Pedigree Analysis

    Generations

    Coefficients of Kinship, Relationship and Inbreeding 5 Generations - Elfe v. Linebrok
    This page shows the inbreeding calculations for the dog you selected or the "Test Mating" you have entered. The calculations on this page are accurate to the point that they can only be made based upon the information in the database. For more detailed calculations please make sure that as many ancestors as possible are entered to the database.

    COI Calculation - Elfe v. Linebrok
    COI 5 gen: 0.000%    too low to be reliabe    Calculate COI again

    Please do the new calculation only if you have entered new ancestors of this dog!


    COI Calculation - Sire Bautz v. d. Leda and Dam Hella v. Nörderkamp
    Sire: COI 5 gen: 6.250%    low    Calculate COI again

    Dam: COI 5 gen: 4.688%    very low    Calculate COI again

    Ancestor-Loss coefficient (ALC)
    This method doesn't replace the calculation of the COI but also gives important information for the breeder. Ancestor-Loss is given when the same ancestor appears more than once in the pedigree of the dog. A 5-generations-pedigree shows 62 possible ancestors. If one of this 62 possible ancestors appears twice, the dog in question has indeed only 61 different ancestors. If 3 ancestors appear twice, this dog has indeed only 59 different ancestors. The ALC is calculated out of the nr. of the ancestors and the total nr. of possible ancestors.

    # of dogs
    Ancestors in 5 Generations (max. 62)56
    Ancestor Loss6
    Ancestor Loss in %90.32 %

    Contributing Ancestors
    AncestorBlood %# of appearances12345
    Bautz v. d. Leda50.00011
    Hella v. Nörderkamp50.00011
    Groll v. Huntetal25.00011
    Graf v. Silbersee25.00011
    Cora v. Linebrok25.00011
    Gitta v. Lossetal25.00011
    Uhl v. Lönsstein15.620211
    Flocke v. d. Tränke15.620211
    Boss v. Silbersee12.50011
    Dolly v. Lossetal12.50011
    Etzel v. Nörderkamp12.50011
    Laika v. d. Waterkant12.50011
    Quecke v. Haberland12.50011
    Ria v. d. Böckelsburg12.50022
    Fango v. Nörderkamp12.50011
    Ajax v. Klockhof9.36033
    Cita v. d. Tränke6.25011
    Citta v. Langen Siek6.25011
    Orlo v. d. Overbecker Mühle6.25011
    Bodo v. Weserstrand6.25011
    Enno v. Forstgarten6.25011
    Cent Graf v. Amelsbüren6.25011
    Ines v. d. Waterkant6.25011
    Ino v. Kreyenhorst6.25011
    Artus v. d. Hasewiesen6.25011
    Groll v. Reutherspfad6.25011
    Mona v. Haberland6.25011
    Britta v. Lossetal6.25011
    Natter v. Lönsstein6.25011
    Bob v. d. Schlei6.25011
    Olli v. d. Böckelsburg6.24022
    Diva v. d. Uhrau3.12011
    Dina v. Forstgarten3.12011
    Fenna v. Kreyenhorst3.12011
    Cilly v. Waterkant3.12011
    Ingo v. Schadwalde3.12011
    Freifrau v. d. Overbecker Mühle3.12011
    Alard v. d. Leda3.12011
    Birko v. Holsatia3.12011
    Dolli v. d. Jagdhütte3.12011
    Arco v. Reutherspfad3.12011
    Heidi v. Lönsstein3.12011
    Cora v. Tannenkamp3.12011
    Alf v. d. Waterkant3.12011
    Ysa v. Rudenhay3.12011
    Grandt v. d. Uhrau3.12011
    Rasso v. Lönsstein3.12011
    Zent v. Feuersang3.12011
    Donar v. Alten Zollhaus3.12011
    Jenka v. d. Overbecker Mühle3.12011
    Arno v. Karlshof3.12011
    Anka v. Lönsstein3.12011
    Anke v. Birkenhof3.12011
    Argo v. Bergwinkel3.12011
    Assi v. Lönsstein3.12011
    Kimo v. Haberland3.12011

    Last updated Wednesday 23 November 2022 20:32 CET



    I have 🍪s