Pedigree Analysis

    Generations

    Coefficients of Kinship, Relationship and Inbreeding 5 Generations - Graf Nelha
    This page shows the inbreeding calculations for the dog you selected or the "Test Mating" you have entered. The calculations on this page are accurate to the point that they can only be made based upon the information in the database. For more detailed calculations please make sure that as many ancestors as possible are entered to the database.

    COI Calculation - Graf Nelha
    COI 5 gen: 0.000%    too low to be reliabe    Calculate COI again

    Please do the new calculation only if you have entered new ancestors of this dog!


    COI Calculation - Sire Etzel v. Nörderkamp and Dam Solojäger's Granne
    Sire: COI 5 gen: 0.000%    too low to be reliabe    Calculate COI again

    Dam: COI 5 gen: 0.000%    too low to be reliabe    Calculate COI again

    Ancestor-Loss coefficient (ALC)
    This method doesn't replace the calculation of the COI but also gives important information for the breeder. Ancestor-Loss is given when the same ancestor appears more than once in the pedigree of the dog. A 5-generations-pedigree shows 62 possible ancestors. If one of this 62 possible ancestors appears twice, the dog in question has indeed only 61 different ancestors. If 3 ancestors appear twice, this dog has indeed only 59 different ancestors. The ALC is calculated out of the nr. of the ancestors and the total nr. of possible ancestors.

    # of dogs
    Ancestors in 5 Generations (max. 62)61
    Ancestor Loss1
    Ancestor Loss in %98.39 %

    Contributing Ancestors
    AncestorBlood %# of appearances12345
    Etzel v. Nörderkamp50.00011
    Solojäger's Granne50.00011
    Solojäger's Distel25.00011
    Becas v. Lönsstein25.00011
    Artus v. d. Hasewiesen25.00011
    Ria v. d. Böckelsburg25.00011
    Edda v. Jurawald12.50011
    Cita v. Winterberg12.50011
    Olli v. d. Böckelsburg12.50011
    Bautz v. Mönchsbrunnen12.50011
    Ajax v. Klockhof12.50011
    Cora v. Tannenkamp12.50011
    Ingo v. Schadwalde12.50011
    Hektor v. d. Lindenhöhe12.50011
    Elko v. Turkenweg6.25011
    Eske v. Sämmenhof6.25011
    Moritz v. Sämmenhof6.25011
    Lissi v.d Böckelsburg6.25011
    Bill v. Bessingslust6.25011
    Ute v. Lönsstein6.25011
    Wido v. Schwege6.25011
    Assi v. Nörderkamp6.25011
    Lasko v. Holmesborn6.25011
    Grandel v. d. Lindenhöhe6.25011
    Basko v. Neuenhof6.25011
    Anka v. d. Zirkelquelle6.25011
    Esko Vun'N Wischhoff6.25011
    Cilla v. d. Holzheide6.25011
    Anja v. Taubertal6.25011
    Bob v. d. Falloh6.25011
    Bor Aus Pilsen3.12011
    Citta v. Arlsberg3.12011
    Kondor v. Odisheim3.12011
    Petra v. Feuersang3.12011
    Axel v. Lönsstein3.12011
    Astor v. Fichtenhain3.12011
    Buffo v. Lippetal3.12011
    Asso v. Stubben3.12011
    Alan Z Serikoveho Kraje3.12011
    Cessie v. Holundereck3.12011
    Hella v. Sämmenhof3.12011
    Birko v. Holsatia3.12011
    Drauf v. d. Lindenhöhe3.12011
    Osi v. Volkach3.12011
    Cornetta v. Turkenweg3.12011
    Hella v. d. Moorbrücke3.12011
    Basko v. Hesselborn3.12011
    Cuno v. Eickebusch3.12011
    Cilli v. Preussenwald3.12011
    Bodo v. Weserstrand3.12011
    Natter v. Lönsstein3.12011
    Biene v. Ringofen3.12011
    Edda v. Torfberg3.12011
    Quinti v. Schwege3.12011
    Immo v. d. Binnenelbe3.12011
    Afra v. Huttfleth3.12011
    Zent v. Feuersang3.12011
    Anka v. Wellenesch3.12011
    Bill v. Straufhain3.12011
    Polo v. Feuersang3.12011
    Blanka v. d. Böckelsburg3.12011

    Last updated Wednesday 23 November 2022 20:32 CET



    I have 🍪s