Pedigree Analysis

    Generations

    Coefficients of Kinship, Relationship and Inbreeding 5 Generations - Elsa v. Burghöft
    This page shows the inbreeding calculations for the dog you selected or the "Test Mating" you have entered. The calculations on this page are accurate to the point that they can only be made based upon the information in the database. For more detailed calculations please make sure that as many ancestors as possible are entered to the database.

    COI Calculation - Elsa v. Burghöft
    COI 5 gen: 0.000%    too low to be reliabe    Calculate COI again

    Please do the new calculation only if you have entered new ancestors of this dog!


    COI Calculation - Sire Nimrod's Birko and Dam Iva v. d. Drachheide
    Sire: COI 5 gen: 0.391%    too low to be reliabe    Calculate COI again

    Dam: COI 5 gen: 0.000%    too low to be reliabe    Calculate COI again

    Ancestor-Loss coefficient (ALC)
    This method doesn't replace the calculation of the COI but also gives important information for the breeder. Ancestor-Loss is given when the same ancestor appears more than once in the pedigree of the dog. A 5-generations-pedigree shows 62 possible ancestors. If one of this 62 possible ancestors appears twice, the dog in question has indeed only 61 different ancestors. If 3 ancestors appear twice, this dog has indeed only 59 different ancestors. The ALC is calculated out of the nr. of the ancestors and the total nr. of possible ancestors.

    # of dogs
    Ancestors in 5 Generations (max. 62)60
    Ancestor Loss2
    Ancestor Loss in %96.77 %

    Contributing Ancestors
    AncestorBlood %# of appearances12345
    Iva v. d. Drachheide50.00011
    Nimrod's Birko50.00011
    Lyra v. d. Königseiche25.00011
    Larry v. Ringofen25.00011
    Cliff v. Linduri25.00011
    Aspe v. Bondenholz25.00011
    Gundi v. d. Königseiche12.50011
    Etzel v. Nörderkamp12.50011
    Harro v. Lossetal12.50011
    Daisy v. Ringofen12.50011
    Quell v. d. Binnenelbe12.50011
    Arrak v. Hagenpolder12.50011
    Chica v. d. Drachheide12.50011
    Drossel v. d. Grassel12.50011
    Fango v. Waterkant9.370211
    Cäsar v. d. Hohen Geest6.25011
    Eiko Vun'N Wischhoff6.25011
    Enno v. d. Jade6.25011
    Artus v. d. Hasewiesen6.25011
    Ria v. d. Böckelsburg6.25011
    Nadja v. Lönsstein6.25011
    Bianka v. d. Königseiche6.25011
    Nina v. d. Binnenelbe6.25011
    Britta v. Hasselbach6.25011
    Cilli v. Berghof6.25011
    Bob v. Moorkamp6.25011
    Freya v. Fährhaus6.25011
    Britta v. Lossetal6.25011
    Hanko v. Sämmenhof6.25011
    Astor v. d. Weide6.25011
    Assi v. Lönsstein6.24022
    Lord v. Lönsstein3.12011
    Cora v. Tannenkamp3.12011
    Uhl v. Lönsstein3.12011
    Olli v. d. Böckelsburg3.12011
    Altje v. d. Uptloher Mark3.12011
    Birko v. Lönsstein3.12011
    Golo Dankwarder Ode3.12011
    Utz v. Lönsstein3.12011
    Ajax v. Klockhof3.12011
    Quick v. Feuersang3.12011
    Birko v. Holsatia3.12011
    Biene v. Ringofen3.12011
    Don v. Kipp3.12011
    Cilly v. Waterkant3.12011
    Flocke v. d. Tränke3.12011
    Anka v. Duewelsknapp3.12011
    Bianka v. d. Jade3.12011
    Bodo v. Weserstrand3.12011
    Diwa v. Kampstüh3.12011
    Gabi v. Odisheim3.12011
    Okko Fortuna3.12011
    Ingo v. Schadwalde3.12011
    Imme v. Feuersang3.12011
    Chisko Jenno Graf v. Amelsbüren3.12011
    Zent v. Feuersang3.12011
    Nero Z Jiv3.12011
    Eike v. Sämmenhof3.12011
    Afra v. Seggehorn3.12011
    Whisky v. Schwege3.12011

    Last updated Wednesday 23 November 2022 20:32 CET



    I have 🍪s