Pedigree Analysis

    Generations

    Coefficients of Kinship, Relationship and Inbreeding 5 Generations - Greif v. Reitbach
    This page shows the inbreeding calculations for the dog you selected or the "Test Mating" you have entered. The calculations on this page are accurate to the point that they can only be made based upon the information in the database. For more detailed calculations please make sure that as many ancestors as possible are entered to the database.

    COI Calculation - Greif v. Reitbach
    COI 5 gen: 0.000%    too low to be reliabe    Calculate COI again

    Please do the new calculation only if you have entered new ancestors of this dog!


    COI Calculation - Sire Arras v. Eschbach and Dam Rika v. Linduri
    Sire: COI 5 gen: 0.195%    too low to be reliabe    Calculate COI again

    Dam: COI 5 gen: 0.000%    too low to be reliabe    Calculate COI again

    Ancestor-Loss coefficient (ALC)
    This method doesn't replace the calculation of the COI but also gives important information for the breeder. Ancestor-Loss is given when the same ancestor appears more than once in the pedigree of the dog. A 5-generations-pedigree shows 62 possible ancestors. If one of this 62 possible ancestors appears twice, the dog in question has indeed only 61 different ancestors. If 3 ancestors appear twice, this dog has indeed only 59 different ancestors. The ALC is calculated out of the nr. of the ancestors and the total nr. of possible ancestors.

    # of dogs
    Ancestors in 5 Generations (max. 62)61
    Ancestor Loss1
    Ancestor Loss in %98.39 %

    Contributing Ancestors
    AncestorBlood %# of appearances12345
    Arras v. Eschbach50.00011
    Rika v. Linduri50.00011
    Bautz v. d. Leda25.00011
    Gina v. Roonstein25.00011
    Amsel v. Silbergrund25.00011
    Arras v. Eikenloh25.00011
    Cora v. Schäferbusch12.50011
    Freya v. Roonstein12.50011
    Graf v. Silbersee12.50011
    Derry v. Erlesberg12.50011
    Cäsar v. Elsternkamp12.50011
    Gitta v. Lossetal12.50011
    Lukas v. Linduri12.50011
    Lucie Nelha12.50011
    Gustel v. d. Kiefhornsmühle6.25011
    Faro v. d. Falkenweiden6.25011
    Hesta v. Linduri6.25011
    Uhl v. Lönsstein6.25011
    Dandy v. Roonstein6.25011
    Flocke v. d. Tränke6.25011
    Joe v. Fasanenhof6.25011
    Boss v. Silbersee6.25011
    Locke Frankundfrei6.25011
    Hella v. d. Lindenhöhe6.25011
    Alo v. Burgstall6.25011
    Biene v. Siegbogen6.25011
    Jenny v. Huckberg6.25011
    Dolly v. Lossetal6.25011
    Olly v. Bärenhorst6.25011
    Solojäger's Granne6.25011
    Eiko v. Weithof6.24022
    Berry v. Nordpark3.12011
    Ino v. Kreyenhorst3.12011
    Britta v. Lossetal3.12011
    Paris v. d. Waterkant3.12011
    Josi v. Königsfeld3.12011
    Cita v. d. Tränke3.12011
    Gero Frankundfrei3.12011
    Alf v. Wachtelrangen3.12011
    Solojäger's Distel3.12011
    Bodo v. Weserstrand3.12011
    Grandel v. d. Lindenhöhe3.12011
    Bine v. Sünnekenbusch3.12011
    Hasso v. Langen Siek3.12011
    Becas v. Lönsstein3.12011
    Cent Graf v. Amelsbüren3.12011
    Groll v. Reutherspfad3.12011
    Benno v. d. Haalquelle3.12011
    Drossel v. d. Grassel3.12011
    Asta v. Bartelskamp3.12011
    Natter v. Lönsstein3.12011
    Cindy v. d. Kiefhornsmühle3.12011
    Citta v. Langen Siek3.12011
    Cilli v. Grünen Wege3.12011
    Etzel v. Nörderkamp3.12011
    Britta v. d. Schwarzen Brücke3.12011
    Ilse v. Fasanenhof3.12011
    Bill v. Bessingslust3.12011
    Dona v. Jägerhalle3.12011
    Solojäger's Anka3.12011
    Onko v. Tecklenburg3.12011

    Last updated Wednesday 23 November 2022 20:32 CET



    I have 🍪s