Pedigree Analysis

    Generations

    Coefficients of Kinship, Relationship and Inbreeding 5 Generations - Arras v. Eikenloh
    This page shows the inbreeding calculations for the dog you selected or the "Test Mating" you have entered. The calculations on this page are accurate to the point that they can only be made based upon the information in the database. For more detailed calculations please make sure that as many ancestors as possible are entered to the database.

    COI Calculation - Arras v. Eikenloh
    COI 5 gen: 0.391%    too low to be reliabe    Calculate COI again

    Please do the new calculation only if you have entered new ancestors of this dog!


    COI Calculation - Sire Lukas v. Linduri and Dam Lucie Nelha
    Sire: COI 5 gen: 0.000%    too low to be reliabe    Calculate COI again

    Dam: COI 5 gen: 0.586%    too low to be reliabe    Calculate COI again

    Ancestor-Loss coefficient (ALC)
    This method doesn't replace the calculation of the COI but also gives important information for the breeder. Ancestor-Loss is given when the same ancestor appears more than once in the pedigree of the dog. A 5-generations-pedigree shows 62 possible ancestors. If one of this 62 possible ancestors appears twice, the dog in question has indeed only 61 different ancestors. If 3 ancestors appear twice, this dog has indeed only 59 different ancestors. The ALC is calculated out of the nr. of the ancestors and the total nr. of possible ancestors.

    # of dogs
    Ancestors in 5 Generations (max. 62)61
    Ancestor Loss1
    Ancestor Loss in %98.39 %

    Contributing Ancestors
    AncestorBlood %# of appearances12345
    Lukas v. Linduri50.00011
    Lucie Nelha50.00011
    Solojäger's Granne25.00011
    Olly v. Bärenhorst25.00011
    Hesta v. Linduri25.00011
    Joe v. Fasanenhof25.00011
    Drossel v. d. Grassel12.50011
    Ilse v. Fasanenhof12.50011
    Etzel v. Nörderkamp12.50011
    Asta v. Bartelskamp12.50011
    Paris v. d. Waterkant12.50011
    Onko v. Tecklenburg12.50011
    Solojäger's Distel12.50011
    Becas v. Lönsstein12.50011
    Artus v. d. Hasewiesen9.370211
    Boss Holsatia6.25011
    Amsel v. Fredenhof6.25011
    Hektor v. d. Lindenhöhe6.25011
    Astor v. d. Weide6.25011
    Britta v. Bärenhorst6.25011
    Cita v. Winterberg6.25011
    Bautz v. Mönchsbrunnen6.25011
    Anett v. Fasanenhof6.25011
    Ines v. d. Waterkant6.25011
    Edda v. Jurawald6.25011
    Dax v. d. Aue6.25011
    Ria v. d. Böckelsburg6.25011
    Gero v. Wiken6.25011
    Britta v. Hasselbach6.25011
    Graf v. Silbersee6.25011
    Ingo v. Schadwalde3.12011
    Boss v. Silbersee3.12011
    Bill v. Bessingslust3.12011
    Anja v. Taubertal3.12011
    Birko v. Holsatia3.12011
    Dolly v. Lossetal3.12011
    Edu v. Forstgarten3.12011
    Ajax v. Klockhof3.12011
    Lasko v. Holmesborn3.12011
    Dina v. Steinroden3.12011
    Erle v. Steinroden3.12011
    Enno Holsatia3.12011
    Delta v. Langen Siek3.12011
    Moritz v. Sämmenhof3.12011
    Diwa v. Kampstüh3.12011
    Anka v. d. Zirkelquelle3.12011
    Ute v. Lönsstein3.12011
    Pascha v. d. Binnenelbe3.12011
    Janka v. Tecklenburg3.12011
    Afra v. Seggehorn3.12011
    Esko Vun'N Wischhoff3.12011
    Cilly v. Waterkant3.12011
    Cora v. Tannenkamp3.12011
    Unda v. Lönsstein3.12011
    Grandel v. d. Lindenhöhe3.12011
    Olli v. d. Böckelsburg3.12011
    Golo Dankwarder Ode3.12011
    Rasso v. Lönsstein3.12011
    Utz v. Lönsstein3.12011
    Bella v. d. Aue3.12011
    Manto v. d. Düsterbeck3.12011

    Last updated Wednesday 23 November 2022 20:32 CET



    I have 🍪s