Pedigree Analysis

    Generations

    Coefficients of Kinship, Relationship and Inbreeding 5 Generations - Asta v. Pamesgrub
    This page shows the inbreeding calculations for the dog you selected or the "Test Mating" you have entered. The calculations on this page are accurate to the point that they can only be made based upon the information in the database. For more detailed calculations please make sure that as many ancestors as possible are entered to the database.

    COI Calculation - Asta v. Pamesgrub
    COI 5 gen: 0.391%    too low to be reliabe    Calculate COI again

    Please do the new calculation only if you have entered new ancestors of this dog!


    COI Calculation - Sire Cord v. Wasserplatz and Dam Bessy v. Ahnherrn
    Sire: COI 5 gen: 0.000%    too low to be reliabe    Calculate COI again

    Dam: COI 5 gen: 0.195%    too low to be reliabe    Calculate COI again

    Ancestor-Loss coefficient (ALC)
    This method doesn't replace the calculation of the COI but also gives important information for the breeder. Ancestor-Loss is given when the same ancestor appears more than once in the pedigree of the dog. A 5-generations-pedigree shows 62 possible ancestors. If one of this 62 possible ancestors appears twice, the dog in question has indeed only 61 different ancestors. If 3 ancestors appear twice, this dog has indeed only 59 different ancestors. The ALC is calculated out of the nr. of the ancestors and the total nr. of possible ancestors.

    # of dogs
    Ancestors in 5 Generations (max. 62)59
    Ancestor Loss3
    Ancestor Loss in %95.16 %

    Contributing Ancestors
    AncestorBlood %# of appearances12345
    Cord v. Wasserplatz50.00011
    Bessy v. Ahnherrn50.00011
    Bella v. Peigarten25.00011
    Kent v. Poppenforst25.00011
    Arko v. Kammerforst25.00011
    Gina v. Poppenforst25.00011
    Esta v. Leefeld12.50011
    Nora v. Hahnenkamm12.50011
    Harro v. Lossetal12.50011
    Arco v. Poppenforst12.50011
    Cilla v. Jägerkreuz12.50011
    Natja v. d. Holzheide12.50011
    Benno v. d. Haalquelle12.50011
    Benno v. Pfarrerwald12.50011
    Uhl v. Lönsstein9.36033
    Diana v. Hofried6.25011
    Anja v. Salinenblick6.25011
    Brit z Vrchlabskych Vuk6.25011
    Britta v. Lossetal6.25011
    Niklas De Wynen6.25011
    Puro v. d. Faistenau6.25011
    Conny v. Leefeld6.25011
    Hilda v. d. Hasewiesen6.25011
    Eiko Vun'N Wischhoff6.25011
    Gin v. Reuth6.25011
    Arko v. Abtswald6.25011
    Cäsar v. Bruckhof6.25011
    Anka v. Rehschlag6.25011
    Cindy v. Bärenhorst6.25011
    Cäsar v. d. Zirkelquelle6.25011
    Farah v. Minatal6.25011
    Irrwisch De Wynen3.12011
    Biene v. Ringofen3.12011
    Alf v.d. Goldenen Aue3.12011
    Cita v. d. Donauauen3.12011
    Unda v. Lönsstein3.12011
    Jenny De Wynen3.12011
    Bessy v. Giessbachtal3.12011
    Exy v. Minatal3.12011
    Bussa v. Saaletal3.12011
    Birko v. Holsatia3.12011
    Moritz v. Sämmenhof3.12011
    Carry v. d. Hasewiesen3.12011
    Otti v. Faistenau3.12011
    Asta v. Hofried3.12011
    Flocke v. d. Tränke3.12011
    Arrak v. Hagenpolder3.12011
    Ajda Z Patranske Bazantnice3.12011
    Astor z Kuksu3.12011
    Hella v. d. Moorbrücke3.12011
    Hussa v. Rheinufer3.12011
    Arix Z Akatu3.12011
    Doris v. Reuth3.12011
    Ajax v.d. Puschelburg3.12011
    Axel v. Fichtenhain3.12011
    Groll v. Reutherspfad3.12011
    Tolly v. Kettenluss3.12011
    Esso v. Oberleis3.12011
    Gero v. Sämmenhof3.12011

    Last updated Wednesday 23 November 2022 20:32 CET



    I have 🍪s