Pedigree Analysis

    Generations

    Coefficients of Kinship, Relationship and Inbreeding 5 Generations - Caja (Jens Sørensen)
    This page shows the inbreeding calculations for the dog you selected or the "Test Mating" you have entered. The calculations on this page are accurate to the point that they can only be made based upon the information in the database. For more detailed calculations please make sure that as many ancestors as possible are entered to the database.

    COI Calculation - Caja (Jens Sørensen)
    COI 5 gen: 2.344%    very low    Calculate COI again

    Please do the new calculation only if you have entered new ancestors of this dog!


    COI Calculation - Sire Gandhi v. Bussenhof and Dam Ida v. Frochtmannshof
    Sire: COI 5 gen: 1.953%    very very low    Calculate COI again

    Dam: COI 5 gen: 6.543%    low    Calculate COI again

    Ancestor-Loss coefficient (ALC)
    This method doesn't replace the calculation of the COI but also gives important information for the breeder. Ancestor-Loss is given when the same ancestor appears more than once in the pedigree of the dog. A 5-generations-pedigree shows 62 possible ancestors. If one of this 62 possible ancestors appears twice, the dog in question has indeed only 61 different ancestors. If 3 ancestors appear twice, this dog has indeed only 59 different ancestors. The ALC is calculated out of the nr. of the ancestors and the total nr. of possible ancestors.

    # of dogs
    Ancestors in 5 Generations (max. 62)55
    Ancestor Loss7
    Ancestor Loss in %88.71 %

    Contributing Ancestors
    AncestorBlood %# of appearances12345
    Gandhi v. Bussenhof50.00011
    Ida v. Frochtmannshof50.00011
    Aron v. Averbeck25.000312
    Eika v. Frochtmannshof25.00011
    Osca Aus Grupilinga25.00011
    Cilly v. Hollbäck25.00011
    Asso v. Jeddeloher Esch25.00011
    Fina v. Neuenkämpen12.50011
    Aska v. Forstkamp12.50011
    Quinta v. Fasanenhof12.50011
    Solojäger's Laura12.50011
    Dax v. Forst Ostenwalde12.50011
    Coach v. Ziegelweiher12.50011
    Askan v. d. Klosterwiese12.50011
    Cliff v. Fränkischen Bauern12.490312
    Gitta v. d. Wallburg12.490312
    Hajo Aus Grupilinga9.370211
    Cim v. Wuddelhoff6.25011
    Dina v. Neuenkämpen6.25011
    Dina v. d. Himmerner Heide6.25011
    Artos v. d. Schirmkiefer6.25011
    Burga v. d. Heustätte6.25011
    Westfalen's Birka6.25011
    Meika v. Wasserplatz6.25011
    Solojäger's Harras6.25011
    Hera v. Wasserplatz6.25011
    Juwel v. Perverberg6.25011
    Arras v. Eschbach6.25011
    Solojäger's Distel3.12011
    Jako v. Fasanenhof3.12011
    Birka v. d. Hirtenburg3.12011
    Gauner v. Stockey3.12011
    Nimrod's Birko3.12011
    Kira v. Tillplatz3.12011
    Gina v. Roonstein3.12011
    Anka v. Schönrain3.12011
    Grille v. Lönsstein3.12011
    Alice v. Wiebusch3.12011
    Hasko v. Linebrok3.12011
    Alicia v. d. Heustätte3.12011
    Andra v. Wuddelhoff3.12011
    Anka v. Raddetal3.12011
    Arras v. Eikenloh3.12011
    Jakob v. Sämmenhof3.12011
    Elch v. Hanauer Land3.12011
    Linda v. Fasanenhof3.12011
    Dixie v. Wasserplatz3.12011
    Basko v. Bucheneck3.12011
    Tinka v. d. Bilsbek3.12011
    Uri v. Bärenhorst3.12011
    Don v. Forst Ostenwalde3.12011
    Bautz v. d. Leda3.12011
    Arco v. Backemeer3.12011
    Gordon v. d. Hafkesdell3.12011
    Laura v. Poppenforst3.12011

    Last updated Wednesday 23 November 2022 20:32 CET



    I have 🍪s