Pedigree Analysis

    Generations

    Coefficients of Kinship, Relationship and Inbreeding 5 Generations - Alice v. Wiebusch
    This page shows the inbreeding calculations for the dog you selected or the "Test Mating" you have entered. The calculations on this page are accurate to the point that they can only be made based upon the information in the database. For more detailed calculations please make sure that as many ancestors as possible are entered to the database.

    COI Calculation - Alice v. Wiebusch
    COI 5 gen: 0.977%    too low to be reliabe    Calculate COI again

    Please do the new calculation only if you have entered new ancestors of this dog!


    COI Calculation - Sire Filou v. Alten Hafen and Dam Cora v. d. Pfauheck
    Sire: COI 5 gen: 1.758%    very very low    Calculate COI again

    Dam: COI 5 gen: 3.320%    very low    Calculate COI again

    Ancestor-Loss coefficient (ALC)
    This method doesn't replace the calculation of the COI but also gives important information for the breeder. Ancestor-Loss is given when the same ancestor appears more than once in the pedigree of the dog. A 5-generations-pedigree shows 62 possible ancestors. If one of this 62 possible ancestors appears twice, the dog in question has indeed only 61 different ancestors. If 3 ancestors appear twice, this dog has indeed only 59 different ancestors. The ALC is calculated out of the nr. of the ancestors and the total nr. of possible ancestors.

    # of dogs
    Ancestors in 5 Generations (max. 62)72
    Ancestor Loss-10
    Ancestor Loss in %116.13 %

    Contributing Ancestors
    AncestorBlood %# of appearances12345
    Cora v. d. Pfauheck50.00011
    Filou v. Alten Hafen50.00011
    Fleur50.00011
    Benno v. d. Sorge50.00011
    Asja v. Alten Hafen25.00011
    Hecht v. Wulfshagen25.00011
    Bonny v. Jägerkreuz25.00011
    Vallensbæks Manja25.00011
    Arko v. Kammerforst25.00011
    Dandy v. Roonstein25.00011
    Zent v. Feuersang15.620211
    Uhl v. Lönsstein15.610413
    Anja v. Salinenblick12.50011
    Nora v. Hahnenkamm12.50011
    Eiko v. Weithof12.50011
    Harro v. Lossetal12.50011
    Flora v. Wulfhagen12.50011
    Chico v. Borgkamp12.50011
    Petra v. Lönsstein12.50011
    Vella v. Fährhaus12.50011
    Arko v. Abtswald12.50011
    Bine v. Sünnekenbusch12.50011
    Flott v. Rüdenhay12.50011
    Cäsar v. d. Zirkelquelle6.25011
    Diana v. Hofried6.25011
    Elvi v. Lossetal6.25011
    Katja Germania6.25011
    Babsy v. Weberhof6.25011
    Bussa v. Saaletal6.25011
    King v. Fährhaus6.25011
    Cent v. Reutherspfad6.25011
    Lord v. Schadwalde6.25011
    Britta v. Lossetal6.25011
    Bodo v. Wulfhagen6.25011
    Ova v. Fährhaus6.25011
    Korda v. Feuersang6.25011
    Eiko Vun'N Wischhoff6.25011
    Chef v. Clemenswerth6.25011
    Cäsar v. d. Falloh6.25011
    Laila v. d. Overbecker Mühle6.25011
    Fee Germania6.25011
    Donni v. Rüdenhay6.25011
    Axel v. Fichtenhain6.25011
    Cäsar v. d. Hohen Geest6.25011
    Hussa v. Rheinufer6.25011
    Xari v. Wolfsgrund6.25011
    Flocke v. d. Tränke6.24022
    Wido v. Schwege6.24022
    Alan Z Serikoveho Kraje3.12011
    Jenka v. d. Overbecker Mühle3.12011
    Amsel v. d. Leda3.12011
    Basko v. Neuenhof3.12011
    Astra v. Klosterberg3.12011
    Karla v. Lönsstein3.12011
    Biene v. Ringofen3.12011
    Cuno v. d. Frankenburg3.12011
    Afra v. Elisenhof3.12011
    Adda v. Wetternwege3.12011
    Imme v. Feuersang3.12011
    Natter v. Lönsstein3.12011
    Hella v. d. Moorbrücke3.12011
    Gero v. Sämmenhof3.12011
    Asta v. Hofried3.12011
    Birko v. Holsatia3.12011
    Elko v. Turkenweg3.12011
    Bodo v. Weserstrand3.12011
    Benn v. Moorkamp3.12011
    Whisky v. Schwege3.12011
    Gabi v. d. Frankenburg3.12011
    Sonja v. Lönsstein3.12011
    Anka v. d. Vereinigung3.12011
    Piter v. Feuersang3.12011

    Last updated Wednesday 23 November 2022 20:32 CET



    I have 🍪s