Pedigree Analysis

    Generations

    Coefficients of Kinship, Relationship and Inbreeding 5 Generations - Assel v. Tannengarten
    This page shows the inbreeding calculations for the dog you selected or the "Test Mating" you have entered. The calculations on this page are accurate to the point that they can only be made based upon the information in the database. For more detailed calculations please make sure that as many ancestors as possible are entered to the database.

    COI Calculation - Assel v. Tannengarten
    COI 5 gen: 0.000%    too low to be reliabe    Calculate COI again

    Please do the new calculation only if you have entered new ancestors of this dog!


    COI Calculation - Sire Orkan v. d. Königseiche and Dam Jule v. Linduri
    Sire: COI 5 gen: 0.000%    too low to be reliabe    Calculate COI again

    Dam: COI 5 gen: 3.906%    very low    Calculate COI again

    Ancestor-Loss coefficient (ALC)
    This method doesn't replace the calculation of the COI but also gives important information for the breeder. Ancestor-Loss is given when the same ancestor appears more than once in the pedigree of the dog. A 5-generations-pedigree shows 62 possible ancestors. If one of this 62 possible ancestors appears twice, the dog in question has indeed only 61 different ancestors. If 3 ancestors appear twice, this dog has indeed only 59 different ancestors. The ALC is calculated out of the nr. of the ancestors and the total nr. of possible ancestors.

    # of dogs
    Ancestors in 5 Generations (max. 62)56
    Ancestor Loss6
    Ancestor Loss in %90.32 %

    Contributing Ancestors
    AncestorBlood %# of appearances12345
    Orkan v. d. Königseiche50.00011
    Jule v. Linduri50.00011
    Alo v. Burgstall25.00011
    Groll v. Huntetal25.00011
    Hesta v. Linduri25.00011
    Inka v. d. Königseiche25.00011
    Erko v. Jahnplatz12.50011
    Fango v. Nörderkamp12.50011
    Drossel v. d. Grassel12.50011
    Bianka v. d. Königseiche12.50011
    Ria v. d. Böckelsburg12.50022
    Etzel v. Nörderkamp12.50011
    Laika v. d. Waterkant12.50011
    Benno v. d. Haalquelle12.50011
    Solojäger's Anka12.50011
    Ajax v. Klockhof9.36033
    Ines v. d. Waterkant6.25011
    Chisko Jenno Graf v. Amelsbüren6.25011
    Bob v. d. Schlei6.25011
    Cäsar v. Bruckhof6.25011
    Edda v. Jurawald6.25011
    Lord v. Lönsstein6.25011
    Cäsar v. d. Zirkelquelle6.25011
    Astor v. d. Weide6.25011
    Artus v. d. Hasewiesen6.25011
    Hilda v. d. Hasewiesen6.25011
    Enno v. Forstgarten6.25011
    Wido v. Schwege6.25011
    Freya v. Sämmenhof6.25011
    Britta v. Hasselbach6.25011
    Moritz v. Sämmenhof6.24022
    Olli v. d. Böckelsburg6.24022
    Isko v. d. Bockswiese3.12011
    Ingo v. Schadwalde3.12011
    Diwa v. Kampstüh3.12011
    Dina v. Forstgarten3.12011
    Falk v. Lönsstein3.12011
    Cita v. d. Donauauen3.12011
    Arrak v. Hagenpolder3.12011
    Asso v. Stubben3.12011
    Cora v. Tannenkamp3.12011
    Freifrau v. d. Overbecker Mühle3.12011
    Rasso v. Lönsstein3.12011
    Katja Germania3.12011
    Golo Dankwarder Ode3.12011
    Afra v. Seggehorn3.12011
    Quinti v. Schwege3.12011
    Anke v. Birkenhof3.12011
    Utz v. Lönsstein3.12011
    Grandt v. d. Uhrau3.12011
    Anja v. Taubertal3.12011
    Birko v. Holsatia3.12011
    Hella v. d. Moorbrücke3.12011
    Gero v. Sämmenhof3.12011
    Carry v. d. Hasewiesen3.12011
    Cilly v. Waterkant3.12011

    Last updated Wednesday 23 November 2022 20:32 CET



    I have 🍪s