Pedigree Analysis

    Generations

    Coefficients of Kinship, Relationship and Inbreeding 5 Generations - Kongsbekkens Hekla
    This page shows the inbreeding calculations for the dog you selected or the "Test Mating" you have entered. The calculations on this page are accurate to the point that they can only be made based upon the information in the database. For more detailed calculations please make sure that as many ancestors as possible are entered to the database.

    COI Calculation - Kongsbekkens Hekla
    COI 5 gen: 0.000%    too low to be reliabe    Calculate COI again

    Please do the new calculation only if you have entered new ancestors of this dog!


    COI Calculation - Sire Alli v. d. Hasenheide and Dam Tangaraasens A'Corra
    Sire: COI 5 gen: 1.270%    very very low    Calculate COI again

    Dam: COI 5 gen: 0.586%    too low to be reliabe    Calculate COI again

    Ancestor-Loss coefficient (ALC)
    This method doesn't replace the calculation of the COI but also gives important information for the breeder. Ancestor-Loss is given when the same ancestor appears more than once in the pedigree of the dog. A 5-generations-pedigree shows 62 possible ancestors. If one of this 62 possible ancestors appears twice, the dog in question has indeed only 61 different ancestors. If 3 ancestors appear twice, this dog has indeed only 59 different ancestors. The ALC is calculated out of the nr. of the ancestors and the total nr. of possible ancestors.

    # of dogs
    Ancestors in 5 Generations (max. 62)61
    Ancestor Loss1
    Ancestor Loss in %98.39 %

    Contributing Ancestors
    AncestorBlood %# of appearances12345
    Tangaraasens A'Corra50.00011
    Alli v. d. Hasenheide50.00011
    Biene v. Birkenhaus25.00011
    Baldur v. Lönsstein25.00011
    Bamse25.00011
    Akita25.00011
    Cita v. Winterberg12.50011
    Enno Holsatia12.50011
    Lizzy12.50011
    Amigo12.50011
    Cora v. Bärenhorst12.50011
    Hektor v. d. Lindenhöhe12.50011
    Bessi12.50011
    Alf v. Geierling12.50011
    Dina v. Steinroden6.25011
    Atze v. Hagenpolder6.25011
    Bill v. Bessingslust6.25011
    Anuschka v. Basbeck6.25011
    Groll v. Reutherspfad6.25011
    Ute v. Lönsstein6.25011
    Esko Vun'N Wischhoff6.25011
    Nero v. Wolfsgrund6.25011
    Morro v. Feuersang6.25011
    Okai v. d. Holzheide6.25011
    Unda v. Lönsstein6.25011
    Gitta v. Rudenhay6.25011
    Anke v. d. Igelsheide6.25011
    Gitta v. Fährhaus6.25011
    Grandel v. d. Lindenhöhe6.25011
    Arno v. Ringofen6.25011
    Biene v. Ringofen3.12011
    Arko v. d. Waterkant3.12011
    Bodo v. Weserstrand3.12011
    Citta v. Arlsberg3.12011
    Hesta v. Lönsstein3.12011
    Lore v. Fleestedt3.12011
    Heidi v. Lönsstein3.12011
    Nadja v. d. Düsterbeck3.12011
    Iska v. Wolfsgrund3.12011
    Donni v. Rüdenhay3.12011
    Cessie v. Holundereck3.12011
    Tasso v. Feuersang3.12011
    Falk v. d. Overbeckermühle3.12011
    Axel v. Lönsstein3.12011
    Gina Dankwarder Ode3.12011
    Cilli v. Berghof3.12011
    Arco v. Reutherspfad3.12011
    Golo Dankwarder Ode3.12011
    Asta v. Werlacke3.12011
    Bill v. Straufhain3.12011
    Drauf v. d. Lindenhöhe3.12011
    Nadja v. Lönsstein3.12011
    Birko v. Holsatia3.12011
    Gambo v. Werlacke3.12011
    Illa v. Feuersang3.12011
    Jutta v. Odisheim3.12011
    Natter v. Lönsstein3.12011
    Boris v. Langen Siek3.12011
    Infant v. Feuersang3.12011
    Falk v. Lönsstein3.12011
    Fango v. Waterkant3.12011

    Last updated Wednesday 23 November 2022 20:32 CET



    I have 🍪s