Pedigree Analysis

    Generations

    Coefficients of Kinship, Relationship and Inbreeding 5 Generations - Asta v. Averbeck
    This page shows the inbreeding calculations for the dog you selected or the "Test Mating" you have entered. The calculations on this page are accurate to the point that they can only be made based upon the information in the database. For more detailed calculations please make sure that as many ancestors as possible are entered to the database.

    COI Calculation - Asta v. Averbeck
    COI 5 gen: 0.000%    too low to be reliabe    Calculate COI again

    Please do the new calculation only if you have entered new ancestors of this dog!


    COI Calculation - Sire Cliff v. Fränkischen Bauern and Dam Gitta v. d. Wallburg
    Sire: COI 5 gen: 0.586%    too low to be reliabe    Calculate COI again

    Dam: COI 5 gen: 0.781%    too low to be reliabe    Calculate COI again

    Ancestor-Loss coefficient (ALC)
    This method doesn't replace the calculation of the COI but also gives important information for the breeder. Ancestor-Loss is given when the same ancestor appears more than once in the pedigree of the dog. A 5-generations-pedigree shows 62 possible ancestors. If one of this 62 possible ancestors appears twice, the dog in question has indeed only 61 different ancestors. If 3 ancestors appear twice, this dog has indeed only 59 different ancestors. The ALC is calculated out of the nr. of the ancestors and the total nr. of possible ancestors.

    # of dogs
    Ancestors in 5 Generations (max. 62)60
    Ancestor Loss2
    Ancestor Loss in %96.77 %

    Contributing Ancestors
    AncestorBlood %# of appearances12345
    Cliff v. Fränkischen Bauern50.00011
    Gitta v. d. Wallburg50.00011
    Jakob v. Sämmenhof25.00011
    Gordon v. d. Hafkesdell25.00011
    Alice v. Wiebusch25.00011
    Anka v. Schönrain25.00011
    Cora v. d. Hafkesdell12.50011
    Bobby v. d. Hasenheide12.50011
    Filou v. Alten Hafen12.50011
    Bodo v. d. Kummel12.50011
    Dixie v. Falkenhorst12.50011
    Zick v. Sämmenhof12.50011
    Lara v. Werlacke12.50011
    Cora v. d. Pfauheck12.50011
    Cent v. Hofried6.25011
    Cliff v. Linduri6.25011
    Asta v. Werlacke6.25011
    Olga v. Bärenhorst6.25011
    Bonny v. Jägerkreuz6.25011
    Alf v. Siegbogen6.25011
    Gambo v. Werlacke6.25011
    Asta v. Mönchsbrunnen6.25011
    Dina Chamavia6.25011
    Arko v. Kammerforst6.25011
    Dandy v. Roonstein6.25011
    Graf v. Silbersee6.25011
    Hektor v. d. Lindenhöhe6.25011
    Asja v. Alten Hafen6.25011
    Vroni v. Sämmenhof6.25011
    Cindy v. Tenntal6.25011
    Harro v. Lossetal6.24022
    Asta v. Steinleite6.24022
    Erko v. Jahnplatz3.12011
    Dolly v. Lossetal3.12011
    Nora v. d. Bärenburg3.12011
    Uta Chamavia3.12011
    Gero v. Sämmenhof3.12011
    Anja v. Salinenblick3.12011
    Josi v. Königsfeld3.12011
    Boss v. Silbersee3.12011
    Bill v. Bessingslust3.12011
    Fasko v. Reutherspfad3.12011
    Eiko v. Weithof3.12011
    Paris v. d. Waterkant3.12011
    Chico v. Borgkamp3.12011
    Asta v. Bartelskamp3.12011
    Hella v. Sämmenhof3.12011
    Uhl v. Lönsstein3.12011
    Bine v. Sünnekenbusch3.12011
    Vella v. Fährhaus3.12011
    Bobby v. Leefeld3.12011
    Anka v. d. Zirkelquelle3.12011
    Condor v. d. Jägerhalle3.12011
    Drossel v. d. Grassel3.12011
    Alf v. Schinterkogel3.12011
    Arko v. Abtswald3.12011
    Nora v. Hahnenkamm3.12011
    Asta v. Hofried3.12011
    Grandel v. d. Lindenhöhe3.12011
    Etzel v. Nörderkamp3.12011

    Last updated Wednesday 23 November 2022 20:32 CET



    I have 🍪s