Pedigree Analysis

Generations

Coefficients of Kinship, Relationship and Inbreeding 5 Generations - Caja (Jens Sørensen)

This page shows the inbreeding calculations for the dog you selected or the "Test Mating" you have entered. The calculations on this page are accurate to the point that they can only be made based upon the information in the database. For more detailed calculations please make sure that as many ancestors as possible are entered to the database.

COI Calculation - Caja (Jens Sørensen)

COI 5 gen: 2.344%    very low    Calculate COI again

Please do the new calculation only if you have entered new ancestors of this dog!

COI Calculation - Sire Gandhi v. Bussenhof and Dam Ida v. Frochtmannshof

Sire: COI 5 gen: 1.953%    very very low    Calculate COI again

Dam: COI 5 gen: 6.543%    low    Calculate COI again

Ancestor-Loss coefficient (ALC)

This method doesn't replace the calculation of the COI but also gives important information for the breeder. Ancestor-Loss is given when the same ancestor appears more than once in the pedigree of the dog. A 5-generations-pedigree shows 62 possible ancestors. If one of this 62 possible ancestors appears twice, the dog in question has indeed only 61 different ancestors. If 3 ancestors appear twice, this dog has indeed only 59 different ancestors. The ALC is calculated out of the nr. of the ancestors and the total nr. of possible ancestors.

# of dogs
Ancestors in 5 Generations (max. 62)55
Ancestor Loss7
Ancestor Loss in %88.71 %

Contributing Ancestors

AncestorBlood %# of appearances12345
Ida v. Frochtmannshof50.00011
Gandhi v. Bussenhof50.00011
Cilly v. Hollbäck25.00011
Asso v. Jeddeloher Esch25.00011
Aron v. Averbeck25.000312
Osca Aus Grupilinga25.00011
Eika v. Frochtmannshof25.00011
Quinta v. Fasanenhof12.50011
Solojäger's Laura12.50011
Dax v. Forst Ostenwalde12.50011
Coach v. Ziegelweiher12.50011
Askan v. d. Klosterwiese12.50011
Aska v. Forstkamp12.50011
Fina v. Neuenkämpen12.50011
Cliff v. Fränkischen Bauern12.490312
Gitta v. d. Wallburg12.490312
Hajo Aus Grupilinga9.370211
Dina v. Neuenkämpen6.25011
Dina v. d. Himmerner Heide6.25011
Artos v. d. Schirmkiefer6.25011
Burga v. d. Heustätte6.25011
Westfalen's Birka6.25011
Meika v. Wasserplatz6.25011
Solojäger's Harras6.25011
Hera v. Wasserplatz6.25011
Juwel v. Perverberg6.25011
Arras v. Eschbach6.25011
Cim v. Wuddelhoff6.25011
Anka v. Schönrain3.12011
Grille v. Lönsstein3.12011
Alice v. Wiebusch3.12011
Hasko v. Linebrok3.12011
Andra v. Wuddelhoff3.12011
Anka v. Raddetal3.12011
Arras v. Eikenloh3.12011
Jakob v. Sämmenhof3.12011
Elch v. Hanauer Land3.12011
Alicia v. d. Heustätte3.12011
Linda v. Fasanenhof3.12011
Dixie v. Wasserplatz3.12011
Basko v. Bucheneck3.12011
Tinka v. d. Bilsbek3.12011
Uri v. Bärenhorst3.12011
Don v. Forst Ostenwalde3.12011
Bautz v. d. Leda3.12011
Arco v. Backemeer3.12011
Gordon v. d. Hafkesdell3.12011
Laura v. Poppenforst3.12011
Solojäger's Distel3.12011
Jako v. Fasanenhof3.12011
Birka v. d. Hirtenburg3.12011
Gauner v. Stockey3.12011
Nimrod's Birko3.12011
Kira v. Tillplatz3.12011
Gina v. Roonstein3.12011
Last updated Tuesday 19 March 2019 08:59 CET


I have 🍪s