Pedigree Analysis

    Generations

    Coefficients of Kinship, Relationship and Inbreeding 5 Generations - Cita v. Hollbäck
    This page shows the inbreeding calculations for the dog you selected or the "Test Mating" you have entered. The calculations on this page are accurate to the point that they can only be made based upon the information in the database. For more detailed calculations please make sure that as many ancestors as possible are entered to the database.

    COI Calculation - Cita v. Hollbäck
    COI 5 gen: 0.000%    too low to be reliabe    Calculate COI again

    Please do the new calculation only if you have entered new ancestors of this dog!


    COI Calculation - Sire Coach v. Ziegelweiher and Dam Aska v. Forstkamp
    Sire: COI 5 gen: 1.172%    very very low    Calculate COI again

    Dam: COI 5 gen: 2.734%    very low    Calculate COI again

    Ancestor-Loss coefficient (ALC)
    This method doesn't replace the calculation of the COI but also gives important information for the breeder. Ancestor-Loss is given when the same ancestor appears more than once in the pedigree of the dog. A 5-generations-pedigree shows 62 possible ancestors. If one of this 62 possible ancestors appears twice, the dog in question has indeed only 61 different ancestors. If 3 ancestors appear twice, this dog has indeed only 59 different ancestors. The ALC is calculated out of the nr. of the ancestors and the total nr. of possible ancestors.

    # of dogs
    Ancestors in 5 Generations (max. 62)59
    Ancestor Loss3
    Ancestor Loss in %95.16 %

    Contributing Ancestors
    AncestorBlood %# of appearances12345
    Coach v. Ziegelweiher50.00011
    Aska v. Forstkamp50.00011
    Aron v. Averbeck25.00011
    Meika v. Wasserplatz25.00011
    Westfalen's Birka25.00011
    Artos v. d. Schirmkiefer25.00011
    Birka v. d. Hirtenburg12.50011
    Dixie v. Wasserplatz12.50011
    Kira v. Tillplatz12.50011
    Hajo Aus Grupilinga12.50011
    Cliff v. Fränkischen Bauern12.50011
    Gauner v. Stockey12.50011
    Uri v. Bärenhorst12.50011
    Gitta v. d. Wallburg12.50011
    Gordon v. d. Hafkesdell6.25011
    Arco v. Backemeer6.25011
    Graf Nelha6.25011
    Alice v. Wiebusch6.25011
    Basko v. Bucheneck6.25011
    Evita v. Stockey6.25011
    Asta v. Bartelskamp6.25011
    Elko v. Huntetal6.25011
    Anka v. Schönrain6.25011
    Lukas v. Linduri6.25011
    Laura v. Poppenforst6.25011
    Tina v. d. Bilsbek6.25011
    Alex v. Bannwald6.25011
    Jakob v. Sämmenhof6.25011
    Tinka v. d. Bilsbek6.25011
    Dana v. Tillplatz6.25011
    Asra v. Eulenhof6.24022
    Etzel v. Nörderkamp6.24022
    Chico v. Borgkamp6.24022
    Fee v. d. Kiefhornsmühle3.12011
    Dixie v. Falkenhorst3.12011
    Bodo v. d. Kummel3.12011
    Cora v. d. Hafkesdell3.12011
    Olly v. Bärenhorst3.12011
    Zick v. Sämmenhof3.12011
    Hakon v. Forstgarten3.12011
    Solojäger's Granne3.12011
    Filou v. Alten Hafen3.12011
    Bella v. Tillplatz3.12011
    Lara v. Werlacke3.12011
    Anke v. Keenmoor3.12011
    Hesta v. Linduri3.12011
    Laika v. d. Waterkant3.12011
    Alf v. Wachtelrangen3.12011
    Jerome De Wynen3.12011
    Bobby v. d. Hasenheide3.12011
    Asco Westerode3.12011
    Gero v. Wiken3.12011
    Solojäger's Harras3.12011
    Graf v. Silbersee3.12011
    Cora v. d. Pfauheck3.12011
    Natja v. d. Holzheide3.12011
    Britta v. Bärenhorst3.12011
    Chica v. d. Hafkesdell3.12011
    Branca v. d. Biberquelle3.12011

    Last updated Wednesday 23 November 2022 20:32 CET



    I have 🍪s