Pedigree Analysis

    Generations

    Coefficients of Kinship, Relationship and Inbreeding 5 Generations - Gordon v. d. Hafkesdell
    This page shows the inbreeding calculations for the dog you selected or the "Test Mating" you have entered. The calculations on this page are accurate to the point that they can only be made based upon the information in the database. For more detailed calculations please make sure that as many ancestors as possible are entered to the database.

    COI Calculation - Gordon v. d. Hafkesdell
    COI 5 gen: 0.000%    too low to be reliabe    Calculate COI again

    Please do the new calculation only if you have entered new ancestors of this dog!


    COI Calculation - Sire Bobby v. d. Hasenheide and Dam Cora v. d. Hafkesdell
    Sire: COI 5 gen: 0.000%    too low to be reliabe    Calculate COI again

    Dam: COI 5 gen: 0.195%    too low to be reliabe    Calculate COI again

    Ancestor-Loss coefficient (ALC)
    This method doesn't replace the calculation of the COI but also gives important information for the breeder. Ancestor-Loss is given when the same ancestor appears more than once in the pedigree of the dog. A 5-generations-pedigree shows 62 possible ancestors. If one of this 62 possible ancestors appears twice, the dog in question has indeed only 61 different ancestors. If 3 ancestors appear twice, this dog has indeed only 59 different ancestors. The ALC is calculated out of the nr. of the ancestors and the total nr. of possible ancestors.

    # of dogs
    Ancestors in 5 Generations (max. 62)60
    Ancestor Loss2
    Ancestor Loss in %96.77 %

    Contributing Ancestors
    AncestorBlood %# of appearances12345
    Cora v. d. Hafkesdell50.00011
    Bobby v. d. Hasenheide50.00011
    Olga v. Bärenhorst25.00011
    Cliff v. Linduri25.00011
    Dina Chamavia25.00011
    Alf v. Siegbogen25.00011
    Etzel v. Nörderkamp12.50011
    Harro v. Lossetal12.50011
    Josi v. Königsfeld12.50011
    Uta Chamavia12.50011
    Asta v. Bartelskamp12.50011
    Paris v. d. Waterkant12.50011
    Erko v. Jahnplatz12.50011
    Drossel v. d. Grassel12.50011
    Wido v. Schwege9.370211
    Eiko Vun'N Wischhoff6.25011
    Ria v. d. Böckelsburg6.25011
    Ines v. d. Waterkant6.25011
    Britta v. Hasselbach6.25011
    Dunja v. d. Krausen Eiche6.25011
    Freya v. Sämmenhof6.25011
    Artus v. d. Hasewiesen6.25011
    Boss Holsatia6.25011
    Astor v. Hofried6.25011
    Britta v. Lossetal6.25011
    Lord v. Reinufer6.25011
    Astor v. d. Weide6.25011
    Gero v. Wiken6.25011
    Britta v. Bärenhorst6.25011
    Jenny v. Römersee6.25011
    Olli v. d. Böckelsburg3.12011
    Falk v. Lönsstein3.12011
    Cora v. Tannenkamp3.12011
    Uhl v. Lönsstein3.12011
    Pascha v. d. Binnenelbe3.12011
    Manto v. d. Düsterbeck3.12011
    Golo Dankwarder Ode3.12011
    Rasso v. Lönsstein3.12011
    Unda v. Lönsstein3.12011
    Ajax v. Klockhof3.12011
    Asso v. Stubben3.12011
    Blitz v. Weithof3.12011
    Thanhausen's Abke3.12011
    Utz v. Lönsstein3.12011
    Biene v. Ringofen3.12011
    Quinti v. Schwege3.12011
    Anka v. d. Vereinigung3.12011
    Gero v. Sämmenhof3.12011
    Birko v. Holsatia3.12011
    Heike v. Sämmenhof3.12011
    Asta v. Totengrund3.12011
    Ingo v. Schadwalde3.12011
    Dina v. Steinroden3.12011
    Enno Holsatia3.12011
    Morro v. Feuersang3.12011
    Delta v. Langen Siek3.12011
    Flocke v. d. Tränke3.12011
    Cilly v. Waterkant3.12011
    Afra v. Seggehorn3.12011
    Diwa v. Kampstüh3.12011

    Last updated Wednesday 23 November 2022 20:32 CET



    I have 🍪s