Pedigree Analysis

    Generations

    Coefficients of Kinship, Relationship and Inbreeding 5 Generations - Eik v. Herrenmoor
    This page shows the inbreeding calculations for the dog you selected or the "Test Mating" you have entered. The calculations on this page are accurate to the point that they can only be made based upon the information in the database. For more detailed calculations please make sure that as many ancestors as possible are entered to the database.

    COI Calculation - Eik v. Herrenmoor
    COI 5 gen: 1.562%    very very low    Calculate COI again

    Please do the new calculation only if you have entered new ancestors of this dog!


    COI Calculation - Sire Arco v. Backemeer and Dam Dina v. Herrenmoor
    Sire: COI 5 gen: 1.172%    very very low    Calculate COI again

    Dam: COI 5 gen: 0.000%    too low to be reliabe    Calculate COI again

    Ancestor-Loss coefficient (ALC)
    This method doesn't replace the calculation of the COI but also gives important information for the breeder. Ancestor-Loss is given when the same ancestor appears more than once in the pedigree of the dog. A 5-generations-pedigree shows 62 possible ancestors. If one of this 62 possible ancestors appears twice, the dog in question has indeed only 61 different ancestors. If 3 ancestors appear twice, this dog has indeed only 59 different ancestors. The ALC is calculated out of the nr. of the ancestors and the total nr. of possible ancestors.

    # of dogs
    Ancestors in 5 Generations (max. 62)57
    Ancestor Loss5
    Ancestor Loss in %91.94 %

    Contributing Ancestors
    AncestorBlood %# of appearances12345
    Dina v. Herrenmoor50.00011
    Arco v. Backemeer50.00011
    Jonas Vun'N Wischhoff25.00011
    Jule v. Bärenhorst25.00011
    Hakon v. Forstgarten25.00011
    Anke v. Keenmoor25.00011
    Cent v. Hasselbach12.50011
    Cent v. Hofried12.50011
    Anka v. Birkenhaus12.50011
    Eika Vun'N Wischhoff12.50011
    Etzel v. Nörderkamp12.50011
    Certa v. Bärenhorst12.50011
    Boss v. Silbersee12.50011
    Dina v. Forstgarten12.50011
    Groll v. Reutherspfad9.370211
    Biene v. Ringofen9.370211
    Unda v. Lönsstein9.370211
    Birko v. Holsatia9.370211
    Citta v. Langen Siek6.25011
    Asta v. Hofried6.25011
    Uhl v. Lönsstein6.25011
    Esko Vun'N Wischhoff6.25011
    Orlo v. d. Overbecker Mühle6.25011
    Cora v. Bärenhorst6.25011
    Ass v. d. Schlei6.25011
    Diwa v. Kampstüh6.25011
    Ria v. d. Böckelsburg6.25011
    Ino v. Kreyenhorst6.25011
    Artus v. d. Hasewiesen6.25011
    Freya v. Steinroden6.25011
    Ajax v. Klockhof6.24022
    Dina v. Steinroden3.12011
    Beste v. Lönsstein3.12011
    Gero v. Sämmenhof3.12011
    Asta v. Werlacke3.12011
    Heike v. Sämmenhof3.12011
    Bodo v. Weserstrand3.12011
    Ingo v. Schadwalde3.12011
    Zent v. Feuersang3.12011
    Cilli v. Berghof3.12011
    Heidi v. Lönsstein3.12011
    Tim v. Feuersang3.12011
    Gambo v. Werlacke3.12011
    Alf v. d. Waterkant3.12011
    Arno v. Karlshof3.12011
    Etzel v. Sämmenhof3.12011
    Alard v. d. Leda3.12011
    Olli v. d. Böckelsburg3.12011
    Fenna v. Kreyenhorst3.12011
    Jenka v. d. Overbecker Mühle3.12011
    Cora v. Tannenkamp3.12011
    Manto v. d. Düsterbeck3.12011
    Arco v. Reutherspfad3.12011
    Gina Dankwarder Ode3.12011
    Anke v. Birkenhof3.12011
    Anka v. Lönsstein3.12011
    Natter v. Lönsstein3.12011

    Last updated Wednesday 23 November 2022 20:32 CET



    I have 🍪s