Pedigree Analysis

    Generations

    Coefficients of Kinship, Relationship and Inbreeding 5 Generations - Arras v. Eschbach
    This page shows the inbreeding calculations for the dog you selected or the "Test Mating" you have entered. The calculations on this page are accurate to the point that they can only be made based upon the information in the database. For more detailed calculations please make sure that as many ancestors as possible are entered to the database.

    COI Calculation - Arras v. Eschbach
    COI 5 gen: 0.195%    too low to be reliabe    Calculate COI again

    Please do the new calculation only if you have entered new ancestors of this dog!


    COI Calculation - Sire Arras v. Eikenloh and Dam Gina v. Roonstein
    Sire: COI 5 gen: 0.391%    too low to be reliabe    Calculate COI again

    Dam: COI 5 gen: 0.195%    too low to be reliabe    Calculate COI again

    Ancestor-Loss coefficient (ALC)
    This method doesn't replace the calculation of the COI but also gives important information for the breeder. Ancestor-Loss is given when the same ancestor appears more than once in the pedigree of the dog. A 5-generations-pedigree shows 62 possible ancestors. If one of this 62 possible ancestors appears twice, the dog in question has indeed only 61 different ancestors. If 3 ancestors appear twice, this dog has indeed only 59 different ancestors. The ALC is calculated out of the nr. of the ancestors and the total nr. of possible ancestors.

    # of dogs
    Ancestors in 5 Generations (max. 62)58
    Ancestor Loss4
    Ancestor Loss in %93.55 %

    Contributing Ancestors
    AncestorBlood %# of appearances12345
    Gina v. Roonstein50.00011
    Arras v. Eikenloh50.00011
    Cäsar v. Elsternkamp25.00011
    Lukas v. Linduri25.00011
    Lucie Nelha25.00011
    Freya v. Roonstein25.00011
    Biene v. Siegbogen12.50011
    Eiko v. Weithof12.50022
    Alo v. Burgstall12.50011
    Solojäger's Granne12.50011
    Hesta v. Linduri12.50011
    Olly v. Bärenhorst12.50011
    Jenny v. Huckberg12.50011
    Joe v. Fasanenhof12.50011
    Dandy v. Roonstein12.50011
    Solojäger's Distel6.25011
    Josi v. Königsfeld6.25011
    Becas v. Lönsstein6.25011
    Bine v. Sünnekenbusch6.25011
    Hasso v. Langen Siek6.25011
    Ilse v. Fasanenhof6.25011
    Benno v. d. Haalquelle6.25011
    Drossel v. d. Grassel6.25011
    Britta v. d. Schwarzen Brücke6.25011
    Asta v. Bartelskamp6.25011
    Onko v. Tecklenburg6.25011
    Paris v. d. Waterkant6.25011
    Etzel v. Nörderkamp6.25011
    Solojäger's Anka6.25011
    Lord v. Schadwalde6.24022
    Edda v. Jurawald6.24022
    Laila v. d. Overbecker Mühle6.24022
    Artus v. d. Hasewiesen3.12011
    Dunja v. d. Krausen Eiche3.12011
    Ria v. d. Böckelsburg3.12011
    Iris v. Huckberg3.12011
    Amsel v. Fredenhof3.12011
    Dux v. Silbersee3.12011
    Britta v. Hasselbach3.12011
    Gero v. Wiken3.12011
    Cita v. Winterberg3.12011
    Cäsar v. d. Zirkelquelle3.12011
    Astor v. d. Weide3.12011
    Graf v. Silbersee3.12011
    Boss Holsatia3.12011
    Hilda v. d. Hasewiesen3.12011
    Hektor v. d. Lindenhöhe3.12011
    Lord v. Reinufer3.12011
    Britta v. Bärenhorst3.12011
    Enno v. Forstgarten3.12011
    Cäsar v. d. Hohen Geest3.12011
    Ines v. d. Waterkant3.12011
    Bautz v. Mönchsbrunnen3.12011
    Dax v. d. Aue3.12011
    Babsy v. Weberhof3.12011
    Cäsar v. Bruckhof3.12011
    Yra v. d. Holzheide3.12011
    Anett v. Fasanenhof3.12011

    Last updated Wednesday 23 November 2022 20:32 CET



    I have 🍪s