Pedigree Analysis

    Generations

    Coefficients of Kinship, Relationship and Inbreeding 5 Generations - Isolde v. Alten Hafen
    This page shows the inbreeding calculations for the dog you selected or the "Test Mating" you have entered. The calculations on this page are accurate to the point that they can only be made based upon the information in the database. For more detailed calculations please make sure that as many ancestors as possible are entered to the database.

    COI Calculation - Isolde v. Alten Hafen
    COI 5 gen: 0.195%    too low to be reliabe    Calculate COI again

    Please do the new calculation only if you have entered new ancestors of this dog!


    COI Calculation - Sire Arco v. Backemeer and Dam Fee v. Alten Hafen
    Sire: COI 5 gen: 1.172%    very very low    Calculate COI again

    Dam: COI 5 gen: 1.758%    very very low    Calculate COI again

    Ancestor-Loss coefficient (ALC)
    This method doesn't replace the calculation of the COI but also gives important information for the breeder. Ancestor-Loss is given when the same ancestor appears more than once in the pedigree of the dog. A 5-generations-pedigree shows 62 possible ancestors. If one of this 62 possible ancestors appears twice, the dog in question has indeed only 61 different ancestors. If 3 ancestors appear twice, this dog has indeed only 59 different ancestors. The ALC is calculated out of the nr. of the ancestors and the total nr. of possible ancestors.

    # of dogs
    Ancestors in 5 Generations (max. 62)59
    Ancestor Loss3
    Ancestor Loss in %95.16 %

    Contributing Ancestors
    AncestorBlood %# of appearances12345
    Arco v. Backemeer50.00011
    Fee v. Alten Hafen50.00011
    Dandy v. Roonstein25.00011
    Hakon v. Forstgarten25.00011
    Asja v. Alten Hafen25.00011
    Anke v. Keenmoor25.00011
    Anka v. Birkenhaus12.50011
    Etzel v. Nörderkamp12.50011
    Chico v. Borgkamp12.50011
    Bine v. Sünnekenbusch12.50011
    Vella v. Fährhaus12.50011
    Dina v. Forstgarten12.50011
    Eiko v. Weithof12.50011
    Cent v. Hasselbach12.50011
    Ass v. d. Schlei6.25011
    Orlo v. d. Overbecker Mühle6.25011
    Esko Vun'N Wischhoff6.25011
    Laila v. d. Overbecker Mühle6.25011
    Artus v. d. Hasewiesen6.25011
    Cora v. Bärenhorst6.25011
    Lord v. Schadwalde6.25011
    Ria v. d. Böckelsburg6.25011
    Diwa v. Kampstüh6.25011
    Freya v. Steinroden6.25011
    Xari v. Wolfsgrund6.25011
    Cäsar v. d. Hohen Geest6.25011
    Elvi v. Lossetal6.25011
    Babsy v. Weberhof6.25011
    King v. Fährhaus6.25011
    Ova v. Fährhaus6.25011
    Jenka v. d. Overbecker Mühle6.24022
    Wido v. Schwege6.24022
    Ajax v. Klockhof6.24022
    Afra v. Elisenhof3.12011
    Ingo v. Schadwalde3.12011
    Beste v. Lönsstein3.12011
    Birko v. Holsatia3.12011
    Zent v. Feuersang3.12011
    Etzel v. Sämmenhof3.12011
    Tim v. Feuersang3.12011
    Flocke v. d. Tränke3.12011
    Whisky v. Schwege3.12011
    Alard v. d. Leda3.12011
    Benn v. Moorkamp3.12011
    Karla v. Lönsstein3.12011
    Cora v. Tannenkamp3.12011
    Sonja v. Lönsstein3.12011
    Olli v. d. Böckelsburg3.12011
    Adda v. Wetternwege3.12011
    Uhl v. Lönsstein3.12011
    Groll v. Reutherspfad3.12011
    Basko v. Neuenhof3.12011
    Imme v. Feuersang3.12011
    Gina Dankwarder Ode3.12011
    Amsel v. d. Leda3.12011
    Unda v. Lönsstein3.12011
    Elko v. Turkenweg3.12011
    Anke v. Birkenhof3.12011
    Biene v. Ringofen3.12011

    Last updated Wednesday 23 November 2022 20:32 CET



    I have 🍪s