Pedigree Analysis

    Generations

    Coefficients of Kinship, Relationship and Inbreeding 5 Generations - Queen v. Sämmenhof
    This page shows the inbreeding calculations for the dog you selected or the "Test Mating" you have entered. The calculations on this page are accurate to the point that they can only be made based upon the information in the database. For more detailed calculations please make sure that as many ancestors as possible are entered to the database.

    COI Calculation - Queen v. Sämmenhof
    COI 5 gen: 0.000%    too low to be reliabe    Calculate COI again

    Please do the new calculation only if you have entered new ancestors of this dog!


    COI Calculation - Sire Solojäger's Harras and Dam Jasmin v. Buchheim
    Sire: COI 5 gen: 0.000%    too low to be reliabe    Calculate COI again

    Dam: COI 5 gen: 1.758%    very very low    Calculate COI again

    Ancestor-Loss coefficient (ALC)
    This method doesn't replace the calculation of the COI but also gives important information for the breeder. Ancestor-Loss is given when the same ancestor appears more than once in the pedigree of the dog. A 5-generations-pedigree shows 62 possible ancestors. If one of this 62 possible ancestors appears twice, the dog in question has indeed only 61 different ancestors. If 3 ancestors appear twice, this dog has indeed only 59 different ancestors. The ALC is calculated out of the nr. of the ancestors and the total nr. of possible ancestors.

    # of dogs
    Ancestors in 5 Generations (max. 62)60
    Ancestor Loss2
    Ancestor Loss in %96.77 %

    Contributing Ancestors
    AncestorBlood %# of appearances12345
    Jasmin v. Buchheim50.00011
    Solojäger's Harras50.00011
    Distel v. Buchheim25.00011
    Solojäger's Distel25.00011
    Cato Saerbeck25.00011
    Nimrod's Birko25.00011
    Cliff v. Linduri12.50011
    Quell v. d. Binnenelbe12.50011
    Hella v. Bärenhorst12.50011
    Bautz v. Mönchsbrunnen12.50011
    Antje v. Buchheim12.50011
    Edda v. Jurawald12.50011
    Lyra v. d. Königseiche12.50011
    Jakob v. Sämmenhof12.50011
    Anka v. d. Zirkelquelle6.25011
    Etzel v. Nörderkamp6.25011
    Harro v. Lossetal6.25011
    Carla v. Sämmenhof6.25011
    Freya v. Bärenhorst6.25011
    Anja v. Taubertal6.25011
    Zick v. Sämmenhof6.25011
    Hanko v. Sämmenhof6.25011
    Moritz v. Sämmenhof6.25011
    Lara v. Werlacke6.25011
    Nina v. d. Binnenelbe6.25011
    Gundi v. d. Königseiche6.25011
    Lasko v. Holmesborn6.25011
    Bob v. Moorkamp6.25011
    Drossel v. d. Grassel6.25011
    Kasper Vun'N. Wischhoff6.25011
    Groll Holsatia6.24022
    Vroni v. Sämmenhof6.24022
    Eike v. Sämmenhof3.12011
    Unda v. Lönsstein3.12011
    Eiko Vun'N Wischhoff3.12011
    Asta v. Werlacke3.12011
    Cilli v. Preussenwald3.12011
    Astor v. Fichtenhain3.12011
    Cäsar v. d. Hohen Geest3.12011
    Cent v. Hofried3.12011
    Gambo v. Werlacke3.12011
    Assi v. Lönsstein3.12011
    Osi v. Volkach3.12011
    Artus v. d. Hasewiesen3.12011
    Ria v. d. Böckelsburg3.12011
    Anka v. Duewelsknapp3.12011
    Alan Z Serikoveho Kraje3.12011
    Basko v. Hesselborn3.12011
    Bianka v. d. Königseiche3.12011
    Britta v. Lossetal3.12011
    Britta v. Hasselbach3.12011
    Hella v. d. Moorbrücke3.12011
    Fango v. Waterkant3.12011
    Astor v. d. Weide3.12011
    Benno v. d. Haalquelle3.12011
    Bodo v. Weserstrand3.12011
    Okko Fortuna3.12011
    Hella v. Sämmenhof3.12011
    Polo v. Feuersang3.12011
    Eika Vun'N Wischhoff3.12011

    Last updated Wednesday 23 November 2022 20:32 CET



    I have 🍪s