Pedigree Analysis

    Generations

    Coefficients of Kinship, Relationship and Inbreeding 5 Generations - Westfalen's Birka
    This page shows the inbreeding calculations for the dog you selected or the "Test Mating" you have entered. The calculations on this page are accurate to the point that they can only be made based upon the information in the database. For more detailed calculations please make sure that as many ancestors as possible are entered to the database.

    COI Calculation - Westfalen's Birka
    COI 5 gen: 0.000%    too low to be reliabe    Calculate COI again

    Please do the new calculation only if you have entered new ancestors of this dog!


    COI Calculation - Sire Gauner v. Stockey and Dam Kira v. Tillplatz
    Sire: COI 5 gen: 0.000%    too low to be reliabe    Calculate COI again

    Dam: COI 5 gen: 0.586%    too low to be reliabe    Calculate COI again

    Ancestor-Loss coefficient (ALC)
    This method doesn't replace the calculation of the COI but also gives important information for the breeder. Ancestor-Loss is given when the same ancestor appears more than once in the pedigree of the dog. A 5-generations-pedigree shows 62 possible ancestors. If one of this 62 possible ancestors appears twice, the dog in question has indeed only 61 different ancestors. If 3 ancestors appear twice, this dog has indeed only 59 different ancestors. The ALC is calculated out of the nr. of the ancestors and the total nr. of possible ancestors.

    # of dogs
    Ancestors in 5 Generations (max. 62)62
    Ancestor Loss0
    Ancestor Loss in %100.00 %

    Contributing Ancestors
    AncestorBlood %# of appearances12345
    Kira v. Tillplatz50.00011
    Gauner v. Stockey50.00011
    Alex v. Bannwald25.00011
    Evita v. Stockey25.00011
    Dana v. Tillplatz25.00011
    Arco v. Backemeer25.00011
    Hakon v. Forstgarten12.50011
    Asco Westerode12.50011
    Anke v. Keenmoor12.50011
    Chica v. d. Hafkesdell12.50011
    Solojäger's Harras12.50011
    Branca v. d. Biberquelle12.50011
    Bella v. Tillplatz12.50011
    Graf v. Silbersee12.50011
    Amber De Wynen6.25011
    Dina v. Forstgarten6.25011
    Anka v. Birkenhaus6.25011
    Nimrod's Birko6.25011
    Etzel v. Nörderkamp6.25011
    Alf v. Siegbogen6.25011
    Ara v. Tillplatz6.25011
    Dolly v. Lossetal6.25011
    Solojäger's Distel6.25011
    Dina Chamavia6.25011
    Becas v. Lönsstein6.25011
    Afra v. d. Bohlsener Mühle6.25011
    Cent v. Hasselbach6.25011
    Zick v. Sämmenhof6.25011
    Boss v. Silbersee6.25011
    Boss Holsatia6.25011
    Orlo v. d. Overbecker Mühle3.12011
    Britta v. Lossetal3.12011
    Priska De Wynen3.12011
    Cliff v. Linduri3.12011
    Ino v. Kreyenhorst3.12011
    Diwa v. Kampstüh3.12011
    Bautz v. Mönchsbrunnen3.12011
    Vroni v. Sämmenhof3.12011
    Citta v. Langen Siek3.12011
    Pascha v. d. Binnenelbe3.12011
    Harro v. Lossetal3.12011
    Ass v. d. Schlei3.12011
    Janka v. d. Waterkant3.12011
    Esko Vun'N Wischhoff3.12011
    Josi v. Königsfeld3.12011
    Artus v. d. Hasewiesen3.12011
    Freya v. Steinroden3.12011
    Cora v. Bärenhorst3.12011
    Baldur v. Lönsstein3.12011
    Manto v. d. Düsterbeck3.12011
    Dina v. Steinroden3.12011
    Groll v. Reutherspfad3.12011
    Alf v. Rauhen Ebrach Tal3.12011
    Edda v. Jurawald3.12011
    Cita v. Winterberg3.12011
    Carmen v. d. Nordmannstannen3.12011
    Erko v. Jahnplatz3.12011
    Cent v. Hofried3.12011
    Ria v. d. Böckelsburg3.12011
    Lyra v. d. Königseiche3.12011
    Uta Chamavia3.12011
    Hektor v. d. Lindenhöhe3.12011

    Last updated Wednesday 23 November 2022 20:32 CET



    I have 🍪s