Pedigree Analysis

    Generations

    Coefficients of Kinship, Relationship and Inbreeding 5 Generations - Aik v. Hahnentange
    This page shows the inbreeding calculations for the dog you selected or the "Test Mating" you have entered. The calculations on this page are accurate to the point that they can only be made based upon the information in the database. For more detailed calculations please make sure that as many ancestors as possible are entered to the database.

    COI Calculation - Aik v. Hahnentange
    COI 5 gen: 1.172%    very very low    Calculate COI again

    Please do the new calculation only if you have entered new ancestors of this dog!


    COI Calculation - Sire Eddy v. d. Pfauheck and Dam Orka v. Linduri
    Sire: COI 5 gen: 0.391%    too low to be reliabe    Calculate COI again

    Dam: COI 5 gen: 0.000%    too low to be reliabe    Calculate COI again

    Ancestor-Loss coefficient (ALC)
    This method doesn't replace the calculation of the COI but also gives important information for the breeder. Ancestor-Loss is given when the same ancestor appears more than once in the pedigree of the dog. A 5-generations-pedigree shows 62 possible ancestors. If one of this 62 possible ancestors appears twice, the dog in question has indeed only 61 different ancestors. If 3 ancestors appear twice, this dog has indeed only 59 different ancestors. The ALC is calculated out of the nr. of the ancestors and the total nr. of possible ancestors.

    # of dogs
    Ancestors in 5 Generations (max. 62)58
    Ancestor Loss4
    Ancestor Loss in %93.55 %

    Contributing Ancestors
    AncestorBlood %# of appearances12345
    Eddy v. d. Pfauheck50.00011
    Orka v. Linduri50.00011
    Amsel v. Silbergrund25.00011
    Bautz v. d. Leda25.00011
    Bodo v. Steyerberg25.00011
    Aika v. d. Pfauheck25.00011
    Bonny v. Jägerkreuz12.50011
    Cora v. Schäferbusch12.50011
    Boss v. Silbersee12.50022
    Graf v. Silbersee12.50011
    Ossy De Wynen12.50011
    Derry v. Erlesberg12.50011
    Troll v. Rheinufer12.50011
    Gitta v. Lossetal12.50011
    Hecht v. d. Königseiche12.50011
    Uhl v. Lönsstein9.370211
    Hella v. d. Lindenhöhe6.25011
    Faro v. d. Falkenweiden6.25011
    Rig Chamavia6.25011
    Dolly v. Lossetal6.25011
    Flocke v. d. Tränke6.25011
    Anja v. Salinenblick6.25011
    Gustel v. d. Kiefhornsmühle6.25011
    Arko v. Abtswald6.25011
    Locke Frankundfrei6.25011
    Gilla v. Reinufer6.25011
    Alf v. Geierling6.25011
    Gundi v. d. Königseiche6.25011
    Itta De Wynen6.25011
    Ino v. Kreyenhorst6.24022
    Citta v. Langen Siek6.24022
    Etzel v. Sämmenhof3.12011
    Okai v. d. Holzheide3.12011
    Utz v. Lönsstein3.12011
    Cilli v. Grünen Wege3.12011
    Axel v. Fichtenhain3.12011
    Anke v. d. Igelsheide3.12011
    Dona v. Jägerhalle3.12011
    Natter v. Lönsstein3.12011
    Bianka v. d. Königseiche3.12011
    Astor v. Hofried3.12011
    Britta v. Lossetal3.12011
    Alf v. Wachtelrangen3.12011
    Milla v. Feuersang3.12011
    Bill v. Bessingslust3.12011
    Grandel v. d. Lindenhöhe3.12011
    Gero Frankundfrei3.12011
    Xandra v. Lönsstein3.12011
    Cita v. d. Tränke3.12011
    Jenny v. Römersee3.12011
    Hussa v. Rheinufer3.12011
    Bodo v. Weserstrand3.12011
    Cäsar v. d. Hohen Geest3.12011
    Berry v. Nordpark3.12011
    Groll v. Reutherspfad3.12011
    Cent Graf v. Amelsbüren3.12011
    Bussa v. Saaletal3.12011
    Cindy v. d. Kiefhornsmühle3.12011

    Last updated Wednesday 23 November 2022 20:32 CET



    I have 🍪s