Pedigree Analysis

    Generations

    Coefficients of Kinship, Relationship and Inbreeding 5 Generations - Odett v. Hülsebusch
    This page shows the inbreeding calculations for the dog you selected or the "Test Mating" you have entered. The calculations on this page are accurate to the point that they can only be made based upon the information in the database. For more detailed calculations please make sure that as many ancestors as possible are entered to the database.

    COI Calculation - Odett v. Hülsebusch
    COI 5 gen: 0.000%    too low to be reliabe    Calculate COI again

    Please do the new calculation only if you have entered new ancestors of this dog!


    COI Calculation - Sire Orka v. d. Drachheide and Dam Peggy v. d. Holzheide
    Sire: COI 5 gen: 0.000%    too low to be reliabe    Calculate COI again

    Dam: COI 5 gen: 4.688%    very low    Calculate COI again

    Ancestor-Loss coefficient (ALC)
    This method doesn't replace the calculation of the COI but also gives important information for the breeder. Ancestor-Loss is given when the same ancestor appears more than once in the pedigree of the dog. A 5-generations-pedigree shows 62 possible ancestors. If one of this 62 possible ancestors appears twice, the dog in question has indeed only 61 different ancestors. If 3 ancestors appear twice, this dog has indeed only 59 different ancestors. The ALC is calculated out of the nr. of the ancestors and the total nr. of possible ancestors.

    # of dogs
    Ancestors in 5 Generations (max. 62)60
    Ancestor Loss2
    Ancestor Loss in %96.77 %

    Contributing Ancestors
    AncestorBlood %# of appearances12345
    Peggy v. d. Holzheide50.00011
    Orka v. d. Drachheide50.00011
    Yalk De Wynen25.00011
    Elsa v. Burghöft25.00011
    Nixe v. d. Holzheide25.00011
    Hajo Aus Grupilinga25.00011
    Nimrod's Birko12.50011
    Cindy v. Bärenhorst12.50011
    Hesto v. Werlacke12.50011
    Rachel De Wynen12.50011
    Tinka v. d. Bilsbek12.50011
    Basko v. Bucheneck12.50011
    Niklas De Wynen12.50011
    Iva v. d. Drachheide12.50011
    Xandra v. Lönsstein9.370211
    Asta v. Werlacke9.370211
    Jenny De Wynen6.25011
    Unda v. Lönsstein6.25011
    Chico v. Borgkamp6.25011
    Larry v. Ringofen6.25011
    Alf v. Wachtelrangen6.25011
    Groll v. Reutherspfad6.25011
    Aspe v. Bondenholz6.25011
    Lyra v. d. Königseiche6.25011
    Fee v. d. Kiefhornsmühle6.25011
    Cliff v. Linduri6.25011
    Bobby v. Leefeld6.25011
    Cai Holsatia6.25011
    Asra v. Eulenhof6.25011
    Irrwisch De Wynen6.25011
    Heidi v. Lönsstein3.12011
    Arrak v. Hagenpolder3.12011
    Gundi v. d. Königseiche3.12011
    Anka v. Kappelbuck3.12011
    Gambo v. Werlacke3.12011
    Bessy v. Giessbachtal3.12011
    Daisy v. Ringofen3.12011
    Chica v. d. Drachheide3.12011
    Mary v. Lönsstein3.12011
    Utz v. Lönsstein3.12011
    Hanko v. Sämmenhof3.12011
    Pitt v. d. Bärenburg3.12011
    Xari v. Wolfsgrund3.12011
    Maestro De Wynen3.12011
    Edda v. Haselbusch3.12011
    Boro v. Silbersee3.12011
    Jette v. d. Bilsbek3.12011
    Quell v. d. Binnenelbe3.12011
    Drossel v. d. Grassel3.12011
    Arco v. Reutherspfad3.12011
    Alf v. Schinterkogel3.12011
    Elvi v. Lossetal3.12011
    Etzel v. Nörderkamp3.12011
    Asta v. Steinleite3.12011
    Dolf v. Lönsstein3.12011
    Anka v. Jagenberg3.12011
    Eyko v. Arlsberg3.12011
    Harro v. Lossetal3.12011
    Hazel De Wynen3.12011
    Ex v. Oberleis3.12011

    Last updated Wednesday 23 November 2022 20:32 CET



    I have 🍪s