Pedigree Analysis

    Generations

    Coefficients of Kinship, Relationship and Inbreeding 5 Generations - Heidehexe v. Lönsstein
    This page shows the inbreeding calculations for the dog you selected or the "Test Mating" you have entered. The calculations on this page are accurate to the point that they can only be made based upon the information in the database. For more detailed calculations please make sure that as many ancestors as possible are entered to the database.

    COI Calculation - Heidehexe v. Lönsstein
    COI 5 gen: 0.977%    too low to be reliabe    Calculate COI again

    Please do the new calculation only if you have entered new ancestors of this dog!


    COI Calculation - Sire Bautz v. d. Leda and Dam Gera v. Lönsstein
    Sire: COI 5 gen: 7.031%    low    Calculate COI again

    Dam: COI 5 gen: 0.391%    too low to be reliabe    Calculate COI again

    Ancestor-Loss coefficient (ALC)
    This method doesn't replace the calculation of the COI but also gives important information for the breeder. Ancestor-Loss is given when the same ancestor appears more than once in the pedigree of the dog. A 5-generations-pedigree shows 62 possible ancestors. If one of this 62 possible ancestors appears twice, the dog in question has indeed only 61 different ancestors. If 3 ancestors appear twice, this dog has indeed only 59 different ancestors. The ALC is calculated out of the nr. of the ancestors and the total nr. of possible ancestors.

    # of dogs
    Ancestors in 5 Generations (max. 62)58
    Ancestor Loss4
    Ancestor Loss in %93.55 %

    Contributing Ancestors
    AncestorBlood %# of appearances12345
    Bautz v. d. Leda50.00011
    Gera v. Lönsstein50.00011
    Bruna v. Lönsstein25.00011
    Graf v. Silbersee25.00011
    Bobby v. d. Hasenheide25.00011
    Gitta v. Lossetal25.00011
    Uhl v. Lönsstein15.620211
    Flocke v. d. Tränke15.620211
    Hektor v. d. Lindenhöhe12.50011
    Boss v. Silbersee12.50011
    Dolly v. Lossetal12.50011
    Cita v. Winterberg12.50011
    Olga v. Bärenhorst12.50011
    Cliff v. Linduri12.50011
    Natter v. Lönsstein9.370211
    Bodo v. Weserstrand9.370211
    Cent Graf v. Amelsbüren6.25011
    Paris v. d. Waterkant6.25011
    Ino v. Kreyenhorst6.25011
    Esko Vun'N Wischhoff6.25011
    Citta v. Langen Siek6.25011
    Drossel v. d. Grassel6.25011
    Cita v. d. Tränke6.25011
    Bill v. Bessingslust6.25011
    Grandel v. d. Lindenhöhe6.25011
    Etzel v. Nörderkamp6.25011
    Groll v. Reutherspfad6.25011
    Ute v. Lönsstein6.25011
    Britta v. Lossetal6.25011
    Asta v. Bartelskamp6.25011
    Donar v. Alten Zollhaus3.12011
    Grandt v. d. Uhrau3.12011
    Astor v. d. Weide3.12011
    Alf v. d. Waterkant3.12011
    Arno v. Karlshof3.12011
    Cessie v. Holundereck3.12011
    Boss Holsatia3.12011
    Britta v. Bärenhorst3.12011
    Gero v. Wiken3.12011
    Ysa v. Rudenhay3.12011
    Argo v. Bergwinkel3.12011
    Anka v. Lönsstein3.12011
    Birko v. Holsatia3.12011
    Diva v. d. Uhrau3.12011
    Assi v. Lönsstein3.12011
    Ria v. d. Böckelsburg3.12011
    Fenna v. Kreyenhorst3.12011
    Drauf v. d. Lindenhöhe3.12011
    Citta v. Arlsberg3.12011
    Ines v. d. Waterkant3.12011
    Britta v. Hasselbach3.12011
    Zent v. Feuersang3.12011
    Freifrau v. d. Overbecker Mühle3.12011
    Arco v. Reutherspfad3.12011
    Artus v. d. Hasewiesen3.12011
    Biene v. Ringofen3.12011
    Bill v. Straufhain3.12011
    Heidi v. Lönsstein3.12011

    Last updated Wednesday 23 November 2022 20:32 CET



    I have 🍪s