Pedigree Analysis

    Generations

    Coefficients of Kinship, Relationship and Inbreeding 5 Generations - Denver v. d. Schmiede
    This page shows the inbreeding calculations for the dog you selected or the "Test Mating" you have entered. The calculations on this page are accurate to the point that they can only be made based upon the information in the database. For more detailed calculations please make sure that as many ancestors as possible are entered to the database.

    COI Calculation - Denver v. d. Schmiede
    COI 5 gen: 0.586%    too low to be reliabe    Calculate COI again

    Please do the new calculation only if you have entered new ancestors of this dog!


    COI Calculation - Sire Aury v. Waidbosch and Dam Bessy v. d. Schmiede
    Sire: COI 5 gen: 0.391%    too low to be reliabe    Calculate COI again

    Dam: COI 5 gen: 0.000%    too low to be reliabe    Calculate COI again

    Ancestor-Loss coefficient (ALC)
    This method doesn't replace the calculation of the COI but also gives important information for the breeder. Ancestor-Loss is given when the same ancestor appears more than once in the pedigree of the dog. A 5-generations-pedigree shows 62 possible ancestors. If one of this 62 possible ancestors appears twice, the dog in question has indeed only 61 different ancestors. If 3 ancestors appear twice, this dog has indeed only 59 different ancestors. The ALC is calculated out of the nr. of the ancestors and the total nr. of possible ancestors.

    # of dogs
    Ancestors in 5 Generations (max. 62)59
    Ancestor Loss3
    Ancestor Loss in %95.16 %

    Contributing Ancestors
    AncestorBlood %# of appearances12345
    Aury v. Waidbosch50.00011
    Bessy v. d. Schmiede50.00011
    Emo v. Falkenhorst25.00011
    Ondra v. Lossetal25.00011
    Esko v. Mühlenberg25.00011
    Branka v. d. Bärenklause25.00011
    Cilly v. Falkenhorst12.50011
    Eike v. Lossetal12.50011
    Fanni v. Osterfeld12.50011
    Irrwisch De Wynen12.50011
    Eggi v. Bruckhof12.50011
    Hesto v. Werlacke12.50011
    Bosco v. Rotenberg12.50011
    Hasso v. d. Holzheide12.50011
    Evi v. Neuenhof6.25011
    Cindy v. Bärenhorst6.25011
    Asta v. Werlacke6.25011
    Esko v. Steinroden6.25011
    Niko v. d. Waterkant6.25011
    Asta v. Mönchsbrunnen6.25011
    Flocke v. d. Tränke6.25011
    Uhl v. Lönsstein6.25011
    Xandra v. Lönsstein6.25011
    Utz v. Lönsstein6.25011
    Timm v. d. Holzheide6.25011
    Esko Vun'N Wischhoff6.25011
    Quattra De Wynen6.25011
    Xandra v. Mühlenberg6.25011
    Sent Z Grygovskych6.25011
    Bobby v. Leefeld6.25011
    Natter v. Lönsstein6.24022
    Bodo v. Weserstrand6.24022
    Groll v. Reutherspfad6.24022
    Mary v. Lönsstein3.12011
    Alf v. Schinterkogel3.12011
    Asta v. Steinleite3.12011
    Dolf v. Lönsstein3.12011
    Astor v. Hofried3.12011
    Inka v. d. Waterkant3.12011
    Ex v. Oberleis3.12011
    Cita v. d. Tränke3.12011
    Afra v. Huttfleth3.12011
    Whisky v. Schwege3.12011
    Bessy v. Giessbachtal3.12011
    Gero v. Sämmenhof3.12011
    Immo v. d. Binnenelbe3.12011
    Dunja v. Wasserschlob3.12011
    Unda v. Lönsstein3.12011
    Puma Z Grygovskych3.12011
    Biene v. Ringofen3.12011
    Cent Graf v. Amelsbüren3.12011
    Tim v. Feuersang3.12011
    Maestro De Wynen3.12011
    Ute v. Mühlenberg3.12011
    Nero Fortuna3.12011
    Anka v. d. Zirkelquelle3.12011
    Laura De Wynen3.12011
    Gina Dankwarder Ode3.12011
    Birko v. Holsatia3.12011

    Last updated Wednesday 23 November 2022 20:32 CET



    I have 🍪s