Pedigree Analysis

    Generations

    Coefficients of Kinship, Relationship and Inbreeding 5 Generations - Yda v. d. Binnenelbe
    This page shows the inbreeding calculations for the dog you selected or the "Test Mating" you have entered. The calculations on this page are accurate to the point that they can only be made based upon the information in the database. For more detailed calculations please make sure that as many ancestors as possible are entered to the database.

    COI Calculation - Yda v. d. Binnenelbe
    COI 5 gen: 0.391%    too low to be reliabe    Calculate COI again

    Please do the new calculation only if you have entered new ancestors of this dog!


    COI Calculation - Sire Castor v. d. Hirtenburg and Dam Gabi v.d. Röthaller
    Sire: COI 5 gen: 1.562%    very very low    Calculate COI again

    Dam: COI 5 gen: 3.125%    very low    Calculate COI again

    Ancestor-Loss coefficient (ALC)
    This method doesn't replace the calculation of the COI but also gives important information for the breeder. Ancestor-Loss is given when the same ancestor appears more than once in the pedigree of the dog. A 5-generations-pedigree shows 62 possible ancestors. If one of this 62 possible ancestors appears twice, the dog in question has indeed only 61 different ancestors. If 3 ancestors appear twice, this dog has indeed only 59 different ancestors. The ALC is calculated out of the nr. of the ancestors and the total nr. of possible ancestors.

    # of dogs
    Ancestors in 5 Generations (max. 62)57
    Ancestor Loss5
    Ancestor Loss in %91.94 %

    Contributing Ancestors
    AncestorBlood %# of appearances12345
    Gabi v.d. Röthaller50.00011
    Castor v. d. Hirtenburg50.00011
    Cina v. d. Röthaller25.00011
    Horrik v. Wasserplatz25.00011
    Tina v. d. Bilsbek25.00011
    Mirco v. Linduri25.00011
    Wanda v. d. Binnenelbe12.50011
    Bobby v. d. Hasenheide12.50011
    Asra v. Eulenhof12.50011
    Amsel v. Silbergrund12.50011
    Bautz v. d. Leda12.50011
    Elch v. Hanauer Land12.50011
    Laura v. Poppenforst12.50011
    Chico v. Borgkamp12.50011
    Olga v. Bärenhorst9.370211
    Cliff v. Linduri9.370211
    Graf v. Silbersee9.370211
    Gitta v. Lossetal6.25011
    Jerome De Wynen6.25011
    Cent v. Hasselbach6.25011
    Bodo v. d. Hasenheide6.25011
    Xari v. Wolfsgrund6.25011
    Maestro De Wynen6.25011
    Anka v. Kappelbuck6.25011
    Aika v. Buchwald6.25011
    Cora v. Schäferbusch6.25011
    Elvi v. Lossetal6.25011
    Bessi v. Winterberg6.25011
    Derry v. Erlesberg6.25011
    Natja v. d. Holzheide6.25011
    Uhl v. Lönsstein6.24022
    Flocke v. d. Tränke6.24022
    Ass v. d. Schlei3.12011
    Drossel v. Hofried3.12011
    Drossel v. d. Grassel3.12011
    Cora v. Holmesborn3.12011
    Sonja v. Lönsstein3.12011
    Esko Vun'N Wischhoff3.12011
    Gustel v. d. Kiefhornsmühle3.12011
    Locke Frankundfrei3.12011
    Cäsar v. d. Zirkelquelle3.12011
    Cindy v. Bärenhorst3.12011
    Paris v. d. Waterkant3.12011
    Etzel v. Nörderkamp3.12011
    Wido v. Schwege3.12011
    Ute v. Lönsstein3.12011
    Asta v. Rauhen Ebrach Tal3.12011
    Faro v. d. Falkenweiden3.12011
    Yalk De Wynen3.12011
    Boss v. Silbersee3.12011
    Falko v. d. Tränke3.12011
    Hella v. d. Lindenhöhe3.12011
    Asta v. Bartelskamp3.12011
    Nadja De Wynen3.12011
    Diwa v. Kampstüh3.12011
    Dolly v. Lossetal3.12011
    Niklas De Wynen3.12011

    Last updated Wednesday 23 November 2022 20:32 CET



    I have 🍪s