Pedigree Analysis

    Generations

    Coefficients of Kinship, Relationship and Inbreeding 5 Generations - Auguste v. Eulenspiegel
    This page shows the inbreeding calculations for the dog you selected or the "Test Mating" you have entered. The calculations on this page are accurate to the point that they can only be made based upon the information in the database. For more detailed calculations please make sure that as many ancestors as possible are entered to the database.

    COI Calculation - Auguste v. Eulenspiegel
    COI 5 gen: 0.000%    too low to be reliabe    Calculate COI again

    Please do the new calculation only if you have entered new ancestors of this dog!


    COI Calculation - Sire Arko v. Deutschen Orden and Dam Isolde v. Alten Hafen
    Sire: COI 5 gen: 3.320%    very low    Calculate COI again

    Dam: COI 5 gen: 0.195%    too low to be reliabe    Calculate COI again

    Ancestor-Loss coefficient (ALC)
    This method doesn't replace the calculation of the COI but also gives important information for the breeder. Ancestor-Loss is given when the same ancestor appears more than once in the pedigree of the dog. A 5-generations-pedigree shows 62 possible ancestors. If one of this 62 possible ancestors appears twice, the dog in question has indeed only 61 different ancestors. If 3 ancestors appear twice, this dog has indeed only 59 different ancestors. The ALC is calculated out of the nr. of the ancestors and the total nr. of possible ancestors.

    # of dogs
    Ancestors in 5 Generations (max. 62)59
    Ancestor Loss3
    Ancestor Loss in %95.16 %

    Contributing Ancestors
    AncestorBlood %# of appearances12345
    Isolde v. Alten Hafen50.00011
    Arko v. Deutschen Orden50.00011
    Arco v. Backemeer25.00011
    Fee v. Alten Hafen25.00011
    Gitta v. Buchheim25.00011
    Lord v. Jurawald25.00011
    Dandy v. Roonstein12.50011
    Gwenda v. Jurawald12.50011
    Dax Nelha12.50011
    Hakon v. Forstgarten12.50011
    Distel v. Buchheim12.50011
    Asja v. Alten Hafen12.50011
    Axel v. d. Lechmündung12.50011
    Anke v. Keenmoor12.50011
    Jakob v. Sämmenhof12.50022
    Birke Nelha6.25011
    Fara v. Friedleinsgrund6.25011
    Cent v. Hasselbach6.25011
    Dux v. Falkenhorst6.25011
    Daisy v. Sämmenhof6.25011
    Quacks v. Lossetal6.25011
    Anka v. Birkenhaus6.25011
    Bine v. Sünnekenbusch6.25011
    Etzel v. Nörderkamp6.25011
    Chico v. Borgkamp6.25011
    Eiko v. Weithof6.25011
    Dina v. Forstgarten6.25011
    Vella v. Fährhaus6.25011
    Antje v. Buchheim6.25011
    Lara v. Werlacke6.24022
    Zick v. Sämmenhof6.24022
    Asta v. Mönchsbrunnen3.12011
    Esko Vun'N Wischhoff3.12011
    Alf v. d. Waterkant3.12011
    Cessy v. Sämmenhof3.12011
    King v. Fährhaus3.12011
    Cora v. Bärenhorst3.12011
    Graf v. Silbersee3.12011
    Nixe v. Lossetal3.12011
    Laila v. d. Overbecker Mühle3.12011
    Orlo v. d. Overbecker Mühle3.12011
    Ria v. d. Böckelsburg3.12011
    Kasper Vun'N. Wischhoff3.12011
    Cäsar v. d. Hohen Geest3.12011
    Diwa v. Kampstüh3.12011
    Cliff v. Linduri3.12011
    Babsy v. Weberhof3.12011
    Freya v. Steinroden3.12011
    Xari v. Wolfsgrund3.12011
    Arko v. Kammerforst3.12011
    Ass v. d. Schlei3.12011
    Artemis v. d. Wandelburg3.12011
    Artus v. d. Hasewiesen3.12011
    Ova v. Fährhaus3.12011
    Eike v. Lossetal3.12011
    Carla v. Sämmenhof3.12011
    Lord v. Schadwalde3.12011
    Lukas De Wynen3.12011
    Elvi v. Lossetal3.12011

    Last updated Wednesday 23 November 2022 20:32 CET



    I have 🍪s