Pedigree Analysis

    Generations

    Coefficients of Kinship, Relationship and Inbreeding 5 Generations - Faust v. d. Mainauen
    This page shows the inbreeding calculations for the dog you selected or the "Test Mating" you have entered. The calculations on this page are accurate to the point that they can only be made based upon the information in the database. For more detailed calculations please make sure that as many ancestors as possible are entered to the database.

    COI Calculation - Faust v. d. Mainauen
    COI 5 gen: 0.391%    too low to be reliabe    Calculate COI again

    Please do the new calculation only if you have entered new ancestors of this dog!


    COI Calculation - Sire Hanno v. Emsdeich and Dam Bara v.d. Mainauen
    Sire: COI 5 gen: 0.000%    too low to be reliabe    Calculate COI again

    Dam: COI 5 gen: 0.000%    too low to be reliabe    Calculate COI again

    Ancestor-Loss coefficient (ALC)
    This method doesn't replace the calculation of the COI but also gives important information for the breeder. Ancestor-Loss is given when the same ancestor appears more than once in the pedigree of the dog. A 5-generations-pedigree shows 62 possible ancestors. If one of this 62 possible ancestors appears twice, the dog in question has indeed only 61 different ancestors. If 3 ancestors appear twice, this dog has indeed only 59 different ancestors. The ALC is calculated out of the nr. of the ancestors and the total nr. of possible ancestors.

    # of dogs
    Ancestors in 5 Generations (max. 62)61
    Ancestor Loss1
    Ancestor Loss in %98.39 %

    Contributing Ancestors
    AncestorBlood %# of appearances12345
    Hanno v. Emsdeich50.00011
    Bara v.d. Mainauen50.00011
    Greif v. Reitbach25.00011
    Debby v. Emsdeich25.00011
    Centa v. Kirschenberg25.00011
    Achill v.d. Krakequelle25.00011
    Rika v. Linduri12.50011
    Quell v. Huntetal12.50011
    Artus v. Elztal12.50011
    Denver v. d. Schmiede12.50011
    Farah v. Hilkefeld12.50011
    Arras v. Eschbach12.50011
    Perle v. Buchheim12.50011
    Akira v. Birkengehege12.50011
    Bautz v. d. Leda9.370211
    Dolly Nelha6.25011
    Laika v. Linduri6.25011
    Aury v. Waidbosch6.25011
    Distel v. Buchheim6.25011
    Gina v. Roonstein6.25011
    Nimrods Enno6.25011
    Dachs v. Wietensholt6.25011
    Arras v. Eikenloh6.25011
    Henk v. Huntetal6.25011
    Maika v. Wiken6.25011
    Bella v. Hanauer Land6.25011
    Amsel v. Silbergrund6.25011
    Bessy v. d. Schmiede6.25011
    Hajo Aus Grupilinga6.25011
    Elch v. Jägerkreuz6.25011
    Basko v. Bucheneck3.12011
    Branka v. d. Bärenklause3.12011
    Anja v. Salinenblick3.12011
    Emo v. Falkenhorst3.12011
    Derry v. Erlesberg3.12011
    Lukas v. Linduri3.12011
    Lukas De Wynen3.12011
    Lyra v. d. Königseiche3.12011
    Quacks v. Lossetal3.12011
    Conny v. Wietensholt3.12011
    Cäsar v. Elsternkamp3.12011
    Olly v. Bärenhorst3.12011
    Ondra v. Lossetal3.12011
    Baron v. Wietensholt3.12011
    Graf v. Silbersee3.12011
    Fango v. Nörderkamp3.12011
    Hesta v. Linduri3.12011
    Fenja v. Rethwischer Moor3.12011
    Gitta v. Lossetal3.12011
    Aika v. Buchwald3.12011
    Hecht v. d. Königseiche3.12011
    Esko v. Mühlenberg3.12011
    Antje v. Buchheim3.12011
    Tinka v. d. Bilsbek3.12011
    Lucie Nelha3.12011
    Laika v. d. Waterkant3.12011
    Cora v. Schäferbusch3.12011
    Jakob v. Sämmenhof3.12011
    Freya v. Roonstein3.12011
    Elch v. Hanauer Land3.12011
    Birke Nelha3.12011

    Last updated Wednesday 23 November 2022 20:32 CET



    I have 🍪s