Pedigree Analysis

    Generations

    Coefficients of Kinship, Relationship and Inbreeding 5 Generations - Biene Zum Heidberg
    This page shows the inbreeding calculations for the dog you selected or the "Test Mating" you have entered. The calculations on this page are accurate to the point that they can only be made based upon the information in the database. For more detailed calculations please make sure that as many ancestors as possible are entered to the database.

    COI Calculation - Biene Zum Heidberg
    COI 5 gen: 0.195%    too low to be reliabe    Calculate COI again

    Please do the new calculation only if you have entered new ancestors of this dog!


    COI Calculation - Sire Paris v. Bärenhorst and Dam Bella v. Fährhaus
    Sire: COI 5 gen: 0.781%    too low to be reliabe    Calculate COI again

    Dam: COI 5 gen: 0.391%    too low to be reliabe    Calculate COI again

    Ancestor-Loss coefficient (ALC)
    This method doesn't replace the calculation of the COI but also gives important information for the breeder. Ancestor-Loss is given when the same ancestor appears more than once in the pedigree of the dog. A 5-generations-pedigree shows 62 possible ancestors. If one of this 62 possible ancestors appears twice, the dog in question has indeed only 61 different ancestors. If 3 ancestors appear twice, this dog has indeed only 59 different ancestors. The ALC is calculated out of the nr. of the ancestors and the total nr. of possible ancestors.

    # of dogs
    Ancestors in 5 Generations (max. 62)59
    Ancestor Loss3
    Ancestor Loss in %95.16 %

    Contributing Ancestors
    AncestorBlood %# of appearances12345
    Paris v. Bärenhorst50.00011
    Bella v. Fährhaus50.00011
    Asta v. Bartelskamp25.00011
    Ajax Hammonia25.00011
    Cent v. Hasselbach25.00011
    Amsel v. Störenhaus25.00011
    Britta v. Bärenhorst12.50011
    Gero v. Wiken12.50011
    King v. Fährhaus12.50011
    Diwa v. Kampstüh12.50011
    Ria v. Rheinufer12.50011
    Ass v. d. Schlei12.50011
    Olle v. Fährhaus12.50011
    Artus v. d. Hasewiesen12.50011
    Enno Holsatia6.25011
    Ajax v. Klockhof6.25011
    Astor v. Rothen Hahn6.25011
    Ingo v. Schadwalde6.25011
    Benn v. Moorkamp6.25011
    Etzel v. Sämmenhof6.25011
    Delta v. Langen Siek6.25011
    Unda v. Lönsstein6.25011
    Cora v. Tannenkamp6.25011
    Beste v. Lönsstein6.25011
    Adda v. Wetternwege6.25011
    Amsel v. d. Leda6.25011
    Pascha v. d. Binnenelbe6.25011
    Basko v. Neuenhof6.25011
    Frigga v. Rheinufer6.25011
    Anke v. Birkenhof6.25011
    Whisky v. Schwege6.24022
    Certa v. d. Frankenburg3.12011
    Anka v. Lönsstein3.12011
    Immo v. d. Binnenelbe3.12011
    Fango v. Waterkant3.12011
    Asta v. Werlacke3.12011
    Assi v. Lönsstein3.12011
    Greif v. Felsenkeller3.12011
    Afra v. Huttfleth3.12011
    Dina v. Steinroden3.12011
    Zent v. Feuersang3.12011
    Biene v. d. Nordheide3.12011
    Axel v. Lönsstein3.12011
    Eske v. Sämmenhof3.12011
    Bob v. d. Falloh3.12011
    Cilla v. d. Holzheide3.12011
    Dina v. d. Sandhöhen3.12011
    Gambo v. Werlacke3.12011
    Assi v. Grabengrund3.12011
    Longa Fortuna3.12011
    Britta v. Fährhaus3.12011
    Anka v. Duewelsknapp3.12011
    Wido v. Schwege3.12011
    Assi v. Nörderkamp3.12011
    Morro v. Feuersang3.12011
    Gaston Z Hradistanske Samoty3.12011
    Daisy v. Sämmenhof3.12011
    Elko v. Turkenweg3.12011
    Darex Z Plotmylku3.12011

    Last updated Wednesday 23 November 2022 20:32 CET



    I have 🍪s