Pedigree Analysis

    Generations

    Coefficients of Kinship, Relationship and Inbreeding 5 Generations - Gitta v. d. Wallburg
    This page shows the inbreeding calculations for the dog you selected or the "Test Mating" you have entered. The calculations on this page are accurate to the point that they can only be made based upon the information in the database. For more detailed calculations please make sure that as many ancestors as possible are entered to the database.

    COI Calculation - Gitta v. d. Wallburg
    COI 5 gen: 0.781%    too low to be reliabe    Calculate COI again

    Please do the new calculation only if you have entered new ancestors of this dog!


    COI Calculation - Sire Gordon v. d. Hafkesdell and Dam Alice v. Wiebusch
    Sire: COI 5 gen: 0.000%    too low to be reliabe    Calculate COI again

    Dam: COI 5 gen: 0.977%    too low to be reliabe    Calculate COI again

    Ancestor-Loss coefficient (ALC)
    This method doesn't replace the calculation of the COI but also gives important information for the breeder. Ancestor-Loss is given when the same ancestor appears more than once in the pedigree of the dog. A 5-generations-pedigree shows 62 possible ancestors. If one of this 62 possible ancestors appears twice, the dog in question has indeed only 61 different ancestors. If 3 ancestors appear twice, this dog has indeed only 59 different ancestors. The ALC is calculated out of the nr. of the ancestors and the total nr. of possible ancestors.

    # of dogs
    Ancestors in 5 Generations (max. 62)59
    Ancestor Loss3
    Ancestor Loss in %95.16 %

    Contributing Ancestors
    AncestorBlood %# of appearances12345
    Gordon v. d. Hafkesdell50.00011
    Alice v. Wiebusch50.00011
    Cora v. d. Pfauheck25.00011
    Cora v. d. Hafkesdell25.00011
    Bobby v. d. Hasenheide25.00011
    Filou v. Alten Hafen25.00011
    Harro v. Lossetal12.50022
    Dandy v. Roonstein12.50011
    Olga v. Bärenhorst12.50011
    Bonny v. Jägerkreuz12.50011
    Asja v. Alten Hafen12.50011
    Dina Chamavia12.50011
    Cliff v. Linduri12.50011
    Alf v. Siegbogen12.50011
    Arko v. Kammerforst12.50011
    Arko v. Abtswald6.25011
    Erko v. Jahnplatz6.25011
    Asta v. Bartelskamp6.25011
    Josi v. Königsfeld6.25011
    Uta Chamavia6.25011
    Paris v. d. Waterkant6.25011
    Chico v. Borgkamp6.25011
    Vella v. Fährhaus6.25011
    Anja v. Salinenblick6.25011
    Bine v. Sünnekenbusch6.25011
    Drossel v. d. Grassel6.25011
    Eiko v. Weithof6.25011
    Nora v. Hahnenkamm6.25011
    Etzel v. Nörderkamp6.25011
    Eiko Vun'N Wischhoff6.24022
    Britta v. Lossetal6.24022
    Freya v. Sämmenhof3.12011
    Lord v. Schadwalde3.12011
    Ova v. Fährhaus3.12011
    Elvi v. Lossetal3.12011
    Wido v. Schwege3.12011
    Laila v. d. Overbecker Mühle3.12011
    Ines v. d. Waterkant3.12011
    Astor v. d. Weide3.12011
    Jenny v. Römersee3.12011
    Hussa v. Rheinufer3.12011
    Dunja v. d. Krausen Eiche3.12011
    Britta v. Bärenhorst3.12011
    Cäsar v. d. Hohen Geest3.12011
    Cäsar v. d. Zirkelquelle3.12011
    Babsy v. Weberhof3.12011
    Uhl v. Lönsstein3.12011
    Diana v. Hofried3.12011
    Ria v. d. Böckelsburg3.12011
    Gero v. Wiken3.12011
    Bussa v. Saaletal3.12011
    King v. Fährhaus3.12011
    Artus v. d. Hasewiesen3.12011
    Boss Holsatia3.12011
    Britta v. Hasselbach3.12011
    Axel v. Fichtenhain3.12011
    Astor v. Hofried3.12011
    Lord v. Reinufer3.12011
    Xari v. Wolfsgrund3.12011

    Last updated Wednesday 23 November 2022 20:32 CET



    I have 🍪s