Pedigree Analysis

    Generations

    Coefficients of Kinship, Relationship and Inbreeding 5 Generations - Bessy v. Ahnherrn
    This page shows the inbreeding calculations for the dog you selected or the "Test Mating" you have entered. The calculations on this page are accurate to the point that they can only be made based upon the information in the database. For more detailed calculations please make sure that as many ancestors as possible are entered to the database.

    COI Calculation - Bessy v. Ahnherrn
    COI 5 gen: 0.195%    too low to be reliabe    Calculate COI again

    Please do the new calculation only if you have entered new ancestors of this dog!


    COI Calculation - Sire Kent v. Poppenforst and Dam Gina v. Poppenforst
    Sire: COI 5 gen: 0.391%    too low to be reliabe    Calculate COI again

    Dam: COI 5 gen: 0.000%    too low to be reliabe    Calculate COI again

    Ancestor-Loss coefficient (ALC)
    This method doesn't replace the calculation of the COI but also gives important information for the breeder. Ancestor-Loss is given when the same ancestor appears more than once in the pedigree of the dog. A 5-generations-pedigree shows 62 possible ancestors. If one of this 62 possible ancestors appears twice, the dog in question has indeed only 61 different ancestors. If 3 ancestors appear twice, this dog has indeed only 59 different ancestors. The ALC is calculated out of the nr. of the ancestors and the total nr. of possible ancestors.

    # of dogs
    Ancestors in 5 Generations (max. 62)61
    Ancestor Loss1
    Ancestor Loss in %98.39 %

    Contributing Ancestors
    AncestorBlood %# of appearances12345
    Gina v. Poppenforst50.00011
    Kent v. Poppenforst50.00011
    Benno v. d. Haalquelle25.00011
    Benno v. Pfarrerwald25.00011
    Natja v. d. Holzheide25.00011
    Cilla v. Jägerkreuz25.00011
    Hilda v. d. Hasewiesen12.50011
    Cindy v. Bärenhorst12.50011
    Farah v. Minatal12.50011
    Arko v. Abtswald12.50011
    Cäsar v. Bruckhof12.50011
    Niklas De Wynen12.50011
    Puro v. d. Faistenau12.50011
    Anja v. Salinenblick12.50011
    Uhl v. Lönsstein6.25011
    Axel v. Fichtenhain6.25011
    Unda v. Lönsstein6.25011
    Bussa v. Saaletal6.25011
    Alf v.d. Goldenen Aue6.25011
    Esso v. Oberleis6.25011
    Carry v. d. Hasewiesen6.25011
    Irrwisch De Wynen6.25011
    Exy v. Minatal6.25011
    Moritz v. Sämmenhof6.25011
    Jenny De Wynen6.25011
    Arrak v. Hagenpolder6.25011
    Hussa v. Rheinufer6.25011
    Groll v. Reutherspfad6.25011
    Otti v. Faistenau6.25011
    Cita v. d. Donauauen6.25011
    Alan Z Serikoveho Kraje6.24022
    Hella v. Sämmenhof3.12011
    Hazel De Wynen3.12011
    Gin v. Reuth3.12011
    Arco v. Reutherspfad3.12011
    Cora v. Tannenkamp3.12011
    Gambo v. Werlacke3.12011
    Xandra v. Lönsstein3.12011
    Cuno v. d. Frankenburg3.12011
    Cord v. d. Sechsämter Stadt3.12011
    Utz v. Lönsstein3.12011
    Anka v. d. Vereinigung3.12011
    Basko v. Hesselborn3.12011
    Artus v. d. Hasewiesen3.12011
    Boro v. Silbersee3.12011
    Nadja v. Lönsstein3.12011
    Asta v. Amesleiten3.12011
    Bodo v.d. Wilhelmsburg3.12011
    Astra v. Klosterberg3.12011
    Natter v. Lönsstein3.12011
    Rita v.Kettenlüss3.12011
    Bodo v. Weserstrand3.12011
    Fango v. Waterkant3.12011
    Piter v. Feuersang3.12011
    Gabi v. d. Frankenburg3.12011
    Ingo v. Schadwalde3.12011
    Dixie v. Neuenhof3.12011
    Asta v. Werlacke3.12011
    Betty v.d. Steubach3.12011
    Fani v. Breitenstein3.12011
    Heidi v. Lönsstein3.12011

    Last updated Wednesday 23 November 2022 20:32 CET



    I have 🍪s