Pedigree Analysis

    Generations

    Coefficients of Kinship, Relationship and Inbreeding 5 Generations - Quell v. Huntetal
    This page shows the inbreeding calculations for the dog you selected or the "Test Mating" you have entered. The calculations on this page are accurate to the point that they can only be made based upon the information in the database. For more detailed calculations please make sure that as many ancestors as possible are entered to the database.

    COI Calculation - Quell v. Huntetal
    COI 5 gen: 0.000%    too low to be reliabe    Calculate COI again

    Please do the new calculation only if you have entered new ancestors of this dog!


    COI Calculation - Sire Henk v. Huntetal and Dam Maika v. Wiken
    Sire: COI 5 gen: 0.000%    too low to be reliabe    Calculate COI again

    Dam: COI 5 gen: 0.488%    too low to be reliabe    Calculate COI again

    Ancestor-Loss coefficient (ALC)
    This method doesn't replace the calculation of the COI but also gives important information for the breeder. Ancestor-Loss is given when the same ancestor appears more than once in the pedigree of the dog. A 5-generations-pedigree shows 62 possible ancestors. If one of this 62 possible ancestors appears twice, the dog in question has indeed only 61 different ancestors. If 3 ancestors appear twice, this dog has indeed only 59 different ancestors. The ALC is calculated out of the nr. of the ancestors and the total nr. of possible ancestors.

    # of dogs
    Ancestors in 5 Generations (max. 62)58
    Ancestor Loss4
    Ancestor Loss in %93.55 %

    Contributing Ancestors
    AncestorBlood %# of appearances12345
    Maika v. Wiken50.00011
    Henk v. Huntetal50.00011
    Fango v. Nörderkamp25.00011
    Elch v. Hanauer Land25.00011
    Laika v. d. Waterkant25.00011
    Fenja v. Rethwischer Moor25.00011
    Ajax v. Klockhof12.50022
    Ria v. d. Böckelsburg12.50011
    Aika v. Buchwald12.50011
    Enno v. Forstgarten12.50011
    Ines v. d. Waterkant12.50011
    Lord v. Hofried12.50011
    Bob v. d. Schlei12.50011
    Bonny v. Rethwischer Moor12.50011
    Bodo v. d. Hasenheide12.50011
    Groll Holsatia6.25011
    Graf v. Silbersee6.25011
    Anke v. Birkenhof6.25011
    Afra v. Grevensberg6.25011
    Birko v. Holsatia6.25011
    Ilka v. Elbufer6.25011
    Dina v. Forstgarten6.25011
    Bodo v. d. Kummel6.25011
    Rasso v. Lönsstein6.25011
    Cora v. Holmesborn6.25011
    Olli v. d. Böckelsburg6.25011
    Olga v. Bärenhorst6.25011
    Cilly v. Waterkant6.25011
    Cliff v. Linduri6.25011
    Bob v. d. Falloh6.24022
    Assi v. Nörderkamp6.24022
    Dina v. Steinroden6.24022
    Gabi v. Lönsstein3.12011
    Orlo v. d. Overbecker Mühle3.12011
    Drossel v. d. Grassel3.12011
    Asta v. Bartelskamp3.12011
    Alf Chamavia3.12011
    Kessy v. d. Böckelsburg3.12011
    Hektor v. d. Lindenhöhe3.12011
    Biene v. d. Nordheide3.12011
    Hanko v. Sämmenhof3.12011
    Etzel v. Nörderkamp3.12011
    Lissi v.d Böckelsburg3.12011
    Bona v. Hohen Geroldseck3.12011
    Freya v. Steinroden3.12011
    Cindy v. Tenntal3.12011
    Longa Fortuna3.12011
    Catja v. Niddatal3.12011
    Dolly v. Lossetal3.12011
    Dixi v. Elbufer3.12011
    Manto v. d. Düsterbeck3.12011
    Morro v. Feuersang3.12011
    Groll v. Reutherspfad3.12011
    Basko v. Neuenhof3.12011
    Utz v. Lönsstein3.12011
    Bautz v. Mönchsbrunnen3.12011
    Paris v. d. Waterkant3.12011
    Boss v. Silbersee3.12011

    Last updated Wednesday 23 November 2022 20:32 CET



    I have 🍪s