Pedigree Analysis

    Generations

    Coefficients of Kinship, Relationship and Inbreeding 5 Generations - Frieda v. Wuddelhoff
    This page shows the inbreeding calculations for the dog you selected or the "Test Mating" you have entered. The calculations on this page are accurate to the point that they can only be made based upon the information in the database. For more detailed calculations please make sure that as many ancestors as possible are entered to the database.

    COI Calculation - Frieda v. Wuddelhoff
    COI 5 gen: 0.586%    too low to be reliabe    Calculate COI again

    Please do the new calculation only if you have entered new ancestors of this dog!


    COI Calculation - Sire Cäsar v. Elsternkamp and Dam Andra v. Wuddelhoff
    Sire: COI 5 gen: 0.391%    too low to be reliabe    Calculate COI again

    Dam: COI 5 gen: 0.391%    too low to be reliabe    Calculate COI again

    Ancestor-Loss coefficient (ALC)
    This method doesn't replace the calculation of the COI but also gives important information for the breeder. Ancestor-Loss is given when the same ancestor appears more than once in the pedigree of the dog. A 5-generations-pedigree shows 62 possible ancestors. If one of this 62 possible ancestors appears twice, the dog in question has indeed only 61 different ancestors. If 3 ancestors appear twice, this dog has indeed only 59 different ancestors. The ALC is calculated out of the nr. of the ancestors and the total nr. of possible ancestors.

    # of dogs
    Ancestors in 5 Generations (max. 62)73
    Ancestor Loss-11
    Ancestor Loss in %117.74 %

    Contributing Ancestors
    AncestorBlood %# of appearances12345
    Cäsar v. Elsternkamp53.120211
    Andra v. Wuddelhoff50.00011
    Biene v. Siegbogen25.00011
    Alo v. Burgstall25.00011
    Esko v. Huntetal25.00011
    Gina L v. Rodekopp25.00011
    Britt Aus Grupilinga25.00011
    Fritz v. Kiekenbruch25.00011
    Josi v. Königsfeld12.50011
    Elsbeth v. Rodekopp12.50011
    Solojäger's Unkas12.50011
    Chico v. Borgkamp12.50011
    Hasso v. Langen Siek12.50011
    Laika v. d. Waterkant12.50011
    Esta v. Ruthenstrom12.50011
    Clara v. Kiekenbruch12.50011
    Etzel v. Nörderkamp12.50011
    Basco v. Matzental12.50011
    Dunja v. d. Krausen Eiche6.25011
    Aika v. Rodekopp6.25011
    Alin v. Ruthenstrom6.25011
    Elch v. Hanauer Land6.25011
    Greif v. Reitbach6.25011
    Bob v. d. Schlei6.25011
    Esko Vun'N Wischhoff6.25011
    Isko v. Lönsstein6.25011
    Solojäger's Maraun6.25011
    Ria v. d. Böckelsburg6.25011
    Asta v. Pamesgrub6.25011
    Xari v. Wolfsgrund6.25011
    Yda v. d. Binnenelbe6.25011
    Lord v. Reinufer6.25011
    Elvi v. Lossetal6.25011
    Orka v. d. Drachheide6.25011
    Osca Aus Grupilinga6.25011
    Artus v. d. Hasewiesen6.25011
    Ines v. d. Waterkant6.25011
    Dele v. Paradies6.25011
    Ajax v. Klockhof6.24022
    Anke v. Birkenhof3.12011
    Arrak v. Hagenpolder3.12011
    Hajo Aus Grupilinga3.12011
    Gabi v.d. Röthaller3.12011
    Blitz v. Weithof3.12011
    Sonja v. Lönsstein3.12011
    Rika v. Linduri3.12011
    Wido v. Schwege3.12011
    Ingo v. Schadwalde3.12011
    Aury v. Waidbosch3.12011
    Etzel v. d. Pfauheck3.12011
    Alic v. Basbek3.12011
    Uhl v. Lönsstein3.12011
    Bodo v. d. Hasenheide3.12011
    Jola Nelha3.12011
    Castor v. d. Hirtenburg3.12011
    Cord v. Wasserplatz3.12011
    Cora v. Tannenkamp3.12011
    Birko v. Holsatia3.12011
    Tanja De Wynen3.12011
    Unda v. Bärenhorst3.12011
    Dax v. Forst Ostenwalde3.12011
    Bessy v. Ahnherrn3.12011
    Anka v. d. Vereinigung3.12011
    Rasso v. Lönsstein3.12011
    Aika v. Buchwald3.12011
    Arras v. Eschbach3.12011
    Olli v. d. Böckelsburg3.12011
    Morro v. Feuersang3.12011
    Thanhausen's Abke3.12011
    Flocke v. d. Tränke3.12011
    Elsa v. Burghöft3.12011
    Solojäger's Laura3.12011
    Cilly v. Waterkant3.12011
    Bautz v. d. Leda3.12011
    Annett v. Paradies3.12011
    Biene v. Ringofen3.12011

    Last updated Wednesday 23 November 2022 20:32 CET



    I have 🍪s