Pedigree Analysis

    Generations

    Coefficients of Kinship, Relationship and Inbreeding 5 Generations - Basca v. Mühbrooker Meer
    This page shows the inbreeding calculations for the dog you selected or the "Test Mating" you have entered. The calculations on this page are accurate to the point that they can only be made based upon the information in the database. For more detailed calculations please make sure that as many ancestors as possible are entered to the database.

    COI Calculation - Basca v. Mühbrooker Meer
    COI 5 gen: 0.000%    too low to be reliabe    Calculate COI again

    Please do the new calculation only if you have entered new ancestors of this dog!


    COI Calculation - Sire Greif v. Reitbach and Dam Erle v. d. Segeberger Heide
    Sire: COI 5 gen: 0.000%    too low to be reliabe    Calculate COI again

    Dam: COI 5 gen: 0.195%    too low to be reliabe    Calculate COI again

    Ancestor-Loss coefficient (ALC)
    This method doesn't replace the calculation of the COI but also gives important information for the breeder. Ancestor-Loss is given when the same ancestor appears more than once in the pedigree of the dog. A 5-generations-pedigree shows 62 possible ancestors. If one of this 62 possible ancestors appears twice, the dog in question has indeed only 61 different ancestors. If 3 ancestors appear twice, this dog has indeed only 59 different ancestors. The ALC is calculated out of the nr. of the ancestors and the total nr. of possible ancestors.

    # of dogs
    Ancestors in 5 Generations (max. 62)60
    Ancestor Loss2
    Ancestor Loss in %96.77 %

    Contributing Ancestors
    AncestorBlood %# of appearances12345
    Erle v. d. Segeberger Heide50.00011
    Greif v. Reitbach50.00011
    Rika v. Linduri25.00011
    Distel v.d. Segeberger Heide25.00011
    Conrad v. Birkengehege25.00011
    Arras v. Eschbach25.00011
    Bautz v. d. Leda12.50011
    Pom v. Minatal12.50011
    Horrik v. Wasserplatz12.50011
    Gina v. Roonstein12.50011
    Amsel v. Silbergrund12.50011
    Arras v. Eikenloh12.50011
    Laika v. Linduri12.50011
    Olga v. d. Drachheide12.50011
    Hesta v. Linduri9.370211
    Olly v. Bärenhorst9.370211
    Gitta v. Lossetal6.25011
    Cäsar v. Elsternkamp6.25011
    Lucie Nelha6.25011
    Elsa v. Burghöft6.25011
    Nora v. Minatal6.25011
    Cora v. Schäferbusch6.25011
    Derry v. Erlesberg6.25011
    Hajo Aus Grupilinga6.25011
    Elch v. Hanauer Land6.25011
    Laura v. Poppenforst6.25011
    Freya v. Roonstein6.25011
    Lukas v. Linduri6.25011
    Graf v. Silbersee6.25011
    Benno v. Pfarrerwald6.25011
    Aika v. Buchwald3.12011
    Jerome De Wynen3.12011
    Boss v. Silbersee3.12011
    Katja v. Minatal3.12011
    Flocke v. d. Tränke3.12011
    Etzel v. Nörderkamp3.12011
    Solojäger's Granne3.12011
    Asta v. Bartelskamp3.12011
    Hella v. d. Lindenhöhe3.12011
    Faro v. d. Falkenweiden3.12011
    Dandy v. Roonstein3.12011
    Dolly v. Lossetal3.12011
    Bodo v. d. Hasenheide3.12011
    Jenny v. Huckberg3.12011
    Locke Frankundfrei3.12011
    Natja v. d. Holzheide3.12011
    Gustel v. d. Kiefhornsmühle3.12011
    Basko v. Bucheneck3.12011
    Iva v. d. Drachheide3.12011
    Tinka v. d. Bilsbek3.12011
    Puro v. d. Faistenau3.12011
    Paris v. d. Waterkant3.12011
    Fratz v. d. Drachheide3.12011
    Biene v. Siegbogen3.12011
    Farah v. Minatal3.12011
    Drossel v. d. Grassel3.12011
    Alo v. Burgstall3.12011
    Nimrod's Birko3.12011
    Joe v. Fasanenhof3.12011
    Uhl v. Lönsstein3.12011

    Last updated Wednesday 23 November 2022 20:32 CET



    I have 🍪s