Pedigree Analysis

    Generations

    Coefficients of Kinship, Relationship and Inbreeding 5 Generations - Erle v. Fränkischen Bauern
    This page shows the inbreeding calculations for the dog you selected or the "Test Mating" you have entered. The calculations on this page are accurate to the point that they can only be made based upon the information in the database. For more detailed calculations please make sure that as many ancestors as possible are entered to the database.

    COI Calculation - Erle v. Fränkischen Bauern
    COI 5 gen: 1.953%    very very low    Calculate COI again

    Please do the new calculation only if you have entered new ancestors of this dog!


    COI Calculation - Sire Ivo v. Lönsstein and Dam Cilly v. Fränkischen Bauern
    Sire: COI 5 gen: 0.439%    too low to be reliabe    Calculate COI again

    Dam: COI 5 gen: 0.586%    too low to be reliabe    Calculate COI again

    Ancestor-Loss coefficient (ALC)
    This method doesn't replace the calculation of the COI but also gives important information for the breeder. Ancestor-Loss is given when the same ancestor appears more than once in the pedigree of the dog. A 5-generations-pedigree shows 62 possible ancestors. If one of this 62 possible ancestors appears twice, the dog in question has indeed only 61 different ancestors. If 3 ancestors appear twice, this dog has indeed only 59 different ancestors. The ALC is calculated out of the nr. of the ancestors and the total nr. of possible ancestors.

    # of dogs
    Ancestors in 5 Generations (max. 62)57
    Ancestor Loss5
    Ancestor Loss in %91.94 %

    Contributing Ancestors
    AncestorBlood %# of appearances12345
    Cilly v. Fränkischen Bauern50.00011
    Ivo v. Lönsstein50.00011
    Anka v. Schönrain25.00011
    Jakob v. Sämmenhof25.00011
    Bautz v. d. Leda25.00011
    Unda v. Bärenhorst25.00011
    Graf v. Silbersee18.750211
    Gitta v. Lossetal12.50011
    Bodo v. d. Kummel12.50011
    Dixie v. Falkenhorst12.50011
    Asta v. Bartelskamp12.50011
    Zick v. Sämmenhof12.50011
    Lara v. Werlacke12.50011
    Graf Nelha12.50011
    Boss v. Silbersee9.370211
    Dolly v. Lossetal9.370211
    Uhl v. Lönsstein9.370211
    Asta v. Werlacke6.25011
    Britta v. Bärenhorst6.25011
    Gambo v. Werlacke6.25011
    Flocke v. d. Tränke6.25011
    Etzel v. Nörderkamp6.25011
    Hektor v. d. Lindenhöhe6.25011
    Vroni v. Sämmenhof6.25011
    Solojäger's Granne6.25011
    Asta v. Mönchsbrunnen6.25011
    Cindy v. Tenntal6.25011
    Cent v. Hofried6.25011
    Gero v. Wiken6.25011
    Asta v. Steinleite6.24022
    Bodo v. Weserstrand3.12011
    Anka v. d. Zirkelquelle3.12011
    Unda v. Lönsstein3.12011
    Enno Holsatia3.12011
    Becas v. Lönsstein3.12011
    Cent Graf v. Amelsbüren3.12011
    Alf v. Schinterkogel3.12011
    Condor v. d. Jägerhalle3.12011
    Natter v. Lönsstein3.12011
    Artus v. d. Hasewiesen3.12011
    Ria v. d. Böckelsburg3.12011
    Citta v. Langen Siek3.12011
    Asta v. Hofried3.12011
    Pascha v. d. Binnenelbe3.12011
    Gero v. Sämmenhof3.12011
    Nora v. d. Bärenburg3.12011
    Grandel v. d. Lindenhöhe3.12011
    Bobby v. Leefeld3.12011
    Bill v. Bessingslust3.12011
    Groll v. Reutherspfad3.12011
    Ino v. Kreyenhorst3.12011
    Hella v. Sämmenhof3.12011
    Fasko v. Reutherspfad3.12011
    Cita v. d. Tränke3.12011
    Delta v. Langen Siek3.12011
    Britta v. Lossetal3.12011
    Solojäger's Distel3.12011

    Last updated Wednesday 23 November 2022 20:32 CET



    I have 🍪s