Pedigree Analysis

    Generations

    Coefficients of Kinship, Relationship and Inbreeding 5 Generations - Wysiwyg P Ludwig
    This page shows the inbreeding calculations for the dog you selected or the "Test Mating" you have entered. The calculations on this page are accurate to the point that they can only be made based upon the information in the database. For more detailed calculations please make sure that as many ancestors as possible are entered to the database.

    COI Calculation - Wysiwyg P Ludwig
    COI 5 gen: 2.539%    very low    Calculate COI again

    Please do the new calculation only if you have entered new ancestors of this dog!


    COI Calculation - Sire Endo v. Heek and Dam Hexa v. Forst Ostenwalde
    Sire: COI 5 gen: 1.172%    very very low    Calculate COI again

    Dam: COI 5 gen: 1.758%    very very low    Calculate COI again

    Ancestor-Loss coefficient (ALC)
    This method doesn't replace the calculation of the COI but also gives important information for the breeder. Ancestor-Loss is given when the same ancestor appears more than once in the pedigree of the dog. A 5-generations-pedigree shows 62 possible ancestors. If one of this 62 possible ancestors appears twice, the dog in question has indeed only 61 different ancestors. If 3 ancestors appear twice, this dog has indeed only 59 different ancestors. The ALC is calculated out of the nr. of the ancestors and the total nr. of possible ancestors.

    # of dogs
    Ancestors in 5 Generations (max. 62)59
    Ancestor Loss3
    Ancestor Loss in %95.16 %

    Contributing Ancestors
    AncestorBlood %# of appearances12345
    Hexa v. Forst Ostenwalde50.00011
    Endo v. Heek50.00011
    Hera v. Wasserplatz28.120211
    Westfalen's Chef25.00011
    Anka v. Heek25.00011
    Samson v. Linduri25.00011
    Hajo Aus Grupilinga15.620211
    Asta v. Averbeck12.50011
    Laura v. Poppenforst12.50011
    Osca Aus Grupilinga12.50011
    Hesta v. Linduri12.50011
    Elch v. Hanauer Land12.50011
    Kira v. Tillplatz12.50011
    Igor v. Linebrok12.50011
    Jerome De Wynen6.25011
    Elfe v. Linebrok6.25011
    Dax v. Forst Ostenwalde6.25011
    Cliff v. Fränkischen Bauern6.25011
    Aika v. Buchwald6.25011
    Solojäger's Laura6.25011
    Drossel v. d. Grassel6.25011
    Etzel v. Nörderkamp6.25011
    Natja v. d. Holzheide6.25011
    Bodo v. d. Hasenheide6.25011
    Archibald v. d. Segeberger Heide6.25011
    Dana v. Tillplatz6.25011
    Tinka v. d. Bilsbek6.25011
    Gitta v. d. Wallburg6.25011
    Basko v. Bucheneck6.25011
    Arco v. Backemeer6.25011
    Graf v. Silbersee6.24022
    Astor v. d. Weide3.12011
    Cliff v. Linduri3.12011
    Cim v. Wuddelhoff3.12011
    Cindy v. Bärenhorst3.12011
    Nadja De Wynen3.12011
    Asra v. Eulenhof3.12011
    Anka v. Schönrain3.12011
    Hella v. Nörderkamp3.12011
    Ria v. d. Böckelsburg3.12011
    Niklas De Wynen3.12011
    Jakob v. Sämmenhof3.12011
    Britta v. Hasselbach3.12011
    Bautz v. d. Leda3.12011
    Fee v. d. Kiefhornsmühle3.12011
    Gordon v. d. Hafkesdell3.12011
    Olga v. Bärenhorst3.12011
    Chico v. Borgkamp3.12011
    Solojäger's Harras3.12011
    Bella v. Tillplatz3.12011
    Cora v. Holmesborn3.12011
    Hakon v. Forstgarten3.12011
    Olga v. d. Drachheide3.12011
    Yalk De Wynen3.12011
    Artus v. d. Hasewiesen3.12011
    Alf v. Wachtelrangen3.12011
    Anke v. Keenmoor3.12011
    Alice v. Wiebusch3.12011
    Benno v. Pfarrerwald3.12011

    Last updated Wednesday 23 November 2022 20:32 CET



    I have 🍪s