Pedigree Analysis

    Generations

    Coefficients of Kinship, Relationship and Inbreeding 5 Generations - Nena Nelha
    This page shows the inbreeding calculations for the dog you selected or the "Test Mating" you have entered. The calculations on this page are accurate to the point that they can only be made based upon the information in the database. For more detailed calculations please make sure that as many ancestors as possible are entered to the database.

    COI Calculation - Nena Nelha
    COI 5 gen: 0.391%    too low to be reliabe    Calculate COI again

    Please do the new calculation only if you have entered new ancestors of this dog!


    COI Calculation - Sire Cäsar v. Elsternkamp and Dam Birke Nelha
    Sire: COI 5 gen: 0.391%    too low to be reliabe    Calculate COI again

    Dam: COI 5 gen: 1.562%    very very low    Calculate COI again

    Ancestor-Loss coefficient (ALC)
    This method doesn't replace the calculation of the COI but also gives important information for the breeder. Ancestor-Loss is given when the same ancestor appears more than once in the pedigree of the dog. A 5-generations-pedigree shows 62 possible ancestors. If one of this 62 possible ancestors appears twice, the dog in question has indeed only 61 different ancestors. If 3 ancestors appear twice, this dog has indeed only 59 different ancestors. The ALC is calculated out of the nr. of the ancestors and the total nr. of possible ancestors.

    # of dogs
    Ancestors in 5 Generations (max. 62)59
    Ancestor Loss3
    Ancestor Loss in %95.16 %

    Contributing Ancestors
    AncestorBlood %# of appearances12345
    Birke Nelha50.00011
    Cäsar v. Elsternkamp50.00011
    Alo v. Burgstall25.00011
    Nixe v. Lossetal25.00011
    Cliff v. Linduri25.00011
    Biene v. Siegbogen25.00011
    Solojäger's Anka12.50011
    Josi v. Königsfeld12.50011
    Hasso v. Langen Siek12.50011
    Alf v. Waldhaus12.50011
    Benno v. d. Haalquelle12.50011
    Britta v. Lossetal12.50011
    Drossel v. d. Grassel12.50011
    Etzel v. Nörderkamp12.50011
    Artus v. d. Hasewiesen9.370211
    Dux v. Silbersee6.25011
    Flocke v. d. Tränke6.25011
    Hilda v. d. Hasewiesen6.25011
    Yra v. d. Holzheide6.25011
    Dux v. Jahnplatz6.25011
    Cäsar v. d. Zirkelquelle6.25011
    Cäsar v. Bruckhof6.25011
    Ria v. d. Böckelsburg6.25011
    Quitta Fortuna6.25011
    Dunja v. d. Krausen Eiche6.25011
    Britta v. Hasselbach6.25011
    Uhl v. Lönsstein6.25011
    Edda v. Jurawald6.25011
    Lord v. Reinufer6.25011
    Astor v. d. Weide6.25011
    Bodo v. Weserstrand6.24022
    Moritz v. Sämmenhof6.24022
    Cita v. d. Donauauen3.12011
    Wido v. Schwege3.12011
    Cent Graf v. Amelsbüren3.12011
    Cora v. Tannenkamp3.12011
    Arrak v. Hagenpolder3.12011
    Diwa v. Kampstüh3.12011
    Olli v. d. Böckelsburg3.12011
    Katja Germania3.12011
    Golo Dankwarder Ode3.12011
    Ajax v. Klockhof3.12011
    Ino v. Kreyenhorst3.12011
    Blitz v. Weithof3.12011
    Afra v. Seggehorn3.12011
    Osa Fortuna3.12011
    Anka v. d. Vereinigung3.12011
    Natter v. Lönsstein3.12011
    Thanhausen's Abke3.12011
    Morro v. Feuersang3.12011
    Citta v. Langen Siek3.12011
    Utz v. Lönsstein3.12011
    Cessy v. Hofried3.12011
    Cita v. d. Tränke3.12011
    Gero v. Sämmenhof3.12011
    Anja v. Taubertal3.12011
    Hella v. d. Moorbrücke3.12011
    Ingo v. Schadwalde3.12011
    Carry v. d. Hasewiesen3.12011

    Last updated Wednesday 23 November 2022 20:32 CET



    I have 🍪s