Pedigree Analysis

    Generations

    Coefficients of Kinship, Relationship and Inbreeding 5 Generations - Maika v. Wiken
    This page shows the inbreeding calculations for the dog you selected or the "Test Mating" you have entered. The calculations on this page are accurate to the point that they can only be made based upon the information in the database. For more detailed calculations please make sure that as many ancestors as possible are entered to the database.

    COI Calculation - Maika v. Wiken
    COI 5 gen: 0.488%    too low to be reliabe    Calculate COI again

    Please do the new calculation only if you have entered new ancestors of this dog!


    COI Calculation - Sire Elch v. Hanauer Land and Dam Fenja v. Rethwischer Moor
    Sire: COI 5 gen: 0.781%    too low to be reliabe    Calculate COI again

    Dam: COI 5 gen: 3.125%    very low    Calculate COI again

    Ancestor-Loss coefficient (ALC)
    This method doesn't replace the calculation of the COI but also gives important information for the breeder. Ancestor-Loss is given when the same ancestor appears more than once in the pedigree of the dog. A 5-generations-pedigree shows 62 possible ancestors. If one of this 62 possible ancestors appears twice, the dog in question has indeed only 61 different ancestors. If 3 ancestors appear twice, this dog has indeed only 59 different ancestors. The ALC is calculated out of the nr. of the ancestors and the total nr. of possible ancestors.

    # of dogs
    Ancestors in 5 Generations (max. 62)60
    Ancestor Loss2
    Ancestor Loss in %96.77 %

    Contributing Ancestors
    AncestorBlood %# of appearances12345
    Fenja v. Rethwischer Moor50.00011
    Elch v. Hanauer Land50.00011
    Lord v. Hofried25.00011
    Bodo v. d. Hasenheide25.00011
    Bonny v. Rethwischer Moor25.00011
    Aika v. Buchwald25.00011
    Groll Holsatia15.620211
    Graf v. Silbersee12.50011
    Ilka v. Elbufer12.50011
    Bodo v. d. Kummel12.50011
    Cora v. Holmesborn12.50011
    Afra v. Grevensberg12.50011
    Olga v. Bärenhorst12.50011
    Cliff v. Linduri12.50011
    Groll v. Reutherspfad9.370211
    Dina v. Steinroden6.25011
    Catja v. Niddatal6.25011
    Asta v. Bartelskamp6.25011
    Drossel v. d. Grassel6.25011
    Kessy v. d. Böckelsburg6.25011
    Utz v. Lönsstein6.25011
    Hektor v. d. Lindenhöhe6.25011
    Etzel v. Nörderkamp6.25011
    Cindy v. Tenntal6.25011
    Hanko v. Sämmenhof6.25011
    Dolly v. Lossetal6.25011
    Dixi v. Elbufer6.25011
    Bautz v. Mönchsbrunnen6.25011
    Paris v. d. Waterkant6.25011
    Boss v. Silbersee6.25011
    Bodo v. Weserstrand3.12011
    Citta v. Langen Siek3.12011
    Ria v. d. Böckelsburg3.12011
    Okko Fortuna3.12011
    Bill v. Bessingslust3.12011
    Nora v. d. Bärenburg3.12011
    Britta v. Hasselbach3.12011
    Blanka v. d. Böckelsburg3.12011
    Heidi v. Lönsstein3.12011
    Britta v. Lossetal3.12011
    Cent Graf v. Amelsbüren3.12011
    Tasso v. Feuersang3.12011
    Boss Holsatia3.12011
    Astor v. d. Weide3.12011
    Eike v. Sämmenhof3.12011
    Condor v. d. Jägerhalle3.12011
    Britta v. Bärenhorst3.12011
    Janka v. Holmesborn3.12011
    Lasko v. Holmesborn3.12011
    Arco v. Reutherspfad3.12011
    Gina Dankwarder Ode3.12011
    Anka v. d. Zirkelquelle3.12011
    Ines v. d. Waterkant3.12011
    Rena v. d. Binnenelbe3.12011
    Kondor v. Odisheim3.12011
    Ino v. Kreyenhorst3.12011
    Natter v. Lönsstein3.12011
    Artus v. d. Hasewiesen3.12011
    Grandel v. d. Lindenhöhe3.12011
    Gero v. Wiken3.12011

    Last updated Wednesday 23 November 2022 20:32 CET



    I have 🍪s