Pedigree Analysis

    Generations

    Coefficients of Kinship, Relationship and Inbreeding 5 Generations - Arko v. Fliethbachtal
    This page shows the inbreeding calculations for the dog you selected or the "Test Mating" you have entered. The calculations on this page are accurate to the point that they can only be made based upon the information in the database. For more detailed calculations please make sure that as many ancestors as possible are entered to the database.

    COI Calculation - Arko v. Fliethbachtal
    COI 5 gen: 2.441%    very low    Calculate COI again

    Please do the new calculation only if you have entered new ancestors of this dog!


    COI Calculation - Sire Elch v. Hanauer Land and Dam Bonny v. Brückhof
    Sire: COI 5 gen: 0.781%    too low to be reliabe    Calculate COI again

    Dam: COI 5 gen: 0.000%    too low to be reliabe    Calculate COI again

    Ancestor-Loss coefficient (ALC)
    This method doesn't replace the calculation of the COI but also gives important information for the breeder. Ancestor-Loss is given when the same ancestor appears more than once in the pedigree of the dog. A 5-generations-pedigree shows 62 possible ancestors. If one of this 62 possible ancestors appears twice, the dog in question has indeed only 61 different ancestors. If 3 ancestors appear twice, this dog has indeed only 59 different ancestors. The ALC is calculated out of the nr. of the ancestors and the total nr. of possible ancestors.

    # of dogs
    Ancestors in 5 Generations (max. 62)56
    Ancestor Loss6
    Ancestor Loss in %90.32 %

    Contributing Ancestors
    AncestorBlood %# of appearances12345
    Elch v. Hanauer Land50.00011
    Bonny v. Brückhof50.00011
    Bodo v. d. Hasenheide25.00011
    Corda v. Schatzrain25.00011
    Esko v. Huntetal25.00011
    Aika v. Buchwald25.00011
    Etzel v. Nörderkamp18.750211
    Cora v. Holmesborn12.50011
    Olga v. Bärenhorst12.50011
    Alka v. Erlesberg12.50011
    Laika v. d. Waterkant12.50011
    Cliff v. Linduri12.50011
    Graf v. Silbersee12.50011
    Elch v. Jägerkreuz12.50011
    Artus v. d. Hasewiesen9.370211
    Ines v. d. Waterkant9.370211
    Boss v. Silbersee9.370211
    Ria v. d. Böckelsburg9.370211
    Bob v. d. Schlei6.25011
    Asta v. Bartelskamp6.25011
    Flott Frankundfrei6.25011
    Hella v. d. Lindenhöhe6.25011
    Hecht v. d. Königseiche6.25011
    Anja v. Salinenblick6.25011
    Dolly v. Lossetal6.25011
    Utz v. Lönsstein6.25011
    Paris v. d. Waterkant6.25011
    Catja v. Niddatal6.25011
    Drossel v. d. Grassel6.25011
    Ajax v. Klockhof6.24022
    Citta v. Langen Siek3.12011
    Groll v. Reutherspfad3.12011
    Britta v. Hasselbach3.12011
    Ino v. Kreyenhorst3.12011
    Ingo v. Schadwalde3.12011
    Achill v. Jagello3.12011
    Cilly v. Waterkant3.12011
    Bill v. Bessingslust3.12011
    Uhl v. Lönsstein3.12011
    Bodo v. Weserstrand3.12011
    Cora v. Tannenkamp3.12011
    Britta v. Lossetal3.12011
    Cent Graf v. Amelsbüren3.12011
    Rasso v. Lönsstein3.12011
    Boss Holsatia3.12011
    Astor v. d. Weide3.12011
    Janka v. Holmesborn3.12011
    Britta v. Bärenhorst3.12011
    Gero v. Wiken3.12011
    Olli v. d. Böckelsburg3.12011
    Anke v. Birkenhof3.12011
    Cora v. Lindenbauer3.12011
    Grandel v. d. Lindenhöhe3.12011
    Gundi v. d. Königseiche3.12011
    Natter v. Lönsstein3.12011
    Hussa v. Rheinufer3.12011

    Last updated Wednesday 23 November 2022 20:32 CET



    I have 🍪s