Pedigree Analysis

    Generations

    Coefficients of Kinship, Relationship and Inbreeding 5 Generations - Franzi v. Stockey
    This page shows the inbreeding calculations for the dog you selected or the "Test Mating" you have entered. The calculations on this page are accurate to the point that they can only be made based upon the information in the database. For more detailed calculations please make sure that as many ancestors as possible are entered to the database.

    COI Calculation - Franzi v. Stockey
    COI 5 gen: 0.000%    too low to be reliabe    Calculate COI again

    Please do the new calculation only if you have entered new ancestors of this dog!


    COI Calculation - Sire Bero v. Örtzefluss and Dam Chica v. d. Hafkesdell
    Sire: COI 5 gen: 0.977%    too low to be reliabe    Calculate COI again

    Dam: COI 5 gen: 0.195%    too low to be reliabe    Calculate COI again

    Ancestor-Loss coefficient (ALC)
    This method doesn't replace the calculation of the COI but also gives important information for the breeder. Ancestor-Loss is given when the same ancestor appears more than once in the pedigree of the dog. A 5-generations-pedigree shows 62 possible ancestors. If one of this 62 possible ancestors appears twice, the dog in question has indeed only 61 different ancestors. If 3 ancestors appear twice, this dog has indeed only 59 different ancestors. The ALC is calculated out of the nr. of the ancestors and the total nr. of possible ancestors.

    # of dogs
    Ancestors in 5 Generations (max. 62)59
    Ancestor Loss3
    Ancestor Loss in %95.16 %

    Contributing Ancestors
    AncestorBlood %# of appearances12345
    Bero v. Örtzefluss50.00011
    Chica v. d. Hafkesdell50.00011
    Osca v. Bärenhorst25.00011
    Dina Chamavia25.00011
    Alf v. Siegbogen25.00011
    Aischa v. Cellerland25.00011
    Harro v. Lossetal12.50011
    Uta Chamavia12.50011
    Josi v. Königsfeld12.50011
    Jade v. Bärenhorst12.50011
    Cliff v. Linduri12.50011
    Paris v. d. Waterkant12.50011
    Asta v. Bartelskamp12.50011
    Erko v. Jahnplatz12.50011
    Wido v. Schwege9.370211
    Dunja v. d. Krausen Eiche6.25011
    Certa v. Bärenhorst6.25011
    Etzel v. Nörderkamp6.25011
    Jenny v. Römersee6.25011
    Boss Holsatia6.25011
    Britta v. Lossetal6.25011
    Boss v. Silbersee6.25011
    Lord v. Reinufer6.25011
    Astor v. Hofried6.25011
    Freya v. Sämmenhof6.25011
    Britta v. Bärenhorst6.25011
    Gero v. Wiken6.25011
    Ines v. d. Waterkant6.25011
    Eiko Vun'N Wischhoff6.25011
    Drossel v. d. Grassel6.25011
    Unda v. Lönsstein6.24022
    Asta v. Totengrund3.12011
    Delta v. Langen Siek3.12011
    Uhl v. Lönsstein3.12011
    Morro v. Feuersang3.12011
    Groll v. Reutherspfad3.12011
    Ria v. d. Böckelsburg3.12011
    Cilly v. Waterkant3.12011
    Rasso v. Lönsstein3.12011
    Britta v. Hasselbach3.12011
    Manto v. d. Düsterbeck3.12011
    Falk v. Lönsstein3.12011
    Thanhausen's Abke3.12011
    Birko v. Holsatia3.12011
    Asso v. Stubben3.12011
    Blitz v. Weithof3.12011
    Artus v. d. Hasewiesen3.12011
    Astor v. d. Weide3.12011
    Biene v. Ringofen3.12011
    Quinti v. Schwege3.12011
    Citta v. Langen Siek3.12011
    Flocke v. d. Tränke3.12011
    Enno Holsatia3.12011
    Ino v. Kreyenhorst3.12011
    Dina v. Steinroden3.12011
    Pascha v. d. Binnenelbe3.12011
    Heike v. Sämmenhof3.12011
    Anka v. d. Vereinigung3.12011
    Gero v. Sämmenhof3.12011

    Last updated Wednesday 23 November 2022 20:32 CET



    I have 🍪s