Pedigree Analysis

    Generations

    Coefficients of Kinship, Relationship and Inbreeding 5 Generations - Zeus v. d. Holzheide
    This page shows the inbreeding calculations for the dog you selected or the "Test Mating" you have entered. The calculations on this page are accurate to the point that they can only be made based upon the information in the database. For more detailed calculations please make sure that as many ancestors as possible are entered to the database.

    COI Calculation - Zeus v. d. Holzheide
    COI 5 gen: 0.781%    too low to be reliabe    Calculate COI again

    Please do the new calculation only if you have entered new ancestors of this dog!


    COI Calculation - Sire Lukas v. Linduri and Dam Perle v. d. Holzheide
    Sire: COI 5 gen: 0.000%    too low to be reliabe    Calculate COI again

    Dam: COI 5 gen: 4.688%    very low    Calculate COI again

    Ancestor-Loss coefficient (ALC)
    This method doesn't replace the calculation of the COI but also gives important information for the breeder. Ancestor-Loss is given when the same ancestor appears more than once in the pedigree of the dog. A 5-generations-pedigree shows 62 possible ancestors. If one of this 62 possible ancestors appears twice, the dog in question has indeed only 61 different ancestors. If 3 ancestors appear twice, this dog has indeed only 59 different ancestors. The ALC is calculated out of the nr. of the ancestors and the total nr. of possible ancestors.

    # of dogs
    Ancestors in 5 Generations (max. 62)58
    Ancestor Loss4
    Ancestor Loss in %93.55 %

    Contributing Ancestors
    AncestorBlood %# of appearances12345
    Perle v. d. Holzheide50.00011
    Lukas v. Linduri50.00011
    Yalk De Wynen25.00011
    Nixe v. d. Holzheide25.00011
    Olly v. Bärenhorst25.00011
    Hesta v. Linduri25.00011
    Rachel De Wynen12.50011
    Paris v. d. Waterkant12.50011
    Cindy v. Bärenhorst12.50011
    Niklas De Wynen12.50011
    Drossel v. d. Grassel12.50011
    Asta v. Bartelskamp12.50011
    Etzel v. Nörderkamp12.50011
    Hesto v. Werlacke12.50011
    Unda v. Lönsstein9.370211
    Xandra v. Lönsstein9.370211
    Asta v. Werlacke9.370211
    Groll v. Reutherspfad6.25011
    Irrwisch De Wynen6.25011
    Cai Holsatia6.25011
    Jenny De Wynen6.25011
    Astor v. d. Weide6.25011
    Boss Holsatia6.25011
    Britta v. Bärenhorst6.25011
    Gero v. Wiken6.25011
    Ria v. d. Böckelsburg6.25011
    Artus v. d. Hasewiesen6.25011
    Ines v. d. Waterkant6.25011
    Britta v. Hasselbach6.25011
    Bobby v. Leefeld6.25011
    Utz v. Lönsstein6.24022
    Ingo v. Schadwalde3.12011
    Dina v. Steinroden3.12011
    Asta v. Steinleite3.12011
    Hanko v. Sämmenhof3.12011
    Afra v. Seggehorn3.12011
    Ex v. Oberleis3.12011
    Arco v. Reutherspfad3.12011
    Delta v. Langen Siek3.12011
    Olli v. d. Böckelsburg3.12011
    Bessy v. Giessbachtal3.12011
    Dolf v. Lönsstein3.12011
    Cora v. Tannenkamp3.12011
    Enno Holsatia3.12011
    Manto v. d. Düsterbeck3.12011
    Cilly v. Waterkant3.12011
    Rasso v. Lönsstein3.12011
    Ajax v. Klockhof3.12011
    Heidi v. Lönsstein3.12011
    Jette v. d. Bilsbek3.12011
    Diwa v. Kampstüh3.12011
    Hazel De Wynen3.12011
    Boro v. Silbersee3.12011
    Golo Dankwarder Ode3.12011
    Alf v. Schinterkogel3.12011
    Pascha v. d. Binnenelbe3.12011
    Gambo v. Werlacke3.12011
    Mary v. Lönsstein3.12011

    Last updated Wednesday 23 November 2022 20:32 CET



    I have 🍪s