Pedigree Analysis

    Generations

    Coefficients of Kinship, Relationship and Inbreeding 5 Generations - Birka v. d. Hirtenburg
    This page shows the inbreeding calculations for the dog you selected or the "Test Mating" you have entered. The calculations on this page are accurate to the point that they can only be made based upon the information in the database. For more detailed calculations please make sure that as many ancestors as possible are entered to the database.

    COI Calculation - Birka v. d. Hirtenburg
    COI 5 gen: 0.195%    too low to be reliabe    Calculate COI again

    Please do the new calculation only if you have entered new ancestors of this dog!


    COI Calculation - Sire Lukas v. Linduri and Dam Tina v. d. Bilsbek
    Sire: COI 5 gen: 0.000%    too low to be reliabe    Calculate COI again

    Dam: COI 5 gen: 3.125%    very low    Calculate COI again

    Ancestor-Loss coefficient (ALC)
    This method doesn't replace the calculation of the COI but also gives important information for the breeder. Ancestor-Loss is given when the same ancestor appears more than once in the pedigree of the dog. A 5-generations-pedigree shows 62 possible ancestors. If one of this 62 possible ancestors appears twice, the dog in question has indeed only 61 different ancestors. If 3 ancestors appear twice, this dog has indeed only 59 different ancestors. The ALC is calculated out of the nr. of the ancestors and the total nr. of possible ancestors.

    # of dogs
    Ancestors in 5 Generations (max. 62)57
    Ancestor Loss5
    Ancestor Loss in %91.94 %

    Contributing Ancestors
    AncestorBlood %# of appearances12345
    Tina v. d. Bilsbek50.00011
    Lukas v. Linduri50.00011
    Chico v. Borgkamp25.00011
    Olly v. Bärenhorst25.00011
    Asra v. Eulenhof25.00011
    Hesta v. Linduri25.00011
    Xari v. Wolfsgrund12.50011
    Anka v. Kappelbuck12.50011
    Elvi v. Lossetal12.50011
    Paris v. d. Waterkant12.50011
    Asta v. Bartelskamp12.50011
    Maestro De Wynen12.50011
    Drossel v. d. Grassel12.50011
    Etzel v. Nörderkamp12.50011
    Uhl v. Lönsstein9.370211
    Cäsar v. d. Zirkelquelle9.370211
    Ines v. d. Waterkant6.25011
    Drossel v. Hofried6.25011
    Astor v. d. Weide6.25011
    Artus v. d. Hasewiesen6.25011
    Boss Holsatia6.25011
    Falko v. d. Tränke6.25011
    Britta v. Bärenhorst6.25011
    Flocke v. d. Tränke6.25011
    Asta v. Rauhen Ebrach Tal6.25011
    Gero v. Wiken6.25011
    Sonja v. Lönsstein6.25011
    Ria v. d. Böckelsburg6.25011
    Britta v. Hasselbach6.25011
    Wido v. Schwege6.25011
    Cent Graf v. Amelsbüren6.24022
    Golo Dankwarder Ode6.24022
    Cita v. d. Tränke6.24022
    Olli v. d. Böckelsburg3.12011
    Bodo v. Weserstrand3.12011
    Cora v. Tannenkamp3.12011
    Unda v. Lönsstein3.12011
    Manto v. d. Düsterbeck3.12011
    Rasso v. Lönsstein3.12011
    Utz v. Lönsstein3.12011
    Ajax v. Klockhof3.12011
    Enno Holsatia3.12011
    Asso v. Stubben3.12011
    Mary v. Lönsstein3.12011
    Dina v. Steinroden3.12011
    Quinti v. Schwege3.12011
    Natter v. Lönsstein3.12011
    Asta v. Hofried3.12011
    Gero v. Sämmenhof3.12011
    Diwa v. Kampstüh3.12011
    Franka De Wynen3.12011
    Hella v. d. Moorbrücke3.12011
    Ingo v. Schadwalde3.12011
    Pascha v. d. Binnenelbe3.12011
    Cilly v. Waterkant3.12011
    Delta v. Langen Siek3.12011
    Afra v. Seggehorn3.12011

    Last updated Wednesday 23 November 2022 20:32 CET



    I have 🍪s