Pedigree Analysis

    Generations

    Coefficients of Kinship, Relationship and Inbreeding 5 Generations - Eddy v. d. Pfauheck
    This page shows the inbreeding calculations for the dog you selected or the "Test Mating" you have entered. The calculations on this page are accurate to the point that they can only be made based upon the information in the database. For more detailed calculations please make sure that as many ancestors as possible are entered to the database.

    COI Calculation - Eddy v. d. Pfauheck
    COI 5 gen: 0.391%    too low to be reliabe    Calculate COI again

    Please do the new calculation only if you have entered new ancestors of this dog!


    COI Calculation - Sire Bodo v. Steyerberg and Dam Aika v. d. Pfauheck
    Sire: COI 5 gen: 1.855%    very very low    Calculate COI again

    Dam: COI 5 gen: 0.000%    too low to be reliabe    Calculate COI again

    Ancestor-Loss coefficient (ALC)
    This method doesn't replace the calculation of the COI but also gives important information for the breeder. Ancestor-Loss is given when the same ancestor appears more than once in the pedigree of the dog. A 5-generations-pedigree shows 62 possible ancestors. If one of this 62 possible ancestors appears twice, the dog in question has indeed only 61 different ancestors. If 3 ancestors appear twice, this dog has indeed only 59 different ancestors. The ALC is calculated out of the nr. of the ancestors and the total nr. of possible ancestors.

    # of dogs
    Ancestors in 5 Generations (max. 62)59
    Ancestor Loss3
    Ancestor Loss in %95.16 %

    Contributing Ancestors
    AncestorBlood %# of appearances12345
    Bodo v. Steyerberg50.00011
    Aika v. d. Pfauheck50.00011
    Ossy De Wynen25.00011
    Hecht v. d. Königseiche25.00011
    Bonny v. Jägerkreuz25.00011
    Troll v. Rheinufer25.00011
    Itta De Wynen12.50011
    Rig Chamavia12.50011
    Boss v. Silbersee12.50011
    Arko v. Abtswald12.50011
    Alf v. Geierling12.50011
    Anja v. Salinenblick12.50011
    Gilla v. Reinufer12.50011
    Gundi v. d. Königseiche12.50011
    Etzel v. Sämmenhof6.25011
    Cäsar v. d. Hohen Geest6.25011
    Uhl v. Lönsstein6.25011
    Axel v. Fichtenhain6.25011
    Bussa v. Saaletal6.25011
    Utz v. Lönsstein6.25011
    Okai v. d. Holzheide6.25011
    Milla v. Feuersang6.25011
    Anke v. d. Igelsheide6.25011
    Ino v. Kreyenhorst6.25011
    Bianka v. d. Königseiche6.25011
    Citta v. Langen Siek6.25011
    Astor v. Hofried6.25011
    Jenny v. Römersee6.25011
    Hussa v. Rheinufer6.25011
    Xandra v. Lönsstein6.25011
    Natter v. Lönsstein6.24022
    Bodo v. Weserstrand6.24022
    Axel v. Lönsstein6.24022
    Cuno v. d. Frankenburg3.12011
    Asta v. Totengrund3.12011
    Wido v. Schwege3.12011
    Illa v. Feuersang3.12011
    Alan Z Serikoveho Kraje3.12011
    Boris v. Langen Siek3.12011
    Imme v. Feuersang3.12011
    Astra v. Klosterberg3.12011
    Lord v. Lönsstein3.12011
    Arko v. d. Waterkant3.12011
    Mary v. Lönsstein3.12011
    Hesta v. Lönsstein3.12011
    Dolf v. Lönsstein3.12011
    Nadja v. d. Düsterbeck3.12011
    Arno v. Karlshof3.12011
    Anka v. Lönsstein3.12011
    Daisy v. Sämmenhof3.12011
    Heike v. Sämmenhof3.12011
    Piter v. Feuersang3.12011
    Gabi v. d. Frankenburg3.12011
    Gero v. Sämmenhof3.12011
    Alf v. d. Waterkant3.12011
    Fenna v. Kreyenhorst3.12011
    Anka v. d. Vereinigung3.12011
    Chisko Jenno Graf v. Amelsbüren3.12011
    Whisky v. Schwege3.12011

    Last updated Wednesday 23 November 2022 20:32 CET



    I have 🍪s