Pedigree Analysis

    Generations

    Coefficients of Kinship, Relationship and Inbreeding 5 Generations - Lucky v. Heesenhof
    This page shows the inbreeding calculations for the dog you selected or the "Test Mating" you have entered. The calculations on this page are accurate to the point that they can only be made based upon the information in the database. For more detailed calculations please make sure that as many ancestors as possible are entered to the database.

    COI Calculation - Lucky v. Heesenhof
    COI 5 gen: 0.977%    too low to be reliabe    Calculate COI again

    Please do the new calculation only if you have entered new ancestors of this dog!


    COI Calculation - Sire Westfalen's Cuno and Dam Cora v. Mittelrhein
    Sire: COI 5 gen: 0.781%    too low to be reliabe    Calculate COI again

    Dam: COI 5 gen: 0.195%    too low to be reliabe    Calculate COI again

    Ancestor-Loss coefficient (ALC)
    This method doesn't replace the calculation of the COI but also gives important information for the breeder. Ancestor-Loss is given when the same ancestor appears more than once in the pedigree of the dog. A 5-generations-pedigree shows 62 possible ancestors. If one of this 62 possible ancestors appears twice, the dog in question has indeed only 61 different ancestors. If 3 ancestors appear twice, this dog has indeed only 59 different ancestors. The ALC is calculated out of the nr. of the ancestors and the total nr. of possible ancestors.

    # of dogs
    Ancestors in 5 Generations (max. 62)60
    Ancestor Loss2
    Ancestor Loss in %96.77 %

    Contributing Ancestors
    AncestorBlood %# of appearances12345
    Cora v. Mittelrhein50.00011
    Westfalen's Cuno50.00011
    Kira v. Tillplatz25.00011
    Kastor v. Wasserplatz25.00011
    Osca Aus Grupilinga25.00011
    Rena v. Elbufer25.00011
    Laura v. Poppenforst15.620211
    Dana v. Tillplatz12.50011
    Lukas v. Linduri12.50011
    Maja v. Elbufer12.50011
    Solojäger's Laura12.50011
    Arco v. Backemeer12.50011
    Dax v. Forst Ostenwalde12.50011
    Carlo v. Eulenhof12.50011
    Clerens v. Riedhauser Wald6.25011
    Natja v. d. Holzheide6.25011
    Olly v. Bärenhorst6.25011
    Hesta v. Linduri6.25011
    Bodo v. d. Kummel6.25011
    Anka v. Kappelbuck6.25011
    Hakon v. Forstgarten6.25011
    Solojäger's Harras6.25011
    Bella v. Tillplatz6.25011
    Dixi v. Elbufer6.25011
    Hera v. Wasserplatz6.25011
    Graf v. Silbersee6.25011
    Anke v. Keenmoor6.25011
    Jerome De Wynen6.25011
    Cim v. Wuddelhoff6.25011
    Hajo Aus Grupilinga6.25011
    Etzel v. Nörderkamp6.24022
    Biene v. Werhholz3.12011
    Anka v. Birkenhaus3.12011
    Andra v. Wuddelhoff3.12011
    Elch v. Hanauer Land3.12011
    Yalk De Wynen3.12011
    Cindy v. Bärenhorst3.12011
    Drossel v. d. Grassel3.12011
    Boss v. Silbersee3.12011
    Rena v. d. Binnenelbe3.12011
    Paris v. d. Waterkant3.12011
    Asta v. Bartelskamp3.12011
    Cäsar v. d. Zirkelquelle3.12011
    Groll Holsatia3.12011
    Cent v. Hasselbach3.12011
    Boss Holsatia3.12011
    Hektor v. d. Lindenhöhe3.12011
    Nimrod's Birko3.12011
    Tinka v. d. Bilsbek3.12011
    Drossel v. Hofried3.12011
    Dina v. Forstgarten3.12011
    Basko v. Bucheneck3.12011
    Lukas De Wynen3.12011
    Cindy v. Tenntal3.12011
    Nadja De Wynen3.12011
    Bautz v. d. Leda3.12011
    Ara v. Tillplatz3.12011
    Dolly v. Lossetal3.12011
    Niklas De Wynen3.12011
    Solojäger's Distel3.12011

    Last updated Wednesday 23 November 2022 20:32 CET



    I have 🍪s