Pedigree Analysis

    Generations

    Coefficients of Kinship, Relationship and Inbreeding 5 Generations - Riko v. Wasserplatz
    This page shows the inbreeding calculations for the dog you selected or the "Test Mating" you have entered. The calculations on this page are accurate to the point that they can only be made based upon the information in the database. For more detailed calculations please make sure that as many ancestors as possible are entered to the database.

    COI Calculation - Riko v. Wasserplatz
    COI 5 gen: 0.000%    too low to be reliabe    Calculate COI again

    Please do the new calculation only if you have entered new ancestors of this dog!


    COI Calculation - Sire Castor v. Bakumer Esch and Dam Kascha v. Wasserplatz
    Sire: COI 5 gen: 1.758%    very very low    Calculate COI again

    Dam: COI 5 gen: 0.879%    too low to be reliabe    Calculate COI again

    Ancestor-Loss coefficient (ALC)
    This method doesn't replace the calculation of the COI but also gives important information for the breeder. Ancestor-Loss is given when the same ancestor appears more than once in the pedigree of the dog. A 5-generations-pedigree shows 62 possible ancestors. If one of this 62 possible ancestors appears twice, the dog in question has indeed only 61 different ancestors. If 3 ancestors appear twice, this dog has indeed only 59 different ancestors. The ALC is calculated out of the nr. of the ancestors and the total nr. of possible ancestors.

    # of dogs
    Ancestors in 5 Generations (max. 62)60
    Ancestor Loss2
    Ancestor Loss in %96.77 %

    Contributing Ancestors
    AncestorBlood %# of appearances12345
    Castor v. Bakumer Esch50.00011
    Kascha v. Wasserplatz50.00011
    Mira v. Linduri25.00011
    Hajo Aus Grupilinga25.00011
    Lukas v. Linduri25.00011
    Laura v. Poppenforst25.00011
    Natja v. d. Holzheide12.50011
    Jerome De Wynen12.50011
    Olly v. Bärenhorst12.50011
    Hesta v. Linduri12.50011
    Amsel v. Silbergrund12.50011
    Tinka v. d. Bilsbek12.50011
    Basko v. Bucheneck12.50011
    Bautz v. d. Leda12.50011
    Derry v. Erlesberg6.25011
    Cindy v. Bärenhorst6.25011
    Graf v. Silbersee6.25011
    Cora v. Schäferbusch6.25011
    Nadja De Wynen6.25011
    Chico v. Borgkamp6.25011
    Niklas De Wynen6.25011
    Yalk De Wynen6.25011
    Drossel v. d. Grassel6.25011
    Fee v. d. Kiefhornsmühle6.25011
    Paris v. d. Waterkant6.25011
    Gitta v. Lossetal6.25011
    Asta v. Bartelskamp6.25011
    Alf v. Wachtelrangen6.25011
    Etzel v. Nörderkamp6.25011
    Asra v. Eulenhof6.25011
    Irrwisch De Wynen6.24022
    Jenny De Wynen6.24022
    Unda v. Lönsstein3.12011
    Britta v. Bärenhorst3.12011
    Gero v. Wiken3.12011
    Anka v. Kappelbuck3.12011
    Boss Holsatia3.12011
    Flocke v. d. Tränke3.12011
    Ria v. d. Böckelsburg3.12011
    Dolly v. Lossetal3.12011
    Hesto v. Werlacke3.12011
    Ines v. d. Waterkant3.12011
    Britta v. Hasselbach3.12011
    Rachel De Wynen3.12011
    Edda v. Haselbusch3.12011
    Pitt v. d. Bärenburg3.12011
    Xari v. Wolfsgrund3.12011
    Gustel v. d. Kiefhornsmühle3.12011
    Locke Frankundfrei3.12011
    Boss v. Silbersee3.12011
    Artus v. d. Hasewiesen3.12011
    Groll v. Reutherspfad3.12011
    Anka v. Jagenberg3.12011
    Eyko v. Arlsberg3.12011
    Hella v. d. Lindenhöhe3.12011
    Uhl v. Lönsstein3.12011
    Astor v. d. Weide3.12011
    Elvi v. Lossetal3.12011
    Maestro De Wynen3.12011
    Faro v. d. Falkenweiden3.12011

    Last updated Wednesday 23 November 2022 20:32 CET



    I have 🍪s