Pedigree Analysis

    Generations

    Coefficients of Kinship, Relationship and Inbreeding 5 Generations - Basko v. Tannengarten
    This page shows the inbreeding calculations for the dog you selected or the "Test Mating" you have entered. The calculations on this page are accurate to the point that they can only be made based upon the information in the database. For more detailed calculations please make sure that as many ancestors as possible are entered to the database.

    COI Calculation - Basko v. Tannengarten
    COI 5 gen: 0.195%    too low to be reliabe    Calculate COI again

    Please do the new calculation only if you have entered new ancestors of this dog!


    COI Calculation - Sire Eddy v. d. Pfauheck and Dam Jule v. Linduri
    Sire: COI 5 gen: 0.391%    too low to be reliabe    Calculate COI again

    Dam: COI 5 gen: 3.906%    very low    Calculate COI again

    Ancestor-Loss coefficient (ALC)
    This method doesn't replace the calculation of the COI but also gives important information for the breeder. Ancestor-Loss is given when the same ancestor appears more than once in the pedigree of the dog. A 5-generations-pedigree shows 62 possible ancestors. If one of this 62 possible ancestors appears twice, the dog in question has indeed only 61 different ancestors. If 3 ancestors appear twice, this dog has indeed only 59 different ancestors. The ALC is calculated out of the nr. of the ancestors and the total nr. of possible ancestors.

    # of dogs
    Ancestors in 5 Generations (max. 62)57
    Ancestor Loss5
    Ancestor Loss in %91.94 %

    Contributing Ancestors
    AncestorBlood %# of appearances12345
    Jule v. Linduri50.00011
    Eddy v. d. Pfauheck50.00011
    Groll v. Huntetal25.00011
    Aika v. d. Pfauheck25.00011
    Hesta v. Linduri25.00011
    Bodo v. Steyerberg25.00011
    Ossy De Wynen12.50011
    Drossel v. d. Grassel12.50011
    Troll v. Rheinufer12.50011
    Etzel v. Nörderkamp12.50011
    Ria v. d. Böckelsburg12.50022
    Hecht v. d. Königseiche12.50011
    Bonny v. Jägerkreuz12.50011
    Laika v. d. Waterkant12.50011
    Fango v. Nörderkamp12.50011
    Ajax v. Klockhof9.36033
    Anja v. Salinenblick6.25011
    Astor v. d. Weide6.25011
    Rig Chamavia6.25011
    Gundi v. d. Königseiche6.25011
    Enno v. Forstgarten6.25011
    Gilla v. Reinufer6.25011
    Arko v. Abtswald6.25011
    Britta v. Hasselbach6.25011
    Bob v. d. Schlei6.25011
    Ines v. d. Waterkant6.25011
    Itta De Wynen6.25011
    Artus v. d. Hasewiesen6.25011
    Alf v. Geierling6.25011
    Boss v. Silbersee6.25011
    Utz v. Lönsstein6.24022
    Olli v. d. Böckelsburg6.24022
    Citta v. Langen Siek3.12011
    Okai v. d. Holzheide3.12011
    Uhl v. Lönsstein3.12011
    Ino v. Kreyenhorst3.12011
    Ingo v. Schadwalde3.12011
    Anke v. d. Igelsheide3.12011
    Xandra v. Lönsstein3.12011
    Milla v. Feuersang3.12011
    Jenny v. Römersee3.12011
    Bianka v. d. Königseiche3.12011
    Cilly v. Waterkant3.12011
    Cora v. Tannenkamp3.12011
    Astor v. Hofried3.12011
    Birko v. Holsatia3.12011
    Etzel v. Sämmenhof3.12011
    Rasso v. Lönsstein3.12011
    Diwa v. Kampstüh3.12011
    Axel v. Fichtenhain3.12011
    Cäsar v. d. Hohen Geest3.12011
    Hussa v. Rheinufer3.12011
    Golo Dankwarder Ode3.12011
    Bussa v. Saaletal3.12011
    Anke v. Birkenhof3.12011
    Afra v. Seggehorn3.12011
    Dina v. Forstgarten3.12011

    Last updated Wednesday 23 November 2022 20:32 CET



    I have 🍪s