Pedigree Analysis

    Generations

    Coefficients of Kinship, Relationship and Inbreeding 5 Generations - Castor v. Bakumer Esch
    This page shows the inbreeding calculations for the dog you selected or the "Test Mating" you have entered. The calculations on this page are accurate to the point that they can only be made based upon the information in the database. For more detailed calculations please make sure that as many ancestors as possible are entered to the database.

    COI Calculation - Castor v. Bakumer Esch
    COI 5 gen: 1.758%    very very low    Calculate COI again

    Please do the new calculation only if you have entered new ancestors of this dog!


    COI Calculation - Sire Hajo Aus Grupilinga and Dam Mira v. Linduri
    Sire: COI 5 gen: 0.000%    too low to be reliabe    Calculate COI again

    Dam: COI 5 gen: 0.000%    too low to be reliabe    Calculate COI again

    Ancestor-Loss coefficient (ALC)
    This method doesn't replace the calculation of the COI but also gives important information for the breeder. Ancestor-Loss is given when the same ancestor appears more than once in the pedigree of the dog. A 5-generations-pedigree shows 62 possible ancestors. If one of this 62 possible ancestors appears twice, the dog in question has indeed only 61 different ancestors. If 3 ancestors appear twice, this dog has indeed only 59 different ancestors. The ALC is calculated out of the nr. of the ancestors and the total nr. of possible ancestors.

    # of dogs
    Ancestors in 5 Generations (max. 62)58
    Ancestor Loss4
    Ancestor Loss in %93.55 %

    Contributing Ancestors
    AncestorBlood %# of appearances12345
    Hajo Aus Grupilinga50.00011
    Mira v. Linduri50.00011
    Tinka v. d. Bilsbek25.00011
    Basko v. Bucheneck25.00011
    Bautz v. d. Leda25.00011
    Amsel v. Silbergrund25.00011
    Alf v. Wachtelrangen15.620211
    Cora v. Schäferbusch12.50011
    Chico v. Borgkamp12.50011
    Graf v. Silbersee12.50011
    Asra v. Eulenhof12.50011
    Fee v. d. Kiefhornsmühle12.50011
    Gitta v. Lossetal12.50011
    Derry v. Erlesberg12.50011
    Flocke v. d. Tränke9.370211
    Uhl v. Lönsstein9.370211
    Dolly v. Lossetal6.25011
    Edda v. Haselbusch6.25011
    Gustel v. d. Kiefhornsmühle6.25011
    Pitt v. d. Bärenburg6.25011
    Locke Frankundfrei6.25011
    Anka v. Jagenberg6.25011
    Maestro De Wynen6.25011
    Xari v. Wolfsgrund6.25011
    Boss v. Silbersee6.25011
    Eyko v. Arlsberg6.25011
    Hella v. d. Lindenhöhe6.25011
    Faro v. d. Falkenweiden6.25011
    Elvi v. Lossetal6.25011
    Anka v. Kappelbuck6.25011
    Bill v. Bessingslust6.24022
    Dona v. Jägerhalle3.12011
    Cent Graf v. Amelsbüren3.12011
    Britta v. Lossetal3.12011
    Aslak v. Waldesgrün3.12011
    Erle v. Fichtenkopf3.12011
    Gero Frankundfrei3.12011
    Lutz v. Huywald3.12011
    Grandel v. d. Lindenhöhe3.12011
    Asta v. Rauhen Ebrach Tal3.12011
    Wido v. Schwege3.12011
    Bessi v. Haselbusch3.12011
    Natter v. Lönsstein3.12011
    Sonja v. Lönsstein3.12011
    Groll v. Reutherspfad3.12011
    Ino v. Kreyenhorst3.12011
    Citta v. Langen Siek3.12011
    Cäsar v. d. Zirkelquelle3.12011
    Cindy v. d. Kiefhornsmühle3.12011
    Drauf v. d. Lindenhöhe3.12011
    Berry v. Nordpark3.12011
    Cilli v. Grünen Wege3.12011
    Cita v. d. Tränke3.12011
    Kascha v. d. Bärenburg3.12011
    Drossel v. Hofried3.12011
    Bodo v. Weserstrand3.12011
    Candra v. Waldesgryn3.12011
    Falko v. d. Tränke3.12011

    Last updated Wednesday 23 November 2022 20:32 CET



    I have 🍪s