Pedigree Analysis

    Generations

    Coefficients of Kinship, Relationship and Inbreeding 5 Generations - Samson De Wynen
    This page shows the inbreeding calculations for the dog you selected or the "Test Mating" you have entered. The calculations on this page are accurate to the point that they can only be made based upon the information in the database. For more detailed calculations please make sure that as many ancestors as possible are entered to the database.

    COI Calculation - Samson De Wynen
    COI 5 gen: 0.000%    too low to be reliabe    Calculate COI again

    Please do the new calculation only if you have entered new ancestors of this dog!


    COI Calculation - Sire Gilbert De Wynen and Dam Otty De Wynen
    Sire: COI 5 gen: 0.391%    too low to be reliabe    Calculate COI again

    Dam: COI 5 gen: 0.391%    too low to be reliabe    Calculate COI again

    Ancestor-Loss coefficient (ALC)
    This method doesn't replace the calculation of the COI but also gives important information for the breeder. Ancestor-Loss is given when the same ancestor appears more than once in the pedigree of the dog. A 5-generations-pedigree shows 62 possible ancestors. If one of this 62 possible ancestors appears twice, the dog in question has indeed only 61 different ancestors. If 3 ancestors appear twice, this dog has indeed only 59 different ancestors. The ALC is calculated out of the nr. of the ancestors and the total nr. of possible ancestors.

    # of dogs
    Ancestors in 5 Generations (max. 62)64
    Ancestor Loss-2
    Ancestor Loss in %103.23 %

    Contributing Ancestors
    AncestorBlood %# of appearances12345
    Jule v. Nörderkamp50.00011
    Hanno v. Lönsstein50.00011
    Gilbert De Wynen50.00011
    Otty De Wynen50.00011
    Rachel De Wynen31.250211
    Lukas v. Linduri25.00011
    Colt v. Loisachtal25.00011
    Jolly De Wynen25.00011
    Esko v. Bärenhorst25.00011
    Cora v. Linebrok25.00011
    Xandra v. Lönsstein18.740312
    Cai Holsatia15.620211
    Bob v. Zent-hof12.50011
    Etzel v. Nörderkamp12.50011
    Yalk De Wynen12.50011
    Quecke v. Haberland12.50011
    Bautz v. Mönchsbrunnen12.50011
    Unda v. Lönsstein12.50011
    Anja v. Handlkreutz12.50011
    Nadja De Wynen12.50011
    Asta v. Werlacke9.370211
    Betty v. Weberhof6.25011
    Dolf v. Lönsstein6.25011
    Mary v. Lönsstein6.25011
    Zerro v. Kettenluss6.25011
    Hanko v. Sämmenhof6.25011
    Mona v. Haberland6.25011
    Irrwisch De Wynen6.25011
    Lasko v. Holmesborn6.25011
    Jenny De Wynen6.25011
    Anka v. d. Zirkelquelle6.25011
    Rasso v. Lönsstein6.25011
    Orlo v. d. Overbecker Mühle6.25011
    Gambo v. Werlacke6.25011
    Jette v. d. Bilsbek6.25011
    Brinka De Soissons6.25011
    Hesto v. Werlacke6.25011
    Alf v. Schinterkogel6.24022
    Bobby v. Leefeld6.24022
    Asta v. Steinleite6.24022
    Fricka v. d. Faistenau3.12011
    Eike v. Sämmenhof3.12011
    Morro v. Feuersang3.12011
    Astor v. Fichtenhain3.12011
    Kimo v. Haberland3.12011
    Alf v. d. Strohee3.12011
    Blitz v. Buchenweg3.12011
    Certa v. d. Frankenburg3.12011
    Tanja v. Kettenluss3.12011
    Hella v. d. Moorbrücke3.12011
    Boro v. Silbersee3.12011
    Baron v. Rehsprung3.12011
    Immo v. d. Binnenelbe3.12011
    Hazel De Wynen3.12011
    Alfa v. d. Mollwiese3.12011
    Cilli v. Preussenwald3.12011
    Okko Fortuna3.12011
    Utz v. Lönsstein3.12011
    Zent v. Feuersang3.12011
    Dolli v. d. Jagdhütte3.12011
    Fina v. Kuhlenbruch3.12011
    Gabi v. Lönsstein3.12011
    Afra v. Elisenhof3.12011
    Polo v. Feuersang3.12011

    Last updated Wednesday 23 November 2022 20:32 CET



    I have 🍪s