Pedigree Analysis

    Generations

    Coefficients of Kinship, Relationship and Inbreeding 5 Generations - Ondra v. Stockey
    This page shows the inbreeding calculations for the dog you selected or the "Test Mating" you have entered. The calculations on this page are accurate to the point that they can only be made based upon the information in the database. For more detailed calculations please make sure that as many ancestors as possible are entered to the database.

    COI Calculation - Ondra v. Stockey
    COI 5 gen: 0.586%    too low to be reliabe    Calculate COI again

    Please do the new calculation only if you have entered new ancestors of this dog!


    COI Calculation - Sire Arko v. Fliethbachtal and Dam Gusti v. Stockey
    Sire: COI 5 gen: 2.441%    very low    Calculate COI again

    Dam: COI 5 gen: 1.367%    very very low    Calculate COI again

    Ancestor-Loss coefficient (ALC)
    This method doesn't replace the calculation of the COI but also gives important information for the breeder. Ancestor-Loss is given when the same ancestor appears more than once in the pedigree of the dog. A 5-generations-pedigree shows 62 possible ancestors. If one of this 62 possible ancestors appears twice, the dog in question has indeed only 61 different ancestors. If 3 ancestors appear twice, this dog has indeed only 59 different ancestors. The ALC is calculated out of the nr. of the ancestors and the total nr. of possible ancestors.

    # of dogs
    Ancestors in 5 Generations (max. 62)60
    Ancestor Loss2
    Ancestor Loss in %96.77 %

    Contributing Ancestors
    AncestorBlood %# of appearances12345
    Gusti v. Stockey50.00011
    Arko v. Fliethbachtal50.00011
    Evita v. Stockey25.00011
    Elch v. Hanauer Land25.00011
    Alex v. Bannwald25.00011
    Bonny v. Brückhof25.00011
    Bodo v. d. Hasenheide12.50011
    Corda v. Schatzrain12.50011
    Solojäger's Harras12.50011
    Esko v. Huntetal12.50011
    Branca v. d. Biberquelle12.50011
    Asco Westerode12.50011
    Chica v. d. Hafkesdell12.50011
    Aika v. Buchwald12.50011
    Etzel v. Nörderkamp9.370211
    Cliff v. Linduri9.370211
    Zick v. Sämmenhof6.25011
    Elch v. Jägerkreuz6.25011
    Solojäger's Distel6.25011
    Becas v. Lönsstein6.25011
    Laika v. d. Waterkant6.25011
    Olga v. Bärenhorst6.25011
    Dina Chamavia6.25011
    Amber De Wynen6.25011
    Nimrod's Birko6.25011
    Cora v. Holmesborn6.25011
    Alf v. Siegbogen6.25011
    Graf v. Silbersee6.25011
    Alka v. Erlesberg6.25011
    Afra v. d. Bohlsener Mühle6.25011
    Cent v. Hofried3.12011
    Hella v. d. Lindenhöhe3.12011
    Priska De Wynen3.12011
    Uta Chamavia3.12011
    Vroni v. Sämmenhof3.12011
    Drossel v. d. Grassel3.12011
    Cita v. Winterberg3.12011
    Artus v. d. Hasewiesen3.12011
    Flott Frankundfrei3.12011
    Dolly v. Lossetal3.12011
    Lyra v. d. Königseiche3.12011
    Erko v. Jahnplatz3.12011
    Anja v. Salinenblick3.12011
    Hecht v. d. Königseiche3.12011
    Baldur v. Lönsstein3.12011
    Boss v. Silbersee3.12011
    Bob v. d. Schlei3.12011
    Bautz v. Mönchsbrunnen3.12011
    Harro v. Lossetal3.12011
    Carmen v. d. Nordmannstannen3.12011
    Asta v. Bartelskamp3.12011
    Utz v. Lönsstein3.12011
    Alf v. Rauhen Ebrach Tal3.12011
    Paris v. d. Waterkant3.12011
    Josi v. Königsfeld3.12011
    Ines v. d. Waterkant3.12011
    Ria v. d. Böckelsburg3.12011
    Edda v. Jurawald3.12011
    Catja v. Niddatal3.12011
    Hektor v. d. Lindenhöhe3.12011

    Last updated Wednesday 23 November 2022 20:32 CET



    I have 🍪s