v. Leefeld3.12011
    Utz v. Lönsstein3.12011
    Eike v. Lossetal3.12011
    Nadja De Wynen3.12011
    Benno v. Pfarrerwald3.12011
    Fanni v. Osterfeld3.12011
    Dolly v. Lossetal3.12011
    Drossel v. d. Grassel3.12011
    Natja v. d. Holzheide3.12011

    Last updated Wednesday 23 November 2022 20:32 CET



    I have 🍪s