Pedigree Analysis

    Generations

    Coefficients of Kinship, Relationship and Inbreeding 5 Generations - Hanko v. Wasserplatz
    This page shows the inbreeding calculations for the dog you selected or the "Test Mating" you have entered. The calculations on this page are accurate to the point that they can only be made based upon the information in the database. For more detailed calculations please make sure that as many ancestors as possible are entered to the database.

    COI Calculation - Hanko v. Wasserplatz
    COI 5 gen: 1.172%    very very low    Calculate COI again

    Please do the new calculation only if you have entered new ancestors of this dog!


    COI Calculation - Sire Elch v. Hanauer Land and Dam Laura v. Poppenforst
    Sire: COI 5 gen: 0.781%    too low to be reliabe    Calculate COI again

    Dam: COI 5 gen: 8.398%    low    Calculate COI again

    Ancestor-Loss coefficient (ALC)
    This method doesn't replace the calculation of the COI but also gives important information for the breeder. Ancestor-Loss is given when the same ancestor appears more than once in the pedigree of the dog. A 5-generations-pedigree shows 62 possible ancestors. If one of this 62 possible ancestors appears twice, the dog in question has indeed only 61 different ancestors. If 3 ancestors appear twice, this dog has indeed only 59 different ancestors. The ALC is calculated out of the nr. of the ancestors and the total nr. of possible ancestors.

    # of dogs
    Ancestors in 5 Generations (max. 62)63
    Ancestor Loss-1
    Ancestor Loss in %101.61 %

    Contributing Ancestors
    AncestorBlood %# of appearances12345
    Elch v. Hanauer Land50.00011
    Gero v. Veybach50.00011
    Laura v. Poppenforst50.00011
    Solojäger's Yv50.00011
    Bodo v. d. Hasenheide25.00011
    Amy v. Hollbäck25.00011
    Aika v. Buchwald25.00011
    Orkan v. Linebrok25.00011
    Natja v. d. Holzheide25.00011
    Jerome De Wynen25.00011
    Jenny De Wynen12.50022
    Cora v. Holmesborn12.50011
    Yalk De Wynen12.50011
    Olga v. Bärenhorst12.50011
    Cliff v. Linduri12.50011
    Osca Aus Grupilinga12.50011
    Lara v. Linebrok12.50011
    Cindy v. Bärenhorst12.50011
    Graf v. Silbersee12.50011
    Nadja De Wynen12.50011
    Niklas De Wynen12.50011
    Aska v. Forstkamp12.50011
    Irrwisch De Wynen12.50022
    Utz v. Lönsstein12.490312
    Groll v. Reutherspfad9.370211
    Xandra v. Lönsstein9.36033
    Drossel v. d. Grassel6.25011
    Etzel v. Nörderkamp6.25011
    Hesto v. Werlacke6.25011
    Artos v. d. Schirmkiefer6.25011
    Dolly v. Lossetal6.25011
    Solojäger's Laura6.25011
    Meika v. Wasserplatz6.25011
    Unda v. Lönsstein6.25011
    Rachel De Wynen6.25011
    Dax v. Forst Ostenwalde6.25011
    Boss v. Silbersee6.25011
    Paris v. d. Waterkant6.25011
    Asta v. Bartelskamp6.25011
    Catja v. Niddatal6.25011
    Boro v. Silbersee6.24022
    Asta v. Werlacke6.24022
    Hazel De Wynen6.24022
    Gambo v. Werlacke3.12011
    Bobby v. Leefeld3.12011
    Citta v. Langen Siek3.12011
    Cai Holsatia3.12011
    Arco v. Reutherspfad3.12011
    Artus v. d. Hasewiesen3.12011
    Britta v. Lossetal3.12011
    Ino v. Kreyenhorst3.12011
    Astor v. d. Weide3.12011
    Bodo v. Weserstrand3.12011
    Britta v. Bärenhorst3.12011
    Gero v. Wiken3.12011
    Heidi v. Lönsstein3.12011
    Boss Holsatia3.12011
    Cent Graf v. Amelsbüren3.12011
    Ines v. d. Waterkant3.12011
    Ria v. d. Böckelsburg3.12011
    Janka v. Holmesborn3.12011
    Britta v. Hasselbach3.12011
    Natter v. Lönsstein3.12011

    Last updated Wednesday 23 November 2022 20:32 CET



    I have 🍪s